本文選題：公司名稱(chēng) + 公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)�。� 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：任何一個(gè)公司都應(yīng)該有自己的名稱(chēng),就像每一個(gè)自然人都有自己的姓名一樣。公司名稱(chēng)是公司人格獨(dú)立和特定化的具體體現(xiàn),是公司設(shè)立登記、從事生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng),并享有權(quán)利承擔(dān)義務(wù)的基本條件。由于公司名稱(chēng)對(duì)于公司而言具有重要的法律意義,公司名稱(chēng)也上升為公司所擁有的一項(xiàng)重要權(quán)利——公司名稱(chēng)權(quán),并受到法律的保護(hù)。正是基于以上原因,商品經(jīng)濟(jì)起萌較早以及市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)比較發(fā)達(dá)的國(guó)家很早就開(kāi)始重視對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的保護(hù)與規(guī)范,關(guān)于公司名稱(chēng)的保護(hù)也比較完備。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的涉及公司名稱(chēng)的法律法規(guī)主要有《民法通則》、《公司法》、《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》、《公司登記管理?xiàng)l例》、《企業(yè)法人登記管理?xiàng)l例》、《企業(yè)名稱(chēng)登記管理規(guī)定》、《企業(yè)名稱(chēng)登記管理實(shí)施辦法》。表面上看來(lái),我國(guó)對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的保護(hù)與規(guī)范已經(jīng)形成一個(gè)初步的法律框架,但是仔細(xì)研究就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),在這些法律法規(guī)及規(guī)章的規(guī)定中,對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的保護(hù)大多都只是原則性和程序性的規(guī)定,根本無(wú)法達(dá)到保護(hù)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的目的。 此外,當(dāng)前我國(guó)法學(xué)界也沒(méi)有專(zhuān)門(mén)研究公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的法律保護(hù)問(wèn)題。由于傳統(tǒng)的計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)體制觀念,大多都只研究了企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)的法律保護(hù)問(wèn)題,因?yàn)楣咀鳛槠髽I(yè)形態(tài)的一種,當(dāng)然可以適用企業(yè)名稱(chēng)保護(hù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定。但是,就企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)法律保護(hù)問(wèn)題的研究也未有一本專(zhuān)著,其它的相關(guān)研究也僅有幾篇刊登在法學(xué)期刊上的學(xué)術(shù)論文而已。對(duì)于與公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)密切聯(lián)系的商號(hào)權(quán),學(xué)者們雖然也做了一些探討,但是由于我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)企業(yè)名稱(chēng)和商號(hào)區(qū)分的模糊性,對(duì)商號(hào)權(quán)保護(hù)的研究也與企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)的保護(hù)基本雷同。但是不管是對(duì)企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)還是商號(hào)權(quán)的研究,學(xué)者們對(duì)此問(wèn)題的研究都集中在大的立法和制度框架中,沒(méi)有深入到具體的權(quán)利內(nèi)容層面上去研究,所以提出的完善建議也缺乏可操作性,這不得不說(shuō)是一個(gè)缺陷。本文在研究此問(wèn)題時(shí),認(rèn)為大概的思路應(yīng)該是：要研究公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的保護(hù),首先應(yīng)該分析其權(quán)利的內(nèi)容,然后從其作為一項(xiàng)權(quán)利在權(quán)利內(nèi)容各個(gè)方面存在的保護(hù)不足進(jìn)行探討并提出建議,真正達(dá)到全面保護(hù)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的目的。 本文分為五個(gè)部分,總計(jì)3萬(wàn)4千余字。第一部分對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)及公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)做了詳細(xì)的概述。首先介紹了我國(guó)立法中及學(xué)者們對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)的不同稱(chēng)謂,在分析這些稱(chēng)謂的混雜使用后,提出應(yīng)在公司相關(guān)法律領(lǐng)域內(nèi)統(tǒng)一使用公司名稱(chēng)這個(gè)稱(chēng)謂,進(jìn)而為全面保護(hù)公司名稱(chēng)提供一個(gè)明確的基本概念。在此基礎(chǔ)上,綜合公司名稱(chēng)的本質(zhì),將公司名稱(chēng)定義為：公司名稱(chēng)是公司依法取得的名稱(chēng),是公司在從事經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng)時(shí),區(qū)別與其他企業(yè)的標(biāo)志性名稱(chēng),是公司在從事經(jīng)營(yíng)行為時(shí)所使用的唯一的特定稱(chēng)呼。在界定完公司名稱(chēng)的涵義后,探討了公司名稱(chēng)的四個(gè)特征。即：依法性、營(yíng)業(yè)性、標(biāo)志性、單一性。其次對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的涵義、特征及其權(quán)利內(nèi)容做了界定。