本文選題：公司對外擔(dān)保 + 公司章程��； 參考：《商場現(xiàn)代化》2014年09期

【摘要】：我國《公司法》第16條之規(guī)定對理解公司對外擔(dān)保與公司章程的關(guān)系,存在諸多分歧。本文認(rèn)為對其的解釋應(yīng)為:公司原則上有權(quán)對外進(jìn)行擔(dān)保,不受章程限制,公司章程明確禁止公司對外擔(dān)保的,公司不得對外擔(dān)保,但不得對抗善意第三人;公司章程對擔(dān)保金額有限制規(guī)定的,超額部分無效或在擔(dān)保決策程序符合章程修改程序的情形下有效;公司章程規(guī)定了對公司對外擔(dān)保的決策機(jī)關(guān)的,公司應(yīng)當(dāng)遵守,但不得對抗善意第三人;公司對"利害關(guān)系人"進(jìn)行擔(dān)保時,未實(shí)行"回避"或者未經(jīng)股東會、股東大會決議的,擔(dān)保無效,但不可對抗善意第三人。
[Abstract]:There are many differences in understanding the relationship between company guarantee and articles of association in Article 16 of Company Law of our country. This article holds that the interpretation should be as follows: the company has the right to guarantee to the outside in principle and is not restricted by the articles of association. If the articles of association explicitly prohibit the guarantee of the company from the outside, the company may not guarantee to the outside, but not against the bona fide third party; Where the articles of association limit the amount of the guarantee, the excess part is invalid or is effective if the guarantee decision-making procedure complies with the procedures for modifying the articles of association; if the articles of association provide for the decision-making organ of the company's external guarantee, the company shall abide by it, However, the guarantee shall not be effective against the bona fide third party; if the company has not "evaded" the "interested party" or has not made a resolution of the shareholders' meeting or the shareholders' general meeting, the guarantee shall be invalid, but it may not be opposed to the bona fide third party.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)民商法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 趙德勇;宋剛;;關(guān)于公司對外擔(dān)保的法律問題[J];理論探索;2007年02期

2 劉玲伶;;章程對公司對外擔(dān)保的效力影響[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 艾素君;;第三人對保賠協(xié)會直接訴訟的立法規(guī)定與司法實(shí)踐:英美法視角[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評論;2006年01期

2 柳劍晗;;試論合同保全措施[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年02期

3 聶早早;;簡論債權(quán)人代位權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

4 羅光飛,陳偉;論違約與精神損害賠償[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期

5 柯華慶;格式合同的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];比較法研究;2004年05期

6 張杰;戚t，

本文編號：2092564