【摘要】：公司法人人格否認(rèn)制度作為衡平性的制度,在獨(dú)立人格制度更加注重形式正義的基礎(chǔ)上強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)實(shí)質(zhì)正義的保障和追求,為公司獨(dú)立人格制度更好的發(fā)揮作用提供了重要支持。公司作為市場(chǎng)的細(xì)胞是市場(chǎng)的組成部分和發(fā)展基礎(chǔ),獨(dú)立人格制度是公司制度展開(kāi)和延續(xù)的前提。公司法人格否認(rèn)制度是公司獨(dú)立人格制度的清洗劑,幫助市場(chǎng)清掃害蟲(chóng)公司,為市場(chǎng)提供清潔、健康的發(fā)展氛圍。到目前為止,公司人格否認(rèn)制度在國(guó)外某些發(fā)達(dá)法域,如美國(guó)、英國(guó)、德國(guó)和日本,擁有著幾百年的發(fā)展歷史、豐富的內(nèi)涵以及成熟的制度體系。公司人格否認(rèn)制度不是簡(jiǎn)單的一兩個(gè)法條,它是一個(gè)完整的體系。在梳理我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度之法律體系時(shí),筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段公司人格否認(rèn)制度的法律體系非常不成熟。這種不成熟集中體現(xiàn)在以下幾點(diǎn)：第一,理論上,國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者的研究廣度和深度不夠,對(duì)公司法人格否認(rèn)制度的客觀認(rèn)識(shí)和主觀判斷存在著一定的分歧,忽視了對(duì)反向刺破和姐妹公司間刺破兩種特殊公司人格否認(rèn)制度的研究,總體上講,理論體系不成熟。第二,立法狀況粗糙,現(xiàn)有法律條文簡(jiǎn)單,不成體系；法條內(nèi)涵狹窄,缺乏對(duì)反向剌破以及姐妹公司間刺破兩種特殊類型之人格否認(rèn)的規(guī)定,法律條文不明確、不清晰。第三,公司法人格否認(rèn)相關(guān)案件審判依據(jù)模糊,當(dāng)遇到特殊的公司人格否認(rèn)案件時(shí),法官缺乏對(duì)法律變通適用的勇氣,現(xiàn)有法律條文缺乏對(duì)案件判決的支撐,法理和原則成為判案的常用工具�？偨Y(jié)以上幾點(diǎn),我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段公司法人人格否認(rèn)制度立法狀況和審判實(shí)踐脫節(jié),理論研究難以支撐法律解釋和司法實(shí)踐,急需引入反向刺破以及姐妹公司間刺破兩種特殊而又重要的公司人格否認(rèn)制度類型,公司人格否認(rèn)法律體系之完善任重而道遠(yuǎn)。 總之,在法治化不斷深入和構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的今天,法律制度的完善應(yīng)該先行。具體到公司法人人格獨(dú)立領(lǐng)域,筆者認(rèn)為我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)修改當(dāng)下的相關(guān)立法,引入外部人反向人格否認(rèn)制度以及姐妹公司間人格否認(rèn)制度,以法律條文的擴(kuò)張解決現(xiàn)實(shí)中的矛盾,以法律條文的完善引導(dǎo)市場(chǎng)行為。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分,筆者以循序漸進(jìn)的方式,深入淺出地對(duì)我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度的擴(kuò)張和完善進(jìn)行探討并提出一定的建議： 第一部分,梳理公司人格否認(rèn)制度的基本理論,以公司人格否認(rèn)制度之起源和歷史延伸為參照,映射我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度之理論研究情況,對(duì)公司人格否認(rèn)制度的內(nèi)涵、特征以及價(jià)值等基本問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了歸納。將反向刺破和姐妹公司間的刺破進(jìn)行制度介紹和制度分析,希望對(duì)我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度的理論完善起到一定的作用。 第二部分,從我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),梳理我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度的立法體系,從立法和法律適用的角度檢測(cè)我國(guó)現(xiàn)有法律制度的缺陷；以司法判決作為衡量我國(guó)制度現(xiàn)狀的重要指標(biāo),從實(shí)踐中來(lái),發(fā)現(xiàn)、分析問(wèn)題,為之后的制度擴(kuò)張以及完善提供一定的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分,以公平、正義以及市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下市場(chǎng)和法律之間的互相影響的角度分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)有公司人格否認(rèn)制度擴(kuò)張和完善的必要性。以解決問(wèn)題的態(tài)度明確我國(guó)制度擴(kuò)張和完善的可行性,給我國(guó)制度完善提供充分的理論支撐。 第四部分,以兩種不同的改革指導(dǎo)思想指引兩種不同的改革路徑。溫和的以現(xiàn)有制度為基礎(chǔ)和核心,試圖以修補(bǔ)的方式進(jìn)行制度擴(kuò)張和完善；激烈的將現(xiàn)有制度和法條全面推翻,以重新立法的方式確立完善的公司人格否認(rèn)制度。 本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)主要在于,筆者改變了對(duì)我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)制度研究的一般路徑,突破傳統(tǒng)的以研究主體、客體這一邏輯路徑下的研究方式,從判決的結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題,以判決的邏輯思路分析問(wèn)題,放棄內(nèi)部人反向刺破這一英美法系更為傾向的反向刺破方式,選擇將外部人反向刺破這一英美法院看來(lái)的非常態(tài)反向刺破引入我國(guó),在一定程度上做到了對(duì)國(guó)外制度的吸收和中國(guó)化。 本文的不足： 由于對(duì)判決搜集的數(shù)量較少,再加上沒(méi)能對(duì)作出判決的法官或者是法院進(jìn)行訪問(wèn),本文的事實(shí)論證還存在著諸多問(wèn)題。除此之外,在制度的借鑒和引入方面,外語(yǔ)水平的限制也使本文的外文基礎(chǔ)資料顯得較薄弱。
[Abstract]:As an equitable system, the disregard of corporate personality emphasizes the guarantee and pursuit of substantive justice on the basis of paying more attention to formal justice in the independent personality system, which provides an important support for the better exertion of the independent personality system. The disregard of corporate personality system is the detergent of the company's independent personality system, which helps to clean up pest companies and provide a clean and healthy atmosphere for the development of the market. With hundreds of years of development history, rich connotation and mature system, the system of disregard of corporate personality is not a simple law or two, but a complete system. The immaturity is embodied in the following aspects: firstly, theoretically, the research scope and depth of domestic scholars are not enough, there are certain differences in the objective understanding and subjective judgment of the corporate personality denial system, ignoring the research on the two special corporate personality