本文選題：美國智庫　切入點(diǎn)：扶壓并舉　出處：《太平洋學(xué)報(bào)》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：自美國重返亞太以來,許多美國智庫學(xué)者對南海問題進(jìn)行了研究,并試圖通過多種方式影響美國政府的南海政策。學(xué)者們分析了中美南海博弈現(xiàn)狀及中國的南海戰(zhàn)略等問題,認(rèn)為中國采取了"拖延""定制的強(qiáng)制""剝卷心菜"等戰(zhàn)略來強(qiáng)化對南海的控制,并提出了"成本強(qiáng)加""法律戰(zhàn)""羞辱戰(zhàn)"等政策建議加以應(yīng)對。這些建議大致可分為"加大壓制""扶壓并舉"和"共同努力,緩解沖突"三種類型。奧巴馬政府大體上采納了"扶壓并舉"的政策建議,新上臺(tái)的特朗普政府將采納智庫的何種政策建議目前還不確定。中國需關(guān)注美智庫在南海問題上的研究動(dòng)態(tài)及其對美國政府的影響,謀劃南海局勢可能再度緊張的應(yīng)對之策。
[Abstract]:Since the return of the United States to the Asia-Pacific region, many American think-tank scholars have studied the South China Sea issue and tried to influence the South China Sea policy of the United States government in various ways. The scholars have analyzed the current situation of the game between China and the United States in the South China Sea and China's strategy for the South China Sea. Believing that China has adopted such strategies as "delaying", "customizing" and "stripping cabbage" to strengthen its control over the South China Sea. And put forward some policy suggestions such as "cost imposed", "legal war", "humiliation war" and so on. These suggestions can be roughly divided into "increasing suppression", "pushing together" and "working together." There are three types of conflict mitigation. The Obama administration has largely adopted the "push and push" policy recommendations. It is unclear what policy advice the new Trump administration will adopt. China needs to look at developments in the US think-tank 's research on the South China Sea and its impact on the U.S. administration and plan for a possible renewed tension in the South China Sea.
【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué);
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“我國太平洋、印度洋戰(zhàn)略研究”(14BGJ053)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：C932;D993.5
，

本文編號(hào)：1581995