【摘要】：擅長經(jīng)營管理的公司經(jīng)理在公司發(fā)展中的價(jià)值不容小視,已經(jīng)處于公司運(yùn)營的核心。在競爭激烈的市場中,公司的營利性客觀上要求擴(kuò)張并保障經(jīng)理權(quán)力以提高效率。但是,權(quán)力趨于腐敗是被實(shí)踐證明了的一般規(guī)律,個(gè)人私欲驅(qū)使經(jīng)理越權(quán)行事,給公司和第三人帶來利益上的巨大損失。經(jīng)理法律地位多元,充當(dāng)了代理人、輔助公司機(jī)關(guān)等角色,享有法律和公司賦予的經(jīng)理權(quán)。我國公司經(jīng)理法律制度存在缺陷,主要體現(xiàn)在經(jīng)理權(quán)制度沒有得到很好體現(xiàn)、對經(jīng)理越權(quán)行為效力判斷不清晰、民事責(zé)任立法存在缺陷等。同時(shí),我國公司發(fā)展有其特殊的背景和現(xiàn)狀,公司內(nèi)部治理也不夠完善,主要體現(xiàn)在對公司章程作用重視不夠等方面。法律制度缺陷和公司內(nèi)部約束不足直接導(dǎo)致經(jīng)理越權(quán)行為屢禁不止。這也使得適當(dāng)約束經(jīng)理權(quán)力,控制經(jīng)理行為,成為完善《公司法》和創(chuàng)新公司治理模式中的重要課題。因此,結(jié)合我國具體實(shí)踐,應(yīng)當(dāng)以完善法律制度和發(fā)揮公司自治約束作用為主導(dǎo)機(jī)制來約束經(jīng)理行為。法律規(guī)制應(yīng)當(dāng)兼顧效率和安全,主要通過厘清經(jīng)理權(quán)范圍、加強(qiáng)經(jīng)理對公司和第三人的民事責(zé)任及其可訴性、完善法律追究機(jī)制等措施,充分發(fā)揮法律約束機(jī)制的作用。公司則應(yīng)該通過完善公司章程、合同和公司內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)等途徑對經(jīng)理越權(quán)行為進(jìn)行事前預(yù)防,通過訴訟手段和內(nèi)部解決機(jī)制進(jìn)行事后救濟(jì)。總之,構(gòu)建既能滿足公司經(jīng)營管理的需要,又能防止經(jīng)理越權(quán)行為所產(chǎn)生的各種問題的制衡機(jī)制,對經(jīng)理制度的合理建構(gòu)和有效運(yùn)作具有根本意義。
[Abstract]:The value of the manager in the development of the company is not to be underestimated, and it is already at the core of the company. In a competitive market, the company's profitability objectively requires expansion and protection of manager power to improve efficiency. However, the corruption of power is a general rule that has been proved by practice. Personal selfish desire drives managers to act in excess of their power and bring great losses to the interests of the company and the third party. The legal status of manager is diverse, acting as agent and auxiliary agency, and enjoying the legal and corporate power of manager. There are some defects in the legal system of company manager in our country, which are mainly reflected in the fact that the system of manager's right has not been well reflected, the judgment on the effectiveness of manager's overstepping action is not clear, and the legislation of civil liability has defects, etc. At the same time, the development of our company has its special background and present situation, and the internal governance of the company is not perfect, which is mainly reflected in the lack of attention to the role of the articles of association. The defects of the legal system and the inadequacies of the internal restriction of the company directly lead to the repeated prohibition of the manager's ultra vires. It also makes it an important task to restrict the manager's power and control the manager's behavior in perfecting Company Law and innovating the corporate governance model. Therefore, according to the concrete practice of our country, we should take perfecting the legal system and exerting the restraint function of the company autonomy as the leading mechanism to restrain the manager behavior. Legal regulation should take into account the efficiency and safety, mainly by clarifying the scope of the manager's right, strengthening the civil liability of the manager to the company and the third party and its actionable nature, perfecting the mechanism of legal investigation, and giving full play to the role of the legal restraint mechanism. On the other hand, the company should prevent managers from overstepping their powers by perfecting the articles of association, contracts and internal governance structure of the company, and remedy afterwards by means of litigation and internal settlement mechanism. In short, the construction can not only meet the needs of the company management, but also prevent the managers from exceeding their powers. It is of fundamental significance to the rational construction and effective operation of the manager system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉細(xì)良;;論我國公司經(jīng)理民事責(zé)任制度之完善[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2006年04期

2 王保樹,錢玉林;經(jīng)理法律地位之比較研究[J];法學(xué)評論;2002年02期

3 李建華,許中緣;表見代表及其適用——兼評《合同法》第50條[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

4 樊云慧;公司經(jīng)理權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];河北法學(xué);2005年07期

5 吳清旺;代理法范式比較研究——在兩大法系融合的語境下,重構(gòu)代理制度的新視角[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2004年02期

6 程宗璋;;公司經(jīng)理權(quán)的濫用和公司治理機(jī)制的重建[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2002年24期

7 趙萬一;宋時(shí)波;;公司經(jīng)理權(quán)的界定及其在我國的法律完善[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2006年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳威;論公司法中的經(jīng)理制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 謝梅;公司經(jīng)理權(quán)法律保護(hù)研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2006年

3 吳偉央;公司經(jīng)理地位的異化及回歸[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2132610