【摘要】：公司在對(duì)外經(jīng)營(yíng)發(fā)展中,股東之間難免會(huì)因?yàn)閷?duì)事務(wù)的不同決策而產(chǎn)生分歧,或者股東在管理公司事務(wù)時(shí)因個(gè)人的行為使公司陷入困境或者損害了公司的利益。股東除名制度是通過(guò)法定程序?qū)⒔獬齻�(gè)別離心股東資格使其離開(kāi)公司以解決公司內(nèi)部矛盾,有助于公司脫離困境,使公司恢復(fù)正常運(yùn)作。我國(guó)《公司法解釋(三)》第17條首次規(guī)定了特定情形下解除股東資格的規(guī)則,但該條解釋對(duì)股東除名的實(shí)體要件與程序要件都設(shè)計(jì)的較為粗淺,造成公司在適用除名制度中處于被動(dòng)地位,也使得法院在審理除名案件中缺乏具體的依據(jù)造成同案不同判的現(xiàn)象。因此,本篇論文通過(guò)從一個(gè)經(jīng)典案例引出建立股東除名制度的必要性,其次對(duì)這一概念進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要闡述,接著對(duì)我國(guó)目前所設(shè)立的股東除名的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析并通過(guò)總結(jié)案例闡明股東除名制度在實(shí)際適用時(shí)所產(chǎn)生的爭(zhēng)議,然后對(duì)域外國(guó)家主要是德國(guó)和美國(guó)的立法與司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行比較,最后側(cè)重在除名事由、除名程序以及除名后相關(guān)主體的保護(hù)救濟(jì)來(lái)完善股東除名制度。
[Abstract]:In the development of the company's external operation, it is inevitable for the shareholders to have differences because of different decisions on the affairs, or because of the personal behavior of the shareholders in managing the affairs of the company, the company gets into difficulties or damages the interests of the company. The system of shareholder delisting is to remove the individual centrifugal shareholder qualification from the company through legal procedure to solve the internal contradiction of the company and to help the company get out of the predicament and make the company return to normal operation. Article 17 of our country's Company Law interpretation (3) for the first time provides the rules for disqualification of shareholders under certain circumstances, but the interpretation of this article designs the substantive and procedural elements for the removal of shareholders from the company for the first time. As a result, the company is in a passive position in the application of delisting system, and it also makes the court lack of specific basis in the hearing of delisting cases, resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper draws the necessity of establishing the shareholder delisting system from a classic case, and then gives a brief explanation of this concept. Then it analyzes the relevant provisions of shareholder delisting established in our country and illustrates the disputes arising from the practical application of shareholder delisting system through summing up cases. Then it compares the legislation and judicial practice between Germany and the United States, and finally focuses on perfecting the shareholder delisting system in terms of the reasons for delisting, the procedure of delisting and the protection and relief of relevant subjects after delisting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李紅潤(rùn);;股東除名規(guī)則的反思與重構(gòu)[J];天津法學(xué);2016年03期

2 陳克;;再論股東除名制度中的表決權(quán)限制——從填補(bǔ)法律漏洞視角下展開(kāi)[J];法律適用;2015年12期

3 黎金;;論我國(guó)有限責(zé)任公司股東除名要件——以《公司法解釋三》為基礎(chǔ)[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年33期

4 李建偉;;有限責(zé)任公司的股東除名制度研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2015年02期

5 李紅潤(rùn);;股東除名事由規(guī)則的中國(guó)模式[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2014年11期

6 余健;;對(duì)股東除名制度的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];云南社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

7 戴中璧;;試論有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];揚(yáng)州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

8 章兢兢;;淺談我國(guó)股東除名制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年10期

9 鳳建軍;;公司股東的“除名”與“失權(quán)”:從概念到規(guī)范[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年02期

10 蔣琪;秦增光;;首例股東除名制之爭(zhēng)[J];法人;2012年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王韻;我國(guó)股東除名制度研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 許玉君;有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

3 顧文凱;我國(guó)公司股東除名之訴相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2291061