denial systems of reverse puncture and sister company puncture. Second, the legislative situation is rough, the existing legal provisions are simple and unsystematic; the content of the law is narrow, lack of provisions on reverse puncture and sister companies puncture two special types of personality denial, legal provisions are not clear, not clear. Third, the company personality denial related cases trial basis is vague, when encountering special cases. In different cases of disregard of corporate personality, judges lack the courage to apply the law flexibly, and the existing legal provisions lack the support for the judgment of the case. Jurisprudence and principles become the common tools in the judgment of the case. The interpretation and judicial practice urgently need to introduce two special and important types of corporate personality denial system: reverse puncture and sister company puncture.
In a word, the perfection of the legal system should be the first step in the process of deepening the rule of law and building a harmonious society. As far as the field of corporate personality independence is concerned, the author thinks that China should amend the current relevant legislation, introduce the system of disregard of outsiders'reverse personality and the system of disregard of personality between sister companies, and solve it with the expansion of legal provisions. The contradictions in reality lead to market behavior with the perfection of legal provisions.
This article is divided into four parts, the author in a step-by-step manner, in-depth and shallow to our country's company personality denial system expansion and improvement of the discussion and put forward some suggestions:
The first part combs the basic theory of the disregard of corporate personality system, with the origin and historical extension of the disregard of corporate personality system as a reference, reflects the theoretical research of the disregard of corporate personality system in China, and summarizes the connotation, characteristics and value of the disregard of corporate personality system. It is hoped to play a certain role in perfecting the theory of disregard of corporate personality in China by introducing and analyzing the system of disregard of corporate personality.
The second part, proceeding from the present legislative situation of the system of disregard of corporate personality in China, combs the legislative system of the system of disregard of corporate personality in China, examines the defects of the existing legal system in China from the perspective of legislation and legal application; takes judicial judgment as an important index to measure the current situation of the system in China, finds out, analyzes the problems in practice, and so on. It provides a realistic basis for the expansion and improvement of the system.
The third part analyzes the necessity of expanding and perfecting the system of disregard of corporate personality in China from the angle of equity, justice and the interaction between market and law under the market economy environment.
In the fourth part, two different reform paths are guided by two different reform guiding ideology. Moderate to the existing system as the basis and core, trying to repair the way to expand and improve the system; intense to overthrow the existing system and laws in an all-round way, to re-legislate the way to establish a sound corporate personality denial system.
The main innovation of this paper lies in that the author has changed the general path of the study on the system of disregard of corporate personality in our country, breaking through the traditional research method under the logical path of subject and object, finding problems from the result of judgment, analyzing problems with the logical thinking of judgment, abandoning the insider reverse puncturing this Anglo-American legal system is more inclined. To a certain extent, it has absorbed and Sinicized the foreign system.
The shortcomings of this article are:
Due to the small amount of judgments collected and the failure to visit the judges or the courts, there are still many problems in the factual argumentation in this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐健美;論“逆向刺破公司面紗”制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2219023