本文基于前述探討將公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)界定為：公司依法對(duì)自己的名稱(chēng)享有設(shè)定、取得、使用、變更、轉(zhuǎn)讓并排除他人損害的權(quán)利,然后探討了公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的三個(gè)特征。為全面保護(hù)名稱(chēng)權(quán),將其權(quán)利內(nèi)容界定為五個(gè)部分,即設(shè)定權(quán)、取得權(quán)、使用權(quán)、變更權(quán)、轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)。 第二部分從公司名稱(chēng)設(shè)定權(quán)這一基礎(chǔ)的權(quán)利內(nèi)容著手,開(kāi)始詳細(xì)探討公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)保護(hù)所存在的不足并提出完善建議。首先,對(duì)于公司名稱(chēng)設(shè)定權(quán),建議立法取消在公司名稱(chēng)中必須冠以行政區(qū)劃和行業(yè)的限制性規(guī)定,并建議我國(guó)應(yīng)采取字號(hào)+組織形式的名稱(chēng)構(gòu)成模式。其次,對(duì)于公司名稱(chēng)取得權(quán),建議將我國(guó)單一的依注冊(cè)登記取得公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的方式改革為以注冊(cè)登記取得為主,以在先使用取得為輔的公司名稱(chēng)取得方式；并將禁止混淆原則作為排除公司取得名稱(chēng)權(quán)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第三,對(duì)于公司名稱(chēng)使用權(quán),本文共提出四點(diǎn)建議,即：1.加強(qiáng)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)使用權(quán)的保護(hù)；2.將公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)明確為在先權(quán)利加以保護(hù)；3.立法應(yīng)明確規(guī)定公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的許可使用；4.賦予公司登記機(jī)關(guān)更改侵權(quán)方公司名稱(chēng)的權(quán)力。第四,對(duì)于公司名稱(chēng)變更權(quán),建議在立法中明確公司名稱(chēng)變更權(quán)行使的限定條件,將“特殊原因”的具體情形作出例舉；并建議應(yīng)嚴(yán)格規(guī)范上市公司名稱(chēng)變更中的準(zhǔn)侵權(quán)行為。最后,對(duì)于公司名稱(chēng)轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán),建議我國(guó)立法允許公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)單獨(dú)轉(zhuǎn)讓?zhuān)徊⒃诹⒎ㄖ忻鞔_規(guī)定公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的具體程序和效力。 至此,本文主要是通過(guò)分析我國(guó)立法對(duì)公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)的各個(gè)權(quán)利內(nèi)容保護(hù)的不足進(jìn)而提出初淺的建議,期望本文的研究能對(duì)我國(guó)立法就改革公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)保護(hù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定做出一點(diǎn)貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Any company should have its own name, just as every natural person has its own name. The name of the company is the specific embodiment of the independence and specialization of the company. It is the basic item for the company to set up a registration, engage in the production and operation activities and enjoy the obligations of the company. In the legal sense, the company name also rises as an important right which the company owns - the company name right, and is protected by the law. It is based on the above reasons that the early commodity economy and the more developed market economy have begun to attach importance to the protection and regulation of the company name rights and the protection of the name of the company. The current laws and regulations concerning the name of the company mainly include the general rules of the civil law, the company law, the law of anti unfair competition, the regulations on the management of corporate registration, the regulations on the management of corporate registration, the regulations on the registration and management of enterprise names, and the measures for the registration and management of enterprise names. Protection and norms have formed a preliminary legal framework, but careful study will find that in the provisions of these laws and regulations and regulations, the protection of the right of the name of the company is mostly only principles and procedural provisions, which can not achieve the purpose of protecting the right of the name of the company at all.
