【摘要】：關(guān)聯(lián)交易中,交易行為的效力規(guī)則是實(shí)現(xiàn)關(guān)聯(lián)交易當(dāng)事人權(quán)益的重要規(guī)則之一,甚至可以說,關(guān)聯(lián)交易法律領(lǐng)域中的首要問題就在于建立關(guān)聯(lián)交易效力的適當(dāng)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。遺憾的是,我國(guó)公司法上并沒有該制度的構(gòu)建。本文擬通過中外比較研究,結(jié)合我國(guó)公司法存在的問題,提出修改建議,以期盡早建立關(guān)聯(lián)交易效力要件體系。 本文正文共分為四部分,主要內(nèi)容為: 第一部分是研究對(duì)象的界定。主要分析了關(guān)聯(lián)交易的概念及特征;在區(qū)分董事關(guān)聯(lián)交易和控制股東關(guān)聯(lián)交易的基礎(chǔ)上,將主體限定在董事范圍上;最后將研究對(duì)象縮小至關(guān)聯(lián)交易的效力之上,以明確本文對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)交易的研究領(lǐng)域。 第二部分從合同法的角度分析關(guān)聯(lián)交易的效力適用。關(guān)聯(lián)交易雖發(fā)生在公司法領(lǐng)域,但其本質(zhì)仍屬合同,故有適用合同效力的可能性。筆者具體分析了合同無效、可撤銷情形下效力的適用。 第三部分是本文的重點(diǎn)。筆者有針對(duì)性的節(jié)選英、美、日、法等域外國(guó)家對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)交易強(qiáng)制披露、批準(zhǔn)、實(shí)質(zhì)公平效力要件的規(guī)定,引出我國(guó)公司法關(guān)聯(lián)交易的現(xiàn)狀,并進(jìn)一步揭露出我國(guó)公司法在規(guī)制關(guān)聯(lián)交易效力問題上存在的諸多不足。 第四部分針對(duì)我國(guó)關(guān)聯(lián)交易效力要件存在的不足,從立法和司法兩個(gè)層面提出建議。在立法上,應(yīng)確立披露、實(shí)質(zhì)公平、無利害關(guān)系董事會(huì)批準(zhǔn)效力要件的法律地位;在司法上,應(yīng)積極發(fā)揮司法能動(dòng)性,補(bǔ)充“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)性”規(guī)范規(guī)制關(guān)聯(lián)交易的不足。 結(jié)語對(duì)本文所述內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了總結(jié),闡述了研究董事關(guān)聯(lián)交易效力要件的意義和價(jià)值,并提出了有待繼續(xù)探討和研究的問題。
[Abstract]:In the related party transaction, the validity rule of transaction behavior is one of the important rules to realize the rights and interests of the party concerned in the related party transaction. Even, the primary problem in the related party transaction law field is to establish the appropriate criterion of the validity of the related party transaction. Unfortunately, there is no such system in our company law. Based on the comparative study between China and foreign countries and the problems existing in our company law, this paper puts forward some suggestions to set up the effective elements system of related party transactions as soon as possible. This text is divided into four parts, the main content is: the first part is the definition of the object of study. This paper mainly analyzes the concept and characteristics of related party transaction; on the basis of distinguishing director related party transaction from controlling shareholder related party transaction, it limits the subject to director scope; finally, it narrows the object of study to the effect of related party transaction. In order to clarify the research area of related party transactions in this paper. The second part analyzes the validity of related party transactions from the angle of contract law. Although the related party transaction occurs in the field of company law, its essence is still a contract, so it is possible to apply the contract effect. The author analyzes the application of the validity under the circumstances of invalidity and revocability of the contract. The third part is the focus of this paper. The author extracts the provisions of compulsory disclosure, approval and substantial fairness of related party transactions from foreign countries, such as Britain, the United States, Japan, and France, which lead to the present situation of related party transactions in China's Company Law. And further reveals that our company law has many shortcomings in regulating the effectiveness of related party transactions. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some suggestions from the aspects of legislation and judicature in view of the deficiency of the effective elements of related party transactions in our country. In legislation, it is necessary to establish the legal status of disclosure, substantive fairness, and approval by the board of directors without interest. In the judicial field, the judicial initiative should be actively brought into play to supplement the deficiency of "standard" regulation of related party transactions. The conclusion summarizes the contents of this paper, expounds the significance and value of the research on the effective elements of the director's related transactions, and puts forward some problems to be further discussed and studied.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程樺;;上市公司關(guān)聯(lián)交易中公平原則的運(yùn)用[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年08期

2 王保樹;;公司社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)公司法理論的影響[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年03期

3 李文莉;;上市公司關(guān)聯(lián)交易的法律規(guī)制與監(jiān)管[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2011年10期

4 馬磊;王學(xué)飛;;從關(guān)聯(lián)交易看臺(tái)資企業(yè)在中國(guó)大陸上市的主要法律障礙[J];科技致富向?qū)?2011年26期

5 劉蕭嘉;;論公司董事的信托義務(wù)[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年06期

6 李有星;;我國(guó)上市公司借貸規(guī)制的再思考:禁止借貸得與失[J];證券法苑;2010年02期

7 高婭;;2008年公司法律論壇會(huì)議紀(jì)要[J];公司法律評(píng)論;2009年00期

8 趙磊;;“借殼上市”之法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

9 林蔚;;應(yīng)該立法保護(hù)記者[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2157204