【摘要】：現(xiàn)代公司決策普遍采取“資本多數(shù)決”原則,這一原則雖體現(xiàn)了股東民主、資本平等的理念,但在發(fā)生對(duì)股東的利害關(guān)系產(chǎn)生重大影響的公司變更時(shí),如何既保護(hù)少數(shù)異議股東的權(quán)利,又不影響公司的正常經(jīng)營(yíng)和穩(wěn)定發(fā)展,成為一個(gè)急需解決的問(wèn)題。在公司發(fā)生基礎(chǔ)性重大變化時(shí),賦予異議股東一項(xiàng)權(quán)利,使異議股東有權(quán)要求公司以公平價(jià)格收買去股份,從而退出公司,此謂“異議股東股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)”。該請(qǐng)求權(quán)起源于美國(guó),經(jīng)過(guò)一百多年的發(fā)展演進(jìn),現(xiàn)已被世界上大多數(shù)國(guó)家采用,其中尤以美國(guó)的相關(guān)制度最為成熟、完善。該制度旨在平衡多數(shù)股東和少數(shù)股東的利益,并最終實(shí)現(xiàn)公平和效率的平衡,是對(duì)“資本多數(shù)決”的補(bǔ)充和匡正,是一項(xiàng)對(duì)少數(shù)股東保護(hù)的有效措施。 我國(guó)于2005年新修訂的《公司法》中引入了“異議股東股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)”,無(wú)疑是一大進(jìn)步。然而,立法僅僅對(duì)股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)進(jìn)行了原則性的規(guī)定,缺乏明確性和具體性,實(shí)踐操作不強(qiáng),尚待立法的進(jìn)一步完善。本文以異議股東股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的基本原理出發(fā),通過(guò)比較我國(guó)《公司法》的規(guī)定與各國(guó)的立法例,對(duì)其適用范圍、行使程序等諸多問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析,并結(jié)合我國(guó)的國(guó)情和立法現(xiàn)狀提出了完善我國(guó)異議股東股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度的建議,使其能夠在我國(guó)當(dāng)前的立法和實(shí)踐背景下有效地運(yùn)作。
[Abstract]:The principle of "capital majority decision" is generally adopted in modern company decision-making. Although this principle embodies the concept of shareholder democracy and capital equality, when the company changes which have a significant impact on shareholders' interests, How to protect the rights of minority dissenting shareholders without affecting the normal operation and stable development of the company has become an urgent problem. When the fundamental and important changes take place in the company, the dissenting shareholders are given a right to ask the company to buy the shares at a fair price, thus withdrawing from the company, which is called the "right of claim for share repurchase by the dissenting shareholders". The right of claim originated in the United States, after more than 100 years of development and evolution, has been adopted by most countries in the world, especially the relevant system of the United States is the most mature and perfect. This system aims at balancing the interests of majority shareholders and minority shareholders, and finally realizes the balance of equity and efficiency. It is a supplement and correction to "capital majority decision" and an effective measure to protect minority shareholders. In 2005, China introduced the "right of claim for share repurchase of dissenting shareholders" in the newly revised Company Law, which is undoubtedly a great progress. However, the legislation only provides for the right of share repurchase in principle, which lacks clarity and specificity, and is not strong in practice, so it needs to be further improved by legislation. Based on the basic principle of the claim right of dissenting shareholders' share repurchase, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the scope of application, exercise procedure and so on by comparing the provisions of China's Company Law with the legislative examples of various countries. According to the situation of our country and the current situation of legislation, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of claim for share repurchase by dissenting shareholders, so that it can operate effectively under the background of current legislation and practice in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甘培忠;論股東派生訴訟在中國(guó)的有效適用[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

2 吳志宇;;論股份回購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];北方論叢;2007年02期

3 聞德鋒,梁三利;論公司股東股份收購(gòu)請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];商業(yè)研究;2005年13期

4 陳芳;;對(duì)我國(guó)累積投票制度的反思——兼評(píng)《公司法》第106條之規(guī)定[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

5 程功,陸佳;上市公司中小股東利益的保護(hù)與《公司法》的完善[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2002年S1期

6 魏磊杰;;論美國(guó)公司法中的異議股東股份評(píng)估權(quán)制度[J];研究生法學(xué);2006年03期

7 鮑為民;美國(guó)法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

8 孫聚團(tuán);淺議有限責(zé)任公司股東的退股權(quán)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年06期

9 程合紅;試論股權(quán)的客體——物、股份、公司[J];法學(xué);2000年01期

10 高漢;;股份回購(gòu)及中小股東權(quán)益保護(hù)分析[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2140286