發(fā)布時間：2018-03-01 04:01

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 鹿特丹規(guī)則 履約方 海運履約方 實際承運人　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：聯(lián)合國貿(mào)易法委員會制定的《全程或部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》即《鹿特丹規(guī)則》是21世紀(jì)國際海上貨物運輸法發(fā)展與統(tǒng)一的一個偉大成果。海運履約方制度作為公約的重要組成部分,有助于解決各國對海運履約方調(diào)整的不均衡以及不統(tǒng)一狀態(tài),是最全面、最徹底的一次制度創(chuàng)新。民法履約輔助人制度是海運履約方制度的法理基礎(chǔ),為了適應(yīng)海運實踐的需要,海上貨物運輸中的履約輔助人制度經(jīng)歷了幾種模式,包括“喜馬拉雅條款”判例法及法律規(guī)定,實際承運人制度,美國1999年《海上貨物運輸法草案》中的履約承運人制度,最后建立起了《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中的海運履約方制度。本文在對《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中海運履約方制度進行詳細分析后,提出構(gòu)建我國海運履約方制度的策略。但我國港口經(jīng)營人的責(zé)任限制問題是無法在短時間內(nèi)解決的,本文旨在對我國港口經(jīng)營人作為承運人的履約輔助人的責(zé)任限制問題提出建議和意見。 本文共分為五個部分。 第一部分,從歷史上縱向考察了海運履約方制度的沿革,概括介紹了民法履約輔助人制度,海上貨物運輸中的履約輔助人制度,進而引出海運履約方制度的建立。第二部分,解讀公約中海運履約方的概念,并將其與其他相關(guān)概念進行比較分析,得出海運履約方的特征和類型,以便將海運履約方從履約方中識別出來。第三部分,詳細論述公約下海運履約方的權(quán)利、義務(wù)和責(zé)任。第四部分,評價海運履約方制度。第五部分,在以上分析的基礎(chǔ)上,分析公約對我國海運服務(wù)業(yè)的影響,指出我國相關(guān)制度與海運履約方制度的差別及構(gòu)建我國海運履約方制度的障礙,進而提出構(gòu)建我國海運履約方制度的策略。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Commission on Trade Law Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, the Rotterdam rules, was a great achievement in the development and unification of the law of the international carriage of goods by sea in 21th century. Maritime performing parties. As an important part of the Convention, It is the most comprehensive and thorough institutional innovation that helps to solve the imbalance and disunity of the adjustment of maritime performing parties in various countries. The civil law system of performance auxiliaries is the legal basis of maritime performing party system. In order to meet the needs of maritime transport practice, the system of performance auxiliaries in the carriage of goods by sea has undergone several models, including the case law of the Himalayan Clause and the legal provisions of the actual carrier system, The system of performing carrier in the draft of the draft Law on the Carriage of goods by Sea in the United States of America in 1999, and finally the system of maritime performing party in the Rotterdam rules has been established. After a detailed analysis of the system of maritime performing parties in the Rotterdam rules, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the system of maritime performing parties in the Rotterdam rules. This paper puts forward the strategy of constructing the system of maritime performing party in our country. However, the limitation of the liability of the port operator in our country cannot be solved in a short time. The purpose of this paper is to put forward suggestions and suggestions on the limitation of the liability of the port operator as the carrier's helper of performance. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part, from the history of longitudinal investigation of the maritime performing party system evolution, a general introduction of the civil law performance assistive system, the maritime cargo transport system, and then lead to the establishment of maritime performing party system. The interpretation of the concept of maritime performing party in the Convention and its comparative analysis with other relevant concepts in order to obtain the characteristics and types of maritime performing party in order to identify the maritime performing party from the performing party... part III, The rights, obligations and responsibilities of maritime performing parties under the Convention are discussed in detail. Part 4th, the evaluation of maritime performing party system. 5th, on the basis of the above analysis, the impact of the Convention on China's maritime transport service industry is analyzed. This paper points out the differences between the relevant systems of our country and the maritime performing party system and the obstacles to the construction of the maritime performing party system of our country, and then puts forward the strategy of constructing the maritime performing party system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 徐少林;韓冰;;論港口經(jīng)營人憑提貨單放貨的義務(wù) 兼及不真正連帶責(zé)任制度的司法運用[J];法律適用;2006年07期

2 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運輸法(草案)難點問題研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

3 劉昕;海運貨物控制權(quán)問題研究——兼評UNCITRAL運輸法草案第11章的規(guī)定[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2004年02期

4 黃建設(shè);新《合同法》對港口經(jīng)營人歸責(zé)原則的影響[J];世界海運;2000年05期

5 韓立新;國際海上貨物運輸中實際承運人及其責(zé)任的認(rèn)定[J];中國海商法年刊;1997年00期

6 鄔先江,陳海波;論CMI運輸法草案有關(guān)控制權(quán)的規(guī)定[J];中國海商法年刊;2001年00期

7 朱作賢;王曉凌;李東;;對提單“提貨憑證”功能重大變革反思——評《UNCITRAL運輸法草案》的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];中國海商法年刊;2005年00期

8 余妙宏;海上貨物運輸港口經(jīng)營人責(zé)任探析[J];浙江萬里學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期

，

本文編號：1550278