本文選題：仲裁員責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：有限豁免　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：國(guó)際商事仲裁的特性是靈活性和高效性并存，這使其成為解決國(guó)際民商事糾紛的重要途徑。居于仲裁制度核心地位的仲裁員是仲裁的關(guān)鍵和靈魂，直接決定了仲裁的公正性和快捷性，也直接影響仲裁的發(fā)展，進(jìn)而對(duì)商事活動(dòng)產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)的影響。合理有效的仲裁員責(zé)任制度的建立，不僅僅能對(duì)仲裁員的行為起到約束和規(guī)范的作用，使得仲裁公平價(jià)值得以實(shí)現(xiàn)；同時(shí)，也能避免當(dāng)事人針對(duì)仲裁員的濫訴，維護(hù)仲裁的權(quán)威，保證仲裁裁決的終局效力，實(shí)現(xiàn)仲裁的效率優(yōu)勢(shì)。 目前，我國(guó)對(duì)仲裁員責(zé)任的相關(guān)規(guī)定較為模糊，無法滿足我國(guó)成為仲裁服務(wù)提供大國(guó)的需求。本文以仲裁員責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)理論作為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，分析了各國(guó)不同的立法與實(shí)踐，初步提出適合我國(guó)當(dāng)前實(shí)際情況的仲裁員責(zé)任制度體系的構(gòu)想。 第一章“仲裁員責(zé)任制度概述”。初步界定了仲裁的性質(zhì)，仲裁員的含義及資格條件，并分析了仲裁員在仲裁制度中的重要地位以及仲裁員責(zé)任的含義和內(nèi)容，作為仲裁員責(zé)任制度研究的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。 第二章“仲裁員責(zé)任制度的理論分析和立法研究”。首先分析了各國(guó)仲裁員刑事責(zé)任的相關(guān)立法，第二節(jié)分析了仲裁員民事責(zé)任傳統(tǒng)理論的三種觀點(diǎn)，即仲裁員責(zé)任論、仲裁員責(zé)任豁免論及仲裁員責(zé)任有限豁免論，，并對(duì)這三種觀點(diǎn)作出評(píng)述。 第三章“仲裁員責(zé)任的具體制度設(shè)計(jì)”。從仲裁員責(zé)任有限豁免的理論出發(fā)，對(duì)仲裁員責(zé)任制度進(jìn)行具體設(shè)計(jì)。首先分析了仲裁員的義務(wù)來源和類型，其次對(duì)仲裁員責(zé)任的范圍和內(nèi)容作出具體界定。 第四章“我國(guó)仲裁員責(zé)任制度立法現(xiàn)狀及完善”。立足于我國(guó)仲裁員責(zé)任制度的立法現(xiàn)狀，對(duì)我國(guó)的仲裁員責(zé)任立法作出評(píng)論，并提出一些建議。第三節(jié)就完善我國(guó)仲裁員民事責(zé)任體系的配套措施，提出建立仲裁員責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度并健全仲裁員培訓(xùn)制度的建議。
[Abstract]:The characteristics of international commercial arbitration is flexible and efficient coexist, which makes it become an important way to solve the international civil and commercial disputes. The core of the arbitration system of arbitrators is key and the soul of the arbitration, directly determines the fairness of arbitration and fast, also have a direct impact on the development of arbitration, and then produce a far-reaching impact on commercial activities. Establish a rational and effective system of arbitrator liability, not only to restrict and regulate the role of the arbitrator's behavior, making the arbitration fair value can be realized; at the same time, can also avoid the parties according to the arbitrator v.overcharging, maintain the authority, guarantee the arbitration final effect, realize the efficiency advantages of arbitration.
At present, the relevant provisions on the liability of arbitrators in China are fuzzy, become unable to meet the arbitration service demand in China to provide power. In this paper, on the basis of the basic theory of arbitrator responsibility as the starting point, analyzes the legislation and practice of different ideas, arbitrator responsibility system is put forward for our current actual situation..
The first chapter is "overview of the liability of arbitrators". It initially defines the nature of arbitration, the meaning and qualification of arbitrators, and analyzes the important position of arbitrators in the arbitration system, as well as the meaning and content of arbitrator's responsibilities, which is the starting point for the study of arbitrator's responsibility system.
The second chapter "the arbitrator responsibility system of the theoretical analysis and legislative research. First analyzes the relevant national legislation of criminal responsibility of the arbitrator, the second section analyzes the three viewpoints of traditional theory of civil liability of the arbitrators, arbitrators responsibility, arbitrator responsibility exemption and arbitrator responsibility limited exemption theory, and make comments on these three kinds of views.
The third chapter "design" the arbitrator responsibility of the specific system. Starting from the arbitrators limited immunity theory, the specific design of the arbitrator responsibility system. Firstly, analyzes the sources and types of compulsory arbitration, the scope of the liability of arbitrators and content to define.
The fourth chapter is "the legislation of arbitrator liability system of our country and the perfection of legislation". Based on the status of arbitrator liability system of our country, to comment on China's arbitration legislation, and puts forward some suggestions. The third section is the measures to perfect the arbitrator civil liability system of our country, proposed the establishment of arbitrator liability insurance the training system and improve the arbitrator system.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 鄧瑞平,易艷;商事仲裁責(zé)任制度簡(jiǎn)論[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 蔡鴻達(dá);英國(guó)仲裁法述評(píng)[J];法學(xué)雜志;1997年03期

3 郭玉軍;國(guó)際商事仲裁中的懲罰性賠償裁決[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年01期

4 徐前權(quán);;枉法仲裁罪之批判[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

5 陳興良;刑法謙抑的價(jià)值蘊(yùn)含[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1996年03期

6 肖永平,胡永慶;加入WTO與我國(guó)仲裁法律制度改革[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 包文捷;仲裁員責(zé)任制度探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1562798