發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-18 16:21

【摘要】：公司法上出資形式的探討具有理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義,其中的債權(quán)出資是出資形式中理論界頗具爭(zhēng)議的問(wèn)題,以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資是債權(quán)出資的重要分類,也是債權(quán)出資實(shí)務(wù)中涉水較淺的領(lǐng)域。目前,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《公司法》的規(guī)定很模糊,理論界對(duì)債權(quán)出資問(wèn)題仍有爭(zhēng)議,實(shí)踐中也多為禁止,這與當(dāng)今愈加寬松的國(guó)內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境以及逐步放寬限制的國(guó)外立法趨勢(shì)顯然不合。鑒于當(dāng)前實(shí)務(wù)部門如火如荼地在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)的開(kāi)展債權(quán)出資調(diào)查研究這一現(xiàn)狀,多種形勢(shì)的催促之下,筆者將以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資作為單獨(dú)對(duì)象加以研究,以求對(duì)今后實(shí)務(wù)登記有所借鑒,亦成為理論研究的有益補(bǔ)充。 本文結(jié)合了多種研究方法,其中運(yùn)用較多的是比較分析法、經(jīng)濟(jì)分析和價(jià)值分析相結(jié)合、實(shí)證演繹的方法,力求通過(guò)對(duì)基本理論的梳理,研究以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資的概念、性質(zhì)和可行性,分析出資風(fēng)險(xiǎn),系統(tǒng)探討該出資行為的影響與責(zé)任,進(jìn)而為我國(guó)構(gòu)建以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)制度設(shè)計(jì)和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范提出自己的看法和建議。 本文分為四章。第一章闡述以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資的一般法理基礎(chǔ),包括概念、分類和性質(zhì),分析與一般出資形式、“債轉(zhuǎn)股”出資形式的區(qū)別之處。筆者還從適格性、制度兼容性和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義等方面系統(tǒng)分析出資可行性,特別是以我國(guó)現(xiàn)行公司法理念、公司法基本原則以及商法目的等宏觀視角審視以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資現(xiàn)象,得出可行結(jié)論。這些構(gòu)成了接下來(lái)論述的基礎(chǔ)。 第二章是關(guān)于出資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與影響的論述,分析出資風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并從出資當(dāng)事人和公司、公司債權(quán)人以及社會(huì)等多個(gè)獨(dú)特角度,特別是以當(dāng)前各國(guó)政府和社會(huì)各界都十分關(guān)注的公司社會(huì)責(zé)任這一特殊視角,系統(tǒng)分析該出資行為對(duì)公司內(nèi)部和外部引發(fā)的影響與責(zé)任,作為制度設(shè)計(jì)的前期準(zhǔn)備。 第三章,考察了國(guó)外立法實(shí)踐,評(píng)判和分析英美法系、大陸法系不同制度下的做法,借鑒國(guó)外好的經(jīng)驗(yàn);從立法、司法、行政和社會(huì)企業(yè)等方面,談國(guó)內(nèi)立法現(xiàn)狀與實(shí)務(wù)態(tài)度;最后進(jìn)行制度的反思。 第四章是以對(duì)第三人債權(quán)出資制度的構(gòu)建。筆者基于對(duì)公司實(shí)務(wù)和社會(huì)需求的尊重,一方面,正面研究出資范圍、資本實(shí)收標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和出資程序等實(shí)務(wù)操作;另一方面,提出出資擔(dān)保、公司內(nèi)部特殊義務(wù)的構(gòu)建與責(zé)任配置、出資特殊限制、評(píng)估責(zé)任分配機(jī)制、社會(huì)監(jiān)控等風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范規(guī)制的看法和建議。
[Abstract]:It is of theoretical value and practical significance to probe into the form of capital contribution in company law, in which the contribution of creditor's rights is a controversial issue in the theoretical circle of the form of capital contribution, and the contribution of creditor's rights to the third party is an important classification of the contribution of creditor's rights. It is also a shallow area in the practice of creditor's rights contribution. At present, the current provisions of the Company Law in our country are very vague, and there are still disputes among the theoretical circles on the issue of creditor's rights and contributions, and most of them are prohibited in practice. This is clearly at odds with today's increasingly relaxed domestic economic environment and the gradual relaxation of foreign legislation. In view of the current situation that the practical departments are in full swing to carry out the investigation and study of creditor's rights in the whole country, under the urge of various situations, the author will take the contribution of the third party's creditor's rights as a separate object to study. In order to practice registration in the future reference, but also become a useful supplement to theoretical research. This paper combines a variety of research methods, including comparative analysis, economic analysis and value analysis, empirical deductive method, through combing the basic theory, to study the third party creditor's rights to contribute the concept. In this paper, the author analyzes the risk of capital contribution, systematically discusses the influence and responsibility of the investment behavior, and puts forward his own views and suggestions for the construction of the third party creditor's rights system design and risk prevention in our country. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter expounds the general legal basis of the capital contribution to the third party's creditor's rights, including the concept, classification and nature, the difference between the analysis and the general form of capital contribution and the form of "debt-for-equity" contribution. The author also systematically analyzes the feasibility of capital contribution from the aspects of suitability, system compatibility and practical significance, especially from the macro angle of view, such as the concept of current company law, the basic principles of company law and the purpose of commercial law, to examine the phenomenon of creditor's rights contribution to the third party. Draw a feasible conclusion. These constitute the basis of the following discussion. The second chapter discusses the risk and influence of capital contribution, analyzes the risk of capital contribution, and from the parties and companies, corporate creditors and society, and other unique perspectives, Especially from the perspective of corporate social responsibility which is paid great attention to by governments and all walks of life, this paper systematically analyzes the influence and responsibility caused by the investment behavior on the internal and external of the company, as a preliminary preparation for the design of the system. The third chapter reviews the foreign legislative practice, judges and analyzes the practices under the different systems of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and draws lessons from the good experience of foreign countries, and discusses the current situation and practical attitude of domestic legislation from the aspects of legislation, judicature, administration and social enterprise, etc. Finally, the system of reflection. The fourth chapter is the construction of the system of the third party's creditor's rights. Based on the respect for the practical and social needs of the company, on the one hand, the author positively studies the scope of capital contribution, the standard of capital collection and the procedure of capital contribution; on the other hand, the author puts forward the contribution guarantee, the construction and responsibility allocation of the special obligations within the company. Views and suggestions on the regulation of risk prevention, such as special limitation of capital contribution, mechanism of allocation of assessment responsibility, social supervision and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 茹艷爽;;國(guó)際商事仲裁第三人制度研究[J];學(xué)理論;2011年21期

