本文關(guān)鍵詞：國(guó)際商事仲裁程序中“異議權(quán)放棄條款”的適用研究　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 國(guó)際商事仲裁 異議權(quán)放棄條款 仲裁法

【摘要】：國(guó)際商事仲裁作為一種平等主體間解決爭(zhēng)端的方式之一，起源于商事交易活動(dòng)的發(fā)展需要，由于其具有天然的高效性和便捷性，在實(shí)踐中被廣泛采用并發(fā)揮越來越重要的作用。世界絕大部分國(guó)家和各大國(guó)際商事仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)為了適用國(guó)際商事貿(mào)易仲裁的發(fā)展需要，都不斷地在更新和完善各自的仲裁規(guī)制和仲裁法律制度。其中，“異議權(quán)放棄條款”被納入到了仲裁規(guī)則和仲裁法的具體條文和制度中。比較有代表性的就是《聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)仲裁規(guī)制》，該規(guī)則第30條規(guī)定：當(dāng)事人一方知道有不遵照本規(guī)則的任何規(guī)定或要求行事的情況，仍進(jìn)行仲裁程序而不迅速聲明它對(duì)此中不遵照規(guī)定或者要求行事的情況表示反對(duì)，則應(yīng)視為他已經(jīng)放棄提出反對(duì)的權(quán)利，這一條款被學(xué)界稱之為“異議權(quán)放棄條款”。后來，隨著國(guó)際商事仲裁的發(fā)展，這一條款被很多國(guó)家仲裁法和仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的仲裁規(guī)則所吸收并加以完善。但是，我國(guó)《仲裁法》對(duì)此卻沒有明確規(guī)定，這無疑是一大缺憾�！爱愖h權(quán)放棄條款”旨在督促當(dāng)時(shí)人在沖裁程序中及時(shí)行使仲裁權(quán)利，避免造成仲裁資源浪費(fèi)，對(duì)于維護(hù)仲裁雙方當(dāng)事人權(quán)利都具有積極作用，，其在國(guó)際商事仲裁中顯得愈發(fā)重要。因此，加強(qiáng)對(duì)“異議權(quán)放棄條款”的研究，不僅有利于豐富我國(guó)仲裁理論和實(shí)踐，發(fā)展和完善我國(guó)仲裁法律制度，更重要的是促進(jìn)我國(guó)商事仲裁與國(guó)際接軌，增強(qiáng)我國(guó)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的國(guó)際話語權(quán)，促進(jìn)我國(guó)仲裁事業(yè)的國(guó)際化發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As a way of settling disputes between equal subjects, international commercial arbitration originates from the development needs of business transaction activities. Because of its natural efficiency and convenience, international commercial arbitration is widely adopted and playing a more and more important role in practice. Most of the world's major international commercial arbitration institutions, in order to meet the development needs of international commercial and Trade Arbitration, are constantly upgrading and perfecting their respective arbitration regulations and arbitration legal systems. Among them, the "waiver of the right of dissenting" is incorporated into the specific provisions and systems of the arbitration rules and the arbitration law. Is more representative of the "United Nations Commission on international trade law arbitration rules" regulation, the provisions of article thirtieth: if a party fails to comply with any provisions of that act or the rules of the arbitration proceedings, still not in this statement it quickly do not comply with regulations or request the opposition, he is deemed to have abandoned the right of objection, this clause has been called the "waiver of right to object". Later, with the development of international commercial arbitration, this clause was absorbed and perfected by the arbitration rules of many state arbitration laws and arbitral institutions. However, there is no definite provision in the Arbitration Law of China, which is undoubtedly a great regret. The "waiver of objection clause" aims to urge people to exercise arbitration rights in time in the process of punching, avoid wasting the resources of arbitration, and play a positive role in safeguarding the rights of both parties, which is more and more important in international commercial arbitration. Therefore, strengthening the research of "waiver of right to object", not only enrich the theory and practice of arbitration in our country, the development and perfection of our legal system of arbitration, more important is to promote China's commercial arbitration and international standards, to enhance the international discourse of China's arbitration institutions, promoting the internationalization of arbitration in China the development of.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 朱偉東;;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行中的公共政策問題[J];河北法學(xué);2007年05期

2 鐘澄;;論國(guó)際商事仲裁中“異議權(quán)放棄條款”的適用[J];河北法學(xué);2009年07期

3 徐國(guó)棟;誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則二題[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年04期

4 王晶;王瀚;;中國(guó)國(guó)際商事仲裁制度研究[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

本文編號(hào)：1346008