發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-19 17:10

【摘要】： 上市公司作為市場(chǎng)化程度最高涉及利益最廣泛的一種股份公司形式,不僅是公司法中的重要組成部分,也是實(shí)務(wù)操作中的比較復(fù)雜的一種組織形式。相對(duì)于有限責(zé)任公司,上市公司的規(guī)模一般較大;相對(duì)于普通的股份公司,上市公司是其中運(yùn)行良好業(yè)績(jī)優(yōu)異的一部分,公司股東的社會(huì)化、擴(kuò)大化使得利益涉及面更加廣泛。其資合性的本質(zhì)在募集了大量社會(huì)資本的同時(shí),也要求其承擔(dān)更多的責(zé)任,不僅僅是對(duì)公司的原股東,更多的是數(shù)量難以計(jì)數(shù)的中小股東。相關(guān)的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表、績(jī)效報(bào)表、重大決策、公司規(guī)劃的適當(dāng)公布不僅關(guān)乎大股東的利益,同為中小股東的利益所在。然而,由于資本多數(shù)決的存在,中小股東的話語權(quán)只能得到有限的釋放,甚或剝奪。大股東或其聯(lián)合操縱公司損害中小股東權(quán)益事件時(shí)有發(fā)生。本文旨在通過法律的途徑分析大股東和中小股東力量對(duì)比,探討通過司法介入的方式適度對(duì)中小股東權(quán)益的保護(hù)。本文試圖突破單純的討論保護(hù)中小股東,從而可能損害公司整體利益最終損害中小股東權(quán)益的癥結(jié),希望在雙方各自的正當(dāng)權(quán)益保護(hù)、大股東或其聯(lián)合控制公司運(yùn)營,追求經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和中小股東保護(hù)其自身利益之間尋求可接受的均衡,從而達(dá)到保護(hù)中小股東權(quán)益的目的。本文中只以股東派生訴訟為研究切入點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:As a kind of joint-stock company with the highest degree of marketization, it is not only an important part of company law, but also a complicated organization form in practical operation. Compared with the limited liability company, the scale of the listed company is generally larger. Compared with the ordinary stock company, the listed company is a part of the company with good performance. The socialization and expansion of the shareholders of the company make the interests more extensive. At the same time, it also requires it to bear more responsibilities, not only to the original shareholders of the company, but also to the number of small and medium shareholders. The related financial statements, performance statements, major decisions and company planning are not only related to the interests of large shareholders, but also to the interests of minority shareholders. However, due to the existence of capital majority decision, minority shareholders' right to speak can only be released, or even deprived. Major shareholders or their joint manipulation of the company damage the rights and interests of minority shareholders from time to time. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the power contrast between the large shareholders and the minority shareholders through the way of law, and to discuss the proper protection of the rights and interests of the minority shareholders through the way of judicial intervention. This paper attempts to break through the simple discussion of protecting minority shareholders, which may damage the overall interests of the company and ultimately damage the crux of the rights and interests of minority shareholders, hoping to protect the legitimate rights and interests of both sides, large shareholders or their joint control of the operation of the company. To seek an acceptable balance between the pursuit of economic interests and the protection of the interests of the minority shareholders, thus achieving the purpose of protecting the rights and interests of the minority shareholders. In this paper, only shareholders derivative litigation as a research entry point.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 傅穹;曹理;;股東派生訴訟提起權(quán)濫用防止研究——兼評(píng)2005年《公司法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年02期

2 胡曉靜;;德國股東派生訴訟制度評(píng)析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年02期

3 朱圓;;美國的股東派生訴訟制度[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年11期

4 朱欖葉;“碧純”水侵權(quán)案探討[J];法學(xué);1997年12期

5 鄧敏貞;;論股東派生訴訟制度[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年11期

6 吳一平;;股東派生訴訟之比較[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

7 張璜;;對(duì)歐洲大陸法系國家股東代表訴訟的比較與借鑒[J];傳承;2009年14期

8 彭禮明;;論我國的股東派生訴訟制度——兼評(píng)我國2005年修訂的《公司法》第一百五十二條[J];湖北財(cái)經(jīng)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

9 殷鑫;;論股東派生訴訟的訴訟費(fèi)用承擔(dān)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年09期

10 周劍龍;;日本公司法制現(xiàn)代化中的股東代表訴訟制度[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 趙旭東;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 許明白;論美國派生訴訟程序[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

2 管其義;中日股東代表訴訟制度比較研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

3 董桂武;股東派生訴訟研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

4 李守眾;論股東代表訴訟制度[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2387215