本文選題：股東派生訴訟 + 股東直接訴訟　； 參考：《云南財經(jīng)大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：2006年我國頒布新《公司法》時,在借鑒英國、美國、日本等國關(guān)于股東派生訴訟規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,正式引入了股東派生訴訟制度,這無疑是完善公司的內(nèi)部治理,更好維護和保障公司中小股東利益的一項新的創(chuàng)舉。這一制度從頒布至今,一直是《公司法》理論界與實務(wù)界討論的熱點問題。由于股東派生訴訟制度對保護公司的合法權(quán)益,完善公司的內(nèi)部治理方面發(fā)揮著重要的作用,所以它在股東訴訟制度體系中占有重要的不可替代的位置。本文將首先對股東派生訴訟制度的歷史淵源及其發(fā)展軌跡進行梳理,旨在對派生訴訟的基本狀況進行了解,從其產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的過程中了解這一制度產(chǎn)生的歷史必然性,了解這一制度的基本內(nèi)涵,這樣可以更好的理解這一制度的價值所在。其次,本文將對英美法系和大陸法系的股東派生訴訟制度進行研究,通過研究來了解和學習其他國家有關(guān)這一制度的先進立法與經(jīng)驗。最后,在將我國股東派生訴訟制度與其他國家的制度進行比較分析后,指出我國股東派生訴訟制度中存在很多不完善的地方,如:公司在派生訴訟中的法律地位在我國立法上存在空白、股東派生訴訟案件的訴訟管轄問題規(guī)定不明確、訴訟費用如何承擔沒有規(guī)定等等。針對這些問題本文都將在借鑒其他國家先進立法的基礎(chǔ)上,再結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實的法律體系特點與我國國情提出完善我們國家股東派生訴訟制度的個人意見。
[Abstract]:When China promulgated the new Company Law in 2006, on the basis of drawing lessons from the provisions of shareholder derivative litigation in Britain, the United States, Japan and other countries, the shareholder derivative litigation system was formally introduced, which is undoubtedly to perfect the internal governance of the company. Better safeguard and protect the interests of minority shareholders of the company a new initiative. Since its promulgation, this system has been a hot issue in the theoretical and practical circles of Company Law. Because the shareholder derivative litigation system plays an important role in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the company and perfecting the internal governance of the company, it occupies an important and irreplaceable position in the shareholder litigation system. In this paper, the historical origin and development track of the derivative litigation system of shareholders are firstly analyzed, in order to understand the basic status of derivative litigation, and to understand the historical inevitability of the system in the process of its emergence and development. Understand the basic connotation of this system, so as to better understand the value of the system. Secondly, this paper will study the shareholder derivative litigation system of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and learn from the advanced legislation and experience of other countries. Finally, after comparing and analyzing the system of shareholder derivative litigation in our country and other countries, the author points out that there are many imperfections in the system of shareholder derivative action in our country. For example: the legal status of the company in derivative litigation is blank in our country, the jurisdiction of shareholder derivative litigation is not clear, how to bear the costs of litigation is not stipulated, and so on. On the basis of drawing lessons from the advanced legislation of other countries and combining the characteristics of the legal system of our country and the national conditions of our country, this paper will put forward personal opinions to perfect the derivative litigation system of our country's shareholders.
【學位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡立東;;論股東派生訴訟中被告的范圍[J];當代法學;2007年01期

2 胡曉靜;;德國股東派生訴訟制度評析[J];當代法學;2007年02期

3 李玫;;論股東派生訴訟在我國公司法中的引入與適用[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學學報);2008年05期

4 朱圓;;美國的股東派生訴訟制度[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學版);2008年11期

5 榮振華;;淺論我國股東派生訴訟制度之缺陷[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2008年07期

6 王明河;;從解釋論及立法論視角論股東派生訴訟之原告[J];法制與社會;2008年36期

7 袁珂;;新《公司法》與股東派生訴訟制度的完善[J];法制與社會;2008年36期

8 段志平;;論我國股東派生訴訟制度的完善[J];全國商情(經(jīng)濟理論研究);2008年22期

9 雍容;黃明舉;;淺論股東派生訴訟制度[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2006年06期

10 張舫;肖仕剛;;股東派生訴訟制度在司法實踐中的法律探討[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年13期

，

本文編號：1839672