【摘要】：公司法人格否認(rèn)制度中股東責(zé)任性質(zhì)本是一個(gè)很有爭(zhēng)議的問題,2005年被《公司法》的原則規(guī)定使得該問題變得更加撲朔迷離,目前,雖然學(xué)者對(duì)此研究已形成洋洋宏論,但因角度不同,結(jié)論難以統(tǒng)一�？紤]到該問題具有很深的理論價(jià)值和很廣的應(yīng)用范疇,筆者主張應(yīng)立足我國(guó)的公司實(shí)踐,對(duì)此具體問題具體分析。 公司法人格否認(rèn)制度的創(chuàng)立目的是防止公司法人人格的濫用,以保護(hù)公司債權(quán)人及社會(huì)公眾利益免受不法侵害,我國(guó)《公司法》第20條規(guī)定由股東承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任,然而連帶責(zé)任它可以是共同連帶責(zé)任又可以是補(bǔ)充連帶責(zé)任,法律僅僅泛泛規(guī)定了連帶責(zé)任,這讓實(shí)際處理問題時(shí)遇到很多問題,司法實(shí)踐中法官對(duì)此難以界定,因此只會(huì)做出股東承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任的判決,對(duì)于判決的性質(zhì)以及其他問題就留給了執(zhí)行階段,將問題更加復(fù)雜化。 按照學(xué)者的研究,公司法人格濫用大致分為資本顯著不足、人格混同、股東的過度控制、公司形骸化這幾種常見情形。 論文從探求公司法人格否認(rèn)制度的價(jià)值追求入手,依照公平與正義的理念,在國(guó)內(nèi)外理論以及實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上通過典型的案例對(duì)這幾種常見情形下股東的責(zé)任進(jìn)行分析研究,試圖通過具體問題具體分析的辦法探討股東連帶責(zé)任的性質(zhì)及其承擔(dān)方式。
[Abstract]:The nature of shareholder liability in the system of denying corporate personality is a controversial issue, which was made more complicated by the principles of Company Law in 2005. But because of the different angle, the conclusion is difficult to unify. In view of the deep theoretical value and wide range of application of this problem, the author proposes that it should be based on the company practice in our country, and analyze the specific problems in detail. The purpose of the system of denying corporate personality is to prevent the abuse of corporate personality in order to protect the creditors of the company and the public interests from unlawful infringement. Article 20 of the Company Law of our country stipulates that the joint and several liability shall be borne by the shareholders. However, joint and several liability can be joint and several liability or supplementary joint liability. The law only generally stipulates joint and several liability, which makes it difficult for the judge to define the joint liability when dealing with problems in practice. As a result, only shareholders will be liable for joint and several judgments, the nature of the decision and other issues left to the implementation stage, will further complicate the issue. According to the research of scholars, the abuse of corporate personality can be divided into several common situations, such as significant capital deficiency, personality confusion, excessive control of shareholders and corporatization. Based on the theory and practice at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the responsibility of shareholders in these common cases by exploring the value pursuit of the denial system of corporate personality, in accordance with the concept of fairness and justice, and on the basis of the theory and practice at home and abroad. This paper attempts to discuss the nature of joint and several liability of shareholders and its way of undertaking through concrete analysis of specific problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐瓊;;揭開公司人格否認(rèn)理論的面紗[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2006年06期

2 陳凡;;公司法人格否認(rèn)制度在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的應(yīng)用及完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年19期

3 彭德行;;淺議我國(guó)《公司法》第20條的適用條件[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年03期

4 郭富青;論公司人格否認(rèn)原則的理論基礎(chǔ)及適用條件[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

5 趙信忠;對(duì)我國(guó)適用公司法人格否認(rèn)法理的質(zhì)疑[J];河北法學(xué);1999年04期

6 張宗敏;;公司法人格否認(rèn)中控制股東責(zé)任性質(zhì)之探討[J];河北法學(xué);2006年01期

7 李昌玉;;控制股東對(duì)第三人民事責(zé)任的性質(zhì)[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

8 朱慈蘊(yùn);公司法人格否認(rèn)法理與公司的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年05期

9 馬tD;;論公司法中的揭開公司面紗制度[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年01期

10 朱慈蘊(yùn);;公司法人格否認(rèn)：從法條躍入實(shí)踐[J];清華法學(xué);2007年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2404970