公司法上以對第三人債權(quán)出資法律問題研究
[Abstract]:It is of theoretical value and practical significance to probe into the form of capital contribution in company law, in which the contribution of creditor's rights is a controversial issue in the theoretical circle of the form of capital contribution, and the contribution of creditor's rights to the third party is an important classification of the contribution of creditor's rights. It is also a shallow area in the practice of creditor's rights contribution. At present, the current provisions of the Company Law in our country are very vague, and there are still disputes among the theoretical circles on the issue of creditor's rights and contributions, and most of them are prohibited in practice. This is clearly at odds with today's increasingly relaxed domestic economic environment and the gradual relaxation of foreign legislation. In view of the current situation that the practical departments are in full swing to carry out the investigation and study of creditor's rights in the whole country, under the urge of various situations, the author will take the contribution of the third party's creditor's rights as a separate object to study. In order to practice registration in the future reference, but also become a useful supplement to theoretical research. This paper combines a variety of research methods, including comparative analysis, economic analysis and value analysis, empirical deductive method, through combing the basic theory, to study the third party creditor's rights to contribute the concept. In this paper, the author analyzes the risk of capital contribution, systematically discusses the influence and responsibility of the investment behavior, and puts forward his own views and suggestions for the construction of the third party creditor's rights system design and risk prevention in our country. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter expounds the general legal basis of the capital contribution to the third party's creditor's rights, including the concept, classification and nature, the difference between the analysis and the general form of capital contribution and the form of "debt-for-equity" contribution. The author also systematically analyzes the feasibility of capital contribution from the aspects of suitability, system compatibility and practical significance, especially from the macro angle of view, such as the concept of current company law, the basic principles of company law and the purpose of commercial law, to examine the phenomenon of creditor's rights contribution to the third party. Draw a feasible conclusion. These constitute the basis of the following discussion. The second chapter discusses the risk and influence of capital contribution, analyzes the risk of capital contribution, and from the parties and companies, corporate creditors and society, and other unique perspectives, Especially from the perspective of corporate social responsibility which is paid great attention to by governments and all walks of life, this paper systematically analyzes the influence and responsibility caused by the investment behavior on the internal and external of the company, as a preliminary preparation for the design of the system. The third chapter reviews the foreign legislative practice, judges and analyzes the practices under the different systems of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and draws lessons from the good experience of foreign countries, and discusses the current situation and practical attitude of domestic legislation from the aspects of legislation, judicature, administration and social enterprise, etc. Finally, the system of reflection. The fourth chapter is the construction of the system of the third party's creditor's rights. Based on the respect for the practical and social needs of the company, on the one hand, the author positively studies the scope of capital contribution, the standard of capital collection and the procedure of capital contribution; on the other hand, the author puts forward the contribution guarantee, the construction and responsibility allocation of the special obligations within the company. Views and suggestions on the regulation of risk prevention, such as special limitation of capital contribution, mechanism of allocation of assessment responsibility, social supervision and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D922.291.91
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 茹艷爽;;國際商事仲裁第三人制度研究[J];學(xué)理論;2011年21期
2 李越;李艷;;獨(dú)立審計下注冊會計師對第三人的民事責(zé)任研究[J];財政監(jiān)督;2011年17期
3 孫文楨;;論我國未來民法典中債法的制度結(jié)構(gòu)[J];重慶三峽學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年05期
4 馬立釗;;規(guī)范競合還是規(guī)范沖突——《合同法》第51條與第150條之規(guī)范分析[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2011年04期
5 楊寧寧;;無權(quán)處分和善意取得制度的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];河南商業(yè)高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2011年03期
6 劉家安;;“要物合同”概念之探究[J];比較法研究;2011年04期
7 楊海涌;;論動產(chǎn)物權(quán)變動的交付——物權(quán)法23條與合同法第133條之比較分析[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2011年04期
8 柏欣利;;中國實證法對物權(quán)行為的立場辨析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年04期
9 劉麗敏;魏愛江;;《中華人民共和國合同法》之無權(quán)處分考析——從傳統(tǒng)民法角度分析[J];河北學(xué)刊;2011年04期
10 安靜;;論我國《合同法》上的無權(quán)處分制度[J];青春歲月;2011年12期
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 盧建輝;;雇員遭受第三人損害第三人賠償不足部分雇主應(yīng)否賠償[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇(二○○九年第2輯)[C];2009年
2 周曉娟;;喚醒“沉睡的財富”——第三人力資源開發(fā)的幾點(diǎn)期待[A];陜西省“家庭·健康·和諧”研討會論文摘要匯編[C];2004年
3 呂漢陽;;略論第三人權(quán)益救濟(jì)制度[A];政府采購改革與國際化研討會論文集[C];2007年
4 張麗燕;;試論第三人侵害夫妻身份權(quán)的損害賠償——兼評我國婚姻法離婚過錯賠償制度[A];中國民商法實務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年
5 郭慶珠;;政府信息公開中第三人權(quán)利救濟(jì)的制度進(jìn)路思考——以《政府信息公開條例》第一案為引子[A];中國法學(xué)會行政法學(xué)研究會2009年年會論文集(下冊)[C];2009年
6 呂尚敏;;行政許可第三人權(quán)益保護(hù)模式之重建[A];中國法學(xué)會行政法學(xué)研究會2008年年會論文集(下冊)[C];2008年
7 廖宏;;論保險代位求償權(quán)[A];甘肅保險論文集[C];2004年
8 何其榮;;權(quán)利擔(dān)保與二重買賣[A];第二屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年
9 侯國躍;;關(guān)于合同概念與《合同法》適用對象的思考[A];第三屆中國律師論壇論文集(實務(wù)卷)[C];2003年
10 董t,
本文編號:2132470
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2132470.html