本文關(guān)鍵詞：多層次糾紛解決條款的性質(zhì)和執(zhí)行力問(wèn)題研究　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 多層次糾紛解決條款 仲裁前置條款 執(zhí)行力 仲裁庭管轄權(quán)

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的日益加深，，國(guó)際商事交往活動(dòng)也變得更加頻繁。在復(fù)雜的國(guó)際商事活動(dòng)中，雙方當(dāng)事人不可避免地會(huì)產(chǎn)生價(jià)值或利益的沖突,因此在合同中事先規(guī)定適合的糾紛解決條款來(lái)解決未來(lái)合同履行中可能產(chǎn)生的糾紛是十分必要的。 多層次糾紛解決條款是一種特殊的糾紛解決條款，該條款通過(guò)遞進(jìn)的不同的糾紛解決方式來(lái)解決糾紛:調(diào)解、和解等爭(zhēng)議解決方式通常作為前置程序，而仲裁則作為最終的爭(zhēng)議解決方式。該條款在替代性糾紛解決機(jī)制的基礎(chǔ)上發(fā)展起來(lái)，并在國(guó)際商事仲裁中受到越來(lái)越廣泛的關(guān)注和適用。 本文旨在對(duì)多層次糾紛解決條款在實(shí)踐中所涉及的主要法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析和闡述，并對(duì)當(dāng)今中國(guó)多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的實(shí)踐進(jìn)行分析并提出建議。這些主要法律問(wèn)題包括：多層次糾紛解決條款的性質(zhì)、仲裁前置條款與仲裁條款的關(guān)系、是否履行仲裁前置義務(wù)的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和主體、違反仲裁前置仲裁條款對(duì)仲裁庭管轄權(quán)的影響以及多層次糾紛解決條款的執(zhí)行力等問(wèn)題。 由于各國(guó)對(duì)于多層次糾紛解決條款的相關(guān)問(wèn)題都沒(méi)有明確法律規(guī)定，筆者在本文中通過(guò)對(duì)各國(guó)實(shí)踐和典型案例的分析，梳理出各國(guó)在對(duì)待以上法律問(wèn)題時(shí)的態(tài)度和例行做法,并進(jìn)行了深入地分析和闡述:即在義務(wù)性條款的前提下，仲裁前置條款是啟動(dòng)仲裁的程序性要件，只有在雙方完成履行了前置義務(wù)時(shí)，仲裁程序才可以啟動(dòng)。但雙方達(dá)成一致同意越過(guò)前置程序直接將爭(zhēng)議交由仲裁或雙方在仲裁程序中未提出相關(guān)抗辯時(shí)，仲裁庭仍然享有管轄權(quán)；關(guān)于仲裁前置條款的執(zhí)行力和判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題，各國(guó)均未有明文的法律規(guī)定，但隨著替代性糾紛解決機(jī)制的蓬勃發(fā)展，各國(guó)在實(shí)踐中都傾向于承認(rèn)其執(zhí)行力，但前提是該仲裁前置條款的規(guī)定足夠明確以保證在執(zhí)行中不產(chǎn)生歧義。 除此之外，筆者結(jié)合對(duì)中國(guó)案例和多元化糾紛解決實(shí)踐的闡述和分析，對(duì)多層次糾紛解決條款在中國(guó)的適用給出若干建議。即雙方當(dāng)事人在訂立多層次糾紛解決條款時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)盡量明確雙方當(dāng)事人的義務(wù)、各個(gè)程序的起始時(shí)間點(diǎn)、各個(gè)階段所適用的程序性規(guī)則等，以保證其在執(zhí)行過(guò)程中足夠明確且不產(chǎn)生歧義。同時(shí)，我國(guó)法院在對(duì)多層次糾紛解決條款等替代性糾紛解決機(jī)制的問(wèn)題應(yīng)當(dāng)秉持更為開(kāi)放的態(tài)度，鼓勵(lì)其作為訴訟程序的有力補(bǔ)充，以通過(guò)最適合的方式幫助當(dāng)時(shí)人解決糾紛，進(jìn)而不斷完善我國(guó)多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的建設(shè)和發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of economic globalization, international commercial exchanges have become more frequent. In the complex international commercial activities, the conflict parties will inevitably produce value or interest, so in the contract provisions to settle disputes in advance is necessary to solve the possible future contract disputes.
The multi-level dispute resolution clause is a clause to solve a special dispute, the provisions to resolve the dispute through progressive different ways of solving disputes, mediation, reconciliation and other dispute solution is usually used as pre procedure, and arbitration as the ultimate way to resolve the dispute. The terms of development mechanism on the basis of the dispute. And more and more widely used in international commercial arbitration.
This paper aims at the main legal problems of the terms involved in practice to solve the multi-level dispute analysis and elaboration, and today's Chinese diversified dispute settlement mechanism in practice are analyzed and suggestions are put forward. These include the main legal problems: in terms of nature to solve the multi-level relationship disputes, arbitration clause and arbitration clause, whether to perform judgment the standard arbitration obligations and the main problems in terms of execution to solve the violation of pre arbitration arbitration clause to the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal and multi-level dispute.
Because of issues related to countries for multi-level dispute resolution provisions are not clear legal provisions, analysis of the practice and typical cases by the author in this paper, sort out the attitudes of the countries in dealing with the above legal issues and routine practice, and in-depth analysis and elaboration: in the premise of obligations under the terms of the. Arbitration clause is to start the arbitration procedural requirements, only in both pre fulfilled the obligations, the arbitration procedure can be started. But the two sides agreed over the preceding procedure directly to the dispute by arbitration in the arbitration proceedings or both parties did not put forward relevant defense, the arbitration tribunal still has jurisdiction; standard execution problems and judgment about the arbitration clause, legal provisions are not clear, but with the rapid development of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, all countries incline in practice To acknowledge its execution, but the premise is that the provisions of the pre arbitration clause are sufficiently clear to ensure that there is no ambiguity in the execution.
In addition, the author describes and analyses the practice of solving Chinese case and diversified disputes, some suggestions are given to solve the applicable clause in the China of multi-level dispute. Both parties in a multi-level dispute resolution clause should try to clear the duties of both parties, starting time of each program, apply to all stages of the procedural rules, to ensure that in the process of implementation is not clear enough and ambiguity. At the same time, the Chinese court should uphold the more open attitude in the multi-level dispute resolution clause of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, encourage it as a powerful supplement to the proceedings, to the most appropriate way to help at the time people solve disputes, and constantly improve the diversification of China's dispute settlement mechanism construction and development.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 袁泉,郭玉軍;ADR——西方盛行的解決民商事?tīng)?zhēng)議的熱門制度[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年01期

本文編號(hào)：1410338