【摘要】：盈余分配是股東投資公司的目的之一。尤其對(duì)于不掌握公司實(shí)權(quán)的小股東而言,盈余分配幾乎是他們獲得投資回報(bào)的唯一途徑。根據(jù)《公司法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定,公司分配盈余除了需具備盈余分配的條件外,還必須經(jīng)股東會(huì)決議。換言之,股東會(huì)不作出盈余分配決議,股東的盈余分配權(quán)僅為一種期待權(quán),無(wú)法落實(shí)。實(shí)踐中,公司的大股東控制股東會(huì),在公司具備盈余分配的條件時(shí),過(guò)分提取任意公積金,或擔(dān)任公司高管,通過(guò)股東會(huì)決議向公司高管發(fā)放高額獎(jiǎng)金的形式中飽私囊,致小股東利益受損。同時(shí),盈余分配作為公司的日常決策,法院通常采取不干涉的態(tài)度,這也導(dǎo)致小股東求訴無(wú)門(mén)。筆者認(rèn)為,為了保護(hù)小股東的盈余分配權(quán),公權(quán)力應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)公司是否分配盈余給予適當(dāng)?shù)母深A(yù)。賦予小股東強(qiáng)制盈余分配訴權(quán),是最有效的方式。本文將從強(qiáng)制盈余分配之訴產(chǎn)生的原因、存在的價(jià)值、訴訟性質(zhì)、目前的司法實(shí)踐、引入強(qiáng)制盈余分配之訴的現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性、具體運(yùn)用中的程序問(wèn)題及法院處理方式入手,探索切實(shí)有效的保護(hù)小股東盈余分配權(quán)的方法。
[Abstract]:Earnings allocation is one of the objectives of shareholder investment companies. Especially for minority shareholders who don't have real power, earnings allocation is almost the only way to get a return on investment. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, the company must not only have the necessary conditions for the allocation of earnings, but also must be decided by the shareholders' meeting. In other words, shareholders will not make a resolution on the allocation of earnings, shareholders' right to allocate earnings is only a right of expectation, and cannot be implemented. In practice, the company's major shareholders control shareholders' meeting, when the company has the conditions to allocate earnings, excessive withdrawal of arbitrary provident funds, or acting as executives of the company, through the shareholders' meeting resolution to pay high bonuses to the company executives in the form of rich private pockets. Damage to the interests of minority shareholders. At the same time, as a daily decision-making of a company, the court usually takes a non-interference attitude, which also leads to a lack of access to appeal to minority shareholders. The author believes that in order to protect the minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings, the public power should intervene properly whether the company distributes the earnings or not. It is the most effective way to entrust the minority shareholders with the right of compulsory surplus distribution. This article will start with the causes, the value, the nature of litigation, the current judicial practice, the practical feasibility of introducing the litigation of compulsory surplus distribution, the procedural problems in the concrete application and the way of court handling. Explore effective ways to protect minority shareholders' right to allocate earnings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甘培忠;有限責(zé)任公司小股東利益保護(hù)的法學(xué)思考——從訴訟視角考察[J];法商研究;2002年06期

2 賈林青;;論法國(guó)公司法關(guān)于防止股東濫用權(quán)利制度的借鑒價(jià)值[J];法學(xué)家;2007年02期

3 鄧一;;論股利分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)及其司法救濟(jì)[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2010年02期

4 李凡;;試論股利分配請(qǐng)求須以股東大會(huì)決議為前提——兼談中小股東利益保護(hù)不能侵犯公司自治權(quán)[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年S1期

5 華小鵬;;論股利分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)之訴[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

6 郭婭麗;;完善股利分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)的思路[J];理論探索;2008年06期

7 陳穎;;股東利潤(rùn)分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)糾紛之司法裁判困境與出路[J];人民司法;2009年01期

8 國(guó)鵬;;談?dòng)邢薰竟蓶|的利潤(rùn)分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)——從一起案件談起[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年33期

9 張輝;;公司股東股利分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)的思考[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2007年05期

10 惠彬蔚;;論有限責(zé)任公司中小股東股利分配請(qǐng)求權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)(現(xiàn)代物業(yè)下半月刊);2009年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 包如源;股東盈余分配權(quán)的司法救濟(jì)與立法完善[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

2 云闖;有限責(zé)任公司股東盈余分配權(quán)利的法律保障與救濟(jì)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2441423