【摘要】：表決權(quán)信托作為信托在股份公司領(lǐng)域的擴(kuò)展性運用,首先于十九世紀(jì)產(chǎn)生于美國,并逐漸被大陸法系的日本、韓國和我國臺灣地區(qū)等接受。在我國,表決權(quán)信托并沒有在法律中明文規(guī)定,但是根據(jù)現(xiàn)行《信托法》、《公司法》和《證券法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定,表決權(quán)信托具備實際運用的條件,并且已有實例。作為一種工具性制度,表決權(quán)信托可以運用于中小股東保護(hù)、國有資產(chǎn)重組等領(lǐng)域。本文則從股份收購這個新的角度探討表決權(quán)信托,全文共分四章。 第一章股份收購及表決權(quán)信托概述,主要介紹股份收購及表決權(quán)信托的基本內(nèi)容,以及表決權(quán)信托運用于善意收購和惡意收購的簡要分析。本章目的在于為之后的分析奠定理論基礎(chǔ)和限定研究范圍。 第二章表決權(quán)信托運用于股份收購之合理性推演,先闡明表決權(quán)信托具備利益衡平的功能和股份收購中存在的基本矛盾,然后利用矛盾分析和法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的方法將表決權(quán)信托運用在這些基本矛盾的解決中。本章目的在于表明表決權(quán)信托對于解決股份收購中可能出現(xiàn)問題的積極意義。 第三章表決權(quán)信托運用于股份收購的實踐,先簡要介紹了表決權(quán)信托在美國產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的坎坷過程以及美國聯(lián)邦法和州法中的相關(guān)規(guī)定。然后介紹了表決權(quán)信托在德國、日本、韓國和我國臺灣地區(qū)法律和實踐中的具體表現(xiàn),最后重點分析了我國目前的制度和市場狀況,并通過兩個典型案例說明了表決權(quán)信托的實際操作方式。本章目的在于表明表決權(quán)信托對于股份收購的可行性。 第四章表決權(quán)信托運用于我國的法律建構(gòu),主要勾勒出表決權(quán)信托作為一種法律制度應(yīng)當(dāng)具備的基本要素:成立與生效的條件、法律關(guān)系中相關(guān)當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利和義務(wù)以及表決權(quán)信托法律關(guān)系終止的條件和效果。本章是在第三章可行性分析的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行制度建構(gòu),以保障表決權(quán)信托運用的效力和保護(hù)相關(guān)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:As an extension of trust in the field of joint-stock companies, the voting trust was first developed in the United States in the 19th century and gradually accepted by Japan, Korea and Taiwan in the continental law system. In our country, voting trust is not explicitly stipulated in the law, but according to the relevant provisions of the current Trust Law, Company Law and Securities Law, the voting trust has the conditions to be applied in practice and has already been given examples. As a tool system, voting trust can be applied to the protection of minority shareholders and the reorganization of state-owned assets. This paper discusses voting trust from the new perspective of share acquisition, the full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of share acquisition and voting trust, which mainly introduces the basic contents of share acquisition and voting trust, and the brief analysis of the application of voting trust in bona fide and hostile takeover. The purpose of this chapter is to lay a theoretical foundation and limit the scope of research for the subsequent analysis. Chapter II applies the voting trust to the rational deduction of share acquisition, and first clarifies that the voting trust has the function of equalizing interests and the basic contradictions existing in the acquisition of shares. Then the voting trust is applied to the solution of these basic contradictions by means of contradiction analysis and law and economics. The purpose of this chapter is to show the positive significance of voting trust in solving the possible problems in share acquisition. The third chapter is about the application of voting trust in stock acquisition. Firstly, it briefly introduces the bumpy process of the emergence and development of voting trust in the United States and the relevant provisions of the federal and state laws of the United States. Then it introduces the specific performance of voting trust in the laws and practices of Germany, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, and finally analyzes the current system and market situation of our country. And through two typical cases to illustrate the voting trust of the actual operation. The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the feasibility of voting trust for share acquisition. Chapter IV applies voting trust to the legal construction of our country, mainly outlines the basic elements of voting trust as a kind of legal system: the conditions for its establishment and effectiveness. The rights and obligations of the relevant parties and the conditions and effects of the termination of the legal relationship of voting trust in legal relations. This chapter is based on the feasibility analysis of the third chapter to build a system to protect the effectiveness of the use of voting trust and protect the legitimate rights and interests of relevant parties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.282

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈丹林;公司兼并、收購、合并、并購法律辨析[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2001年02期

2 王熙亮;淺述企業(yè)兼并及兼并中的律師業(yè)務(wù)[J];中國司法;2002年04期

3 梁上上;論表決權(quán)信托[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

4 覃有土,陳雪萍;表決權(quán)信托:控制權(quán)優(yōu)化配置機(jī)制[J];法商研究;2005年04期

5 白玉琴;評我國證券法第四章“上市公司收購”[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年04期

6 郇志茹;;表決權(quán)信托之理論正當(dāng)性證明[J];法學(xué);2007年10期

7 韓斌;上市公司收購概念析論[J];法學(xué);1997年09期

8 鄧峰;;淺論股東表決權(quán)信托法律關(guān)系的客體[J];貴陽學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

9 朱春葉;;狙擊表決權(quán)行使和收益權(quán)的分離——以外觀為視角析境外之相關(guān)規(guī)制[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

10 中野正俊;漆丹;;股東表決權(quán)的信托行使[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2003年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 漆丹;我國股份公司股東表決權(quán)信托之法律問題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2006年

2 雷曉冰;表決權(quán)信托制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王麗萍;論美國法上的“表決權(quán)信托”及對我國的借鑒意義[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

2 趙國富;我國引入表決權(quán)信托制度之思考[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 楊建明;股東表決權(quán)信托制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

4 郭美娜;股東表決權(quán)信托的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2218898