【摘要】：關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)是在激烈的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭應(yīng)運(yùn)而生的,其獨(dú)特的組織結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)提高經(jīng)營效率、減少經(jīng)營成本、實(shí)現(xiàn)規(guī)模效益等方面有積極的作用,但正是其組織結(jié)構(gòu)容易導(dǎo)致控制企業(yè)、實(shí)際控制人對(duì)從屬企業(yè)過度操控,誘發(fā)不正當(dāng)?shù)年P(guān)聯(lián)交易,為關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)間不當(dāng)?shù)呢?cái)產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移、資金輸送、資產(chǎn)或帳戶混同等提供了天然的屏障,不易被外部債權(quán)人發(fā)現(xiàn)。一旦關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)一個(gè)或若干個(gè)成員企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時(shí),破產(chǎn)債務(wù)人可能無財(cái)產(chǎn)供債權(quán)人分配,或者各破產(chǎn)企業(yè)之債權(quán)人所得清償明顯不公。由于我國公司法、破產(chǎn)法、一般民事法律以及刑法對(duì)破產(chǎn)制度的有關(guān)規(guī)定主要適用于單一企業(yè)破產(chǎn),對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的情形難以適用,因此有必要在借鑒其他法域有關(guān)規(guī)制關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的先進(jìn)制度的基礎(chǔ)上,如衡平居次原則、實(shí)質(zhì)合并原則、控制企業(yè)的補(bǔ)償、賠償責(zé)任、受益從屬企業(yè)的連帶賠償責(zé)任等,構(gòu)建我國關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的完整體系。本文除前沿和結(jié)語外,主要分三部分進(jìn)行論述： 第一部分,關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)形態(tài)分析,此部分主要對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)的涵義進(jìn)行界定,探討關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)的內(nèi)部關(guān)系與外部特征,并以案例的形式介紹關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的宏觀表現(xiàn)形式,歸納關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的微觀運(yùn)作,上述分析使我們認(rèn)識(shí)到關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)明顯有別于一般企業(yè)破產(chǎn),其獨(dú)特、緊密的組織結(jié)構(gòu)為關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)“創(chuàng)造”了條件。 第二部分,我國關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)的立法現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)析,這部分著重介紹了我國公司法、破產(chǎn)法、一般民事法律以及刑法對(duì)破產(chǎn)問題的有關(guān)規(guī)制,并指出上述法律制度在解決關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)問題上存在的缺陷。 第三部分,完善我國關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)規(guī)制的立法建議,該部分通過比較分析其他法域有關(guān)關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)違法破產(chǎn)制度,結(jié)合我國具體經(jīng)濟(jì)情況,提出立法建議,主要包括引進(jìn)衡平居次原則、實(shí)質(zhì)合并原則,對(duì)我國已有的法人人格否認(rèn)制度進(jìn)行改造,確立控制企業(yè)的補(bǔ)償、賠償責(zé)任以及受益從屬企業(yè)的連帶賠償責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The related enterprise is in the fierce market competition, and its unique organization structure has an active role in improving the operation efficiency, reducing the operating cost and realizing the scale benefit, but it is the organization structure which is easy to control the enterprise, The actual controller overruns the subordinate enterprises, induces an improper related transaction, provides a natural barrier for the improper transfer of property between the affiliated enterprises, the transfer of funds, the mixing of assets or accounts, and the like, and is not easy to be found by the external creditors. In that event that one or several member of the associate enterprise are in bankruptcy, the bankrupt debtor may have no property for the distribution of the creditor, or the liquidation of the creditors of the bankrupt enterprise is manifestly unfair. Because of the company law, the bankruptcy law, the general civil law and the criminal law, the relevant provisions of the bankruptcy system are mainly applied to the bankruptcy of a single enterprise, and it is difficult to apply to the case of the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises. Therefore, it is necessary to draw lessons from other jurisdictions, such as the principle of equity, the principle of substantial merger, the compensation of the control enterprise, the liability of compensation, the joint liability for the benefit of the subordinate enterprises, etc., To construct a complete system of the illegal bankruptcy of the associated enterprises in our country. In this paper, in addition to the leading edge and the epilogue, the main part of this paper is to discuss: The first part, the analysis of the law-breaking form of the affiliated enterprise, this part mainly defines the meaning of the affiliated enterprise, and discusses the internal relation and the exterior of the related enterprise. In the form of case, the paper introduces the macro-forms of the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises, and sums up the micro-operation of the enterprise's illegal bankruptcy. The above-mentioned analysis makes us realize that the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises is distinct from the bankruptcy of the general enterprise, and the only one The close organization structure is an illegal "create" of the related enterprises. The second part, the present situation and the analysis of the law of the law, the bankruptcy law, the general civil law and the criminal law to the bankruptcy of our country. It also points out that the above-mentioned legal system exists in solving the problem of the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises The third part is to perfect the legislative proposal of the law of the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises in our country. The part of this part is to put forward the legislative suggestions by comparing and analyzing the system of the illegal bankruptcy of the related enterprises in other jurisdictions, mainly including the introduction of the principle of equity and the real estate. On the basis of the principle of quality and quality, the existing legal personality denial system in China is reformed, the compensation of the control enterprise, the liability of the compensation, and the company's connection with the subordinate enterprises are established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291;D924;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 丁文聯(lián);論企業(yè)破產(chǎn)程序中的利益平衡[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

2 金劍鋒;關(guān)聯(lián)公司法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

3 孫向齊;關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法律問題研究[D];中國人民大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 葉敏;“深石原則”相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

2 江朵;關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時(shí)的實(shí)質(zhì)合并原則研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2506697