本文選題：董事責(zé)任 + 責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn),全稱(chēng)為“公司董事和高級(jí)職員責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)(Directors Officers Liability Insurance)",是以董事、經(jīng)理向公司或第三者(股東、債權(quán)人等)承擔(dān)民事賠償責(zé)任為保險(xiǎn)標(biāo)的的一種保險(xiǎn)制度。這種制度可以將公司的董事和高級(jí)職員所承擔(dān)的責(zé)任風(fēng)險(xiǎn)部分地轉(zhuǎn)嫁給保險(xiǎn)公司,由保險(xiǎn)公司按保險(xiǎn)合同約定來(lái)承擔(dān)董事和高級(jí)職員由于職責(zé)失誤而導(dǎo)致的經(jīng)濟(jì)賠償責(zé)任。 在歐美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,絕大多數(shù)的上市公司都為自己的董事及高級(jí)職員購(gòu)買(mǎi)了董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)。董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度能夠迅速發(fā)展,說(shuō)明其存在具有必要性。美國(guó)的公司法理論認(rèn)為,董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度保護(hù)無(wú)辜的董事和高級(jí)職員免受那些不正當(dāng)?shù)闹肛?zé),鼓勵(lì)了有能力的人士接受董事和高級(jí)職員職位,并阻止了惡意股東的無(wú)聊訴訟。 在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的趨勢(shì)下,我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)已經(jīng)融入世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的大潮之中。隨著我國(guó)政府改善公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)力度的增大,上市公司董事因違法違規(guī)而受到中國(guó)證監(jiān)會(huì)懲處的情況逐年增多。越來(lái)越多的董事逐漸意識(shí)到自己的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有多大,紛紛尋求規(guī)避方式。并且隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,越來(lái)越多的公司到海外去尋求更大的發(fā)展,為了使這些公司能在全球化的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中得到一席之地,也必須要建立完善的董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn),消除董事和高級(jí)職員的后顧之憂,讓他們放心大膽地發(fā)揮自己的潛能。 自2002年1月23日中國(guó)平安保險(xiǎn)公司向萬(wàn)科企業(yè)股份有限公司簽發(fā)第一份董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)單以來(lái),八年已經(jīng)過(guò)去,董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度雖略有發(fā)展,但現(xiàn)狀慘淡。在制度方面,現(xiàn)階段關(guān)于董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的法律制度不健全,即使在存在的極少數(shù)關(guān)于董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度的規(guī)定中,內(nèi)容不夠具體,而且立法層次比較低,沒(méi)有基本法律層面的基礎(chǔ)性規(guī)定。在實(shí)踐方面,隨著社會(huì)討論的深入,雖然公司管理層對(duì)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)認(rèn)識(shí)的加深,國(guó)家有關(guān)強(qiáng)化董事及高級(jí)職員法律責(zé)任的法律頒布,陸續(xù)有公司購(gòu)買(mǎi)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn),但董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展仍然很緩慢。這與我國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的理論與實(shí)踐上的不足不無(wú)關(guān)系,值得我們探究。 在建立我國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度的過(guò)程中,我們應(yīng)盡可能地立足于我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的立法,完善董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度的相關(guān)立法,并結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際,借鑒、吸收、移植國(guó)外的立法成就和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),從而建立符合中國(guó)國(guó)情的董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)機(jī)制,這不僅對(duì)于目前我國(guó)公司經(jīng)濟(jì)和保險(xiǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,而且對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展和法律制度的完善,都有著極為重要的意義。
[Abstract]:Directors' liability insurance, which is called "directors' and officers' liability insurance directors Officers Liability Insurance)", is an insurance system in which directors and managers assume civil liability to the company or to third parties (shareholders, creditors, etc.). This kind of system can transfer the liability risk of directors and officers to the insurance company in part, and the insurance company will bear the financial compensation liability caused by the director and the officer because of the mistake of duty according to the agreement of insurance contract. In European and American developed countries, the vast majority of listed companies have taken out director liability insurance for their directors and officers. The director's liability insurance system can develop rapidly, which shows the necessity of its existence. According to the theory of corporate law in the United States, the system of directors liability insurance protects innocent directors and officers from improper accusations, encourages those who have the ability to accept the positions of directors and officers, and prevents boring lawsuits by malicious shareholders. In the trend of economic globalization, China's economy has been integrated into the tide of the world economy. With the increase of our government's efforts to improve the corporate governance structure, the number of directors of listed companies punished by CSRC has increased year by year for violating the laws and regulations. More and more directors are becoming aware of how risky they are and looking for ways to avoid it. And with the development of the economy, more and more companies go overseas to seek greater development. In order for these companies to gain a place in the global competition, they must also establish perfect directors' liability insurance. Remove the worries of directors and officers and give them the confidence to develop their potential boldly. Eight years have passed since China Ping an Insurance Company issued the first director liability insurance policy to Vanke Enterprise Co., Ltd. on January 23, 2002. Although the director liability insurance system has developed slightly, the present situation is bleak. In terms of system, the current legal system on directors' liability insurance is not perfect. Even in the very few provisions on directors' liability insurance system, the content is not specific enough, and the legislative level is relatively low. There are no basic legal provisions. In practice, with the deepening of social discussions, although the management of the company has a deeper understanding of directors' liability insurance, a national law on strengthening the legal liability of directors and officers has been promulgated, and companies have successively purchased directors' liability insurance. But the director liability insurance market is still slow. It has something to do with the deficiency of the theory and practice of director's liability insurance in our country. In the process of establishing the director's liability insurance system in our country, we should try our best to base ourselves on the existing legislation, perfect the relevant legislation of director's liability insurance system, and combine with the reality of our country, draw lessons from and absorb, Transplanting foreign legislative achievements and practical experience to establish a director's liability insurance mechanism in line with China's national conditions, this is not only for the development of our company economy and insurance industry, but also for the economy. The long-term development of the society and the perfection of the legal system are of great significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.284

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施衛(wèi)忠;董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)若干法律問(wèn)題研究[J];南京審計(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 劉凡;董事利益保護(hù)芻議[J];西安財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 徐進(jìn);我國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的現(xiàn)狀分析[J];廣西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

4 張軍奎,張貞智;論董事利益保護(hù)機(jī)制——英美公司法中董事利益保護(hù)機(jī)制及其對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒[J];決策借鑒;2001年06期

5 黃華均,劉玉屏;董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)——制度變遷的法律分析[J];河北法學(xué);2004年04期

6 孟偉;董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的保險(xiǎn)標(biāo)的與保險(xiǎn)利益之探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年04期

7 程雪原,尤匡領(lǐng);董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)之法理分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年19期

8 蔡元慶;;股東代表訴訟中董事訴訟費(fèi)用補(bǔ)償研究[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

9 劉志云;試論美國(guó)董事利益保護(hù)機(jī)制[J];證券市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)報(bào);2001年11期

10 蔡元慶;董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度和民商法的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];法學(xué);2003年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李心愉;張?jiān)疥?;中國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)發(fā)展——理論分析與現(xiàn)實(shí)探討[A];十二五·新挑戰(zhàn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)綜合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理——北大賽瑟（CCISSR）論壇文集·2011[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 黃，

本文編號(hào)：1896202