【摘要】：《公司法》第20條第2款首次對(duì)股東權(quán)濫用之內(nèi)部賠償救濟(jì)作了較為原則性的規(guī)定,由此也引發(fā)了較多的困惑和爭(zhēng)論。本文從一起較為典型的案例入手,針對(duì)當(dāng)前司法實(shí)務(wù)界關(guān)于股東權(quán)濫用之內(nèi)部賠償救濟(jì)的保守態(tài)度,論證了這一救濟(jì)方式在規(guī)范公司運(yùn)作中的價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。關(guān)于這一救濟(jì)方式的具體適用,本文認(rèn)為,應(yīng)從濫用股東權(quán)的內(nèi)涵、濫用股東權(quán)的認(rèn)定與公司自治之平衡、濫用股東權(quán)賠償救濟(jì)與其他救濟(jì)途徑的關(guān)系等方面,作出綜合的判斷衡量。
[Abstract]:Article 20, paragraph 2, of the Company Law provides for the first time that the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' rights is more in principle, which also leads to more confusion and debate. Starting with a typical case, this paper demonstrates the value and practical significance of this relief method in standardizing the operation of the company in view of the conservative attitude of the judicial practice on the internal compensation relief for the abuse of shareholders' right. With regard to the specific application of this relief method, this paper holds that we should make a comprehensive judgment and measurement from the aspects of the connotation of abuse of shareholders' rights, the balance between the identification of abuse of shareholders' rights and corporate autonomy, and the relationship between compensation relief for abuse of shareholders' rights and other remedies.
【作者單位】： 上海市靜安區(qū)人民法院;復(fù)旦大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 朱慈蘊(yùn);資本多數(shù)決原則與控制股東的誠(chéng)信義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱黎霞;;試論違反出資義務(wù)民事責(zé)任之承擔(dān)——兼評(píng)最高院《關(guān)于適用〈公司法〉若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定(三)》(征求意見(jiàn)稿)之第三部分[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

2 馮永強(qiáng);;公司性質(zhì)的爭(zhēng)議:從視角組合的角度分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

3 鄭承志;以現(xiàn)代產(chǎn)權(quán)制度支撐有效的公司治理[J];安徽商貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

4 y嚭烀，

本文編號(hào)：2506602