2 李越;李艷;;獨(dú)立審計(jì)下注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師對(duì)第三人的民事責(zé)任研究[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2011年17期

3 孫文楨;;論我國(guó)未來(lái)民法典中債法的制度結(jié)構(gòu)[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

4 馬立釗;;規(guī)范競(jìng)合還是規(guī)范沖突——《合同法》第51條與第150條之規(guī)范分析[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2011年04期

5 楊寧寧;;無(wú)權(quán)處分和善意取得制度的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];河南商業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

6 劉家安;;“要物合同”概念之探究[J];比較法研究;2011年04期

7 楊海涌;;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動(dòng)的交付——物權(quán)法23條與合同法第133條之比較分析[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年04期

8 柏欣利;;中國(guó)實(shí)證法對(duì)物權(quán)行為的立場(chǎng)辨析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

9 劉麗敏;魏愛(ài)江;;《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》之無(wú)權(quán)處分考析——從傳統(tǒng)民法角度分析[J];河北學(xué)刊;2011年04期

10 安靜;;論我國(guó)《合同法》上的無(wú)權(quán)處分制度[J];青春歲月;2011年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 盧建輝;;雇員遭受第三人損害第三人賠償不足部分雇主應(yīng)否賠償[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○○九年第2輯）[C];2009年

2 周曉娟;;喚醒“沉睡的財(cái)富”——第三人力資源開(kāi)發(fā)的幾點(diǎn)期待[A];陜西省“家庭·健康·和諧”研討會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];2004年

3 呂漢陽(yáng);;略論第三人權(quán)益救濟(jì)制度[A];政府采購(gòu)改革與國(guó)際化研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

4 張麗燕;;試論第三人侵害夫妻身份權(quán)的損害賠償——兼評(píng)我國(guó)婚姻法離婚過(guò)錯(cuò)賠償制度[A];中國(guó)民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

5 郭慶珠;;政府信息公開(kāi)中第三人權(quán)利救濟(jì)的制度進(jìn)路思考——以《政府信息公開(kāi)條例》第一案為引子[A];中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2009年年會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2009年

6 呂尚敏;;行政許可第三人權(quán)益保護(hù)模式之重建[A];中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2008年年會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2008年

7 廖宏;;論保險(xiǎn)代位求償權(quán)[A];甘肅保險(xiǎn)論文集[C];2004年

8 何其榮;;權(quán)利擔(dān)保與二重買賣[A];第二屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年

9 侯國(guó)躍;;關(guān)于合同概念與《合同法》適用對(duì)象的思考[A];第三屆中國(guó)律師論壇論文集（實(shí)務(wù)卷）[C];2003年

10 董t，

本文編號(hào)：2132470