In addition, the legal protection problem of the right of company name is not studied in the legal circle of our country at present. Because of the traditional idea of planned economy system, the legal protection of the name right of enterprise is mostly studied, because the company, as one kind of enterprise form, can be applied to the relevant regulations of the enterprise name protection, but the name of the enterprise is the name of the enterprise. There is not a monograph in the study of the legal protection of rights, and the other related studies have only a few academic papers published in the legal journal. The scholars have also made some discussions on the right of business name which is closely related to the name of the company. But because of the fuzziness of the distinction between the name of the enterprise and the business name of the Chinese scholars, the right to trade names is right. The research of protection is basically the same as the protection of the right of enterprise name. However, whether it is the research on the name right or the right of business name of the enterprise, the scholars' research on this issue is concentrated in the large legislative and institutional framework, and does not go deep into the specific level of the right content, and the proposed perfect suggestions are also lack of operability. In the study of this problem, this paper thinks that the general idea should be: To study the protection of the right of the name of the company, the content of its rights should be analyzed first, and then the protection of the right content in all aspects of the right is discussed and suggestions are put forward to truly achieve the comprehensive protection of the name of the company. The purpose of the right.
This article is divided into five parts, with a total of 30 thousand and 4 thousand words. The first part gives a detailed overview of the name of the company and the name of the company. First, it introduces the different appellations of the name of the company in our country's legislation and the scholars, and after the analysis of the mixed use of these appellations, it is proposed that the name of the company should be used in the legal field of the company. Then it provides a clear basic concept for the comprehensive protection of the company name. On this basis, the company name is defined as: the name of the company is the name obtained by the company according to law. It is the trademark name of the company when it is engaged in business activities, and the company is engaged in the operation of the company. After defining the meaning of the name of the company, after defining the meaning of the company name, it explores the four characteristics of the company's name, namely: Law, business, iconic, singleness. Secondly, the definition of the meaning, characteristics and rights of the company's name is defined. Based on the foregoing discussion, the company's right of name is defined as the company according to law to itself according to law. The name is entitled to set, obtain, use, change, transfer and exclude the rights of others' damage, and then discusses the three characteristics of the right of the name of the company. In order to fully protect the right of name, the right content is defined as five parts, namely, the right to set, the right to obtain, the right to use, the right to change, and the right to transfer.
The second part begins with the right content of the company name setting right, and begins to discuss the shortcomings of the company's name right protection in detail and puts forward some suggestions. First, for the right to set the name of the company, it is suggested that the legislation should be abolished in the name of the company by the restrictive regulations of administrative division and industry, and it is suggested that China should adopt the word. Secondly, for the right to obtain the name of the company, it is suggested that the way of obtaining the right of name of the company in our country is the main way to obtain the name of the company in accordance with the registration and registration, and the way of obtaining the name of the company is obtained by the first use of the company's name, and the principle of prohibiting the confusion is taken as the standard to eliminate the name of the company. Third, for the right to use the name of the company, this article puts forward four suggestions, namely: 1. strengthen the protection of "Anti Unfair Competition Law" to the right to use the name of the company; 2. make the right of company name clear as the first right to protect; 3. legislation should clearly specify the license of the right of company name; 4. give the company registration authority to change the tort company The power of the name. Fourth, for the right to change the name of the company, it is suggested that the limited conditions for the exercise of the right to change the name of the company should be defined in the legislation, and the specific circumstances of the "special cause" should be exemplified; and it is suggested that the quasi tort should be strictly regulated in the name change of the listed company. Finally, the right to transfer the name of the company is suggested to allow the legislation of our country to be allowed. The company's right to name is transferred separately, and the specific procedures and effectiveness of the transfer of the company's name right are clearly stipulated in the legislation.
At this point, this article is mainly through the analysis of the insufficient protection of the rights and contents of the right of company name by the legislation of our country, and then put forward the initial shallow suggestions. It is expected that the study of this article can make a little contribution to the relevant provisions of the legislation of our country to reform the protection of the right of the company name.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳書(shū)高,劉巾?yè)];公司名稱(chēng)權(quán)法律問(wèn)題研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年05期

2 盛杰民;對(duì)企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)的法律思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1997年06期

3 王宇月;;試論我國(guó)企業(yè)的商號(hào)權(quán)[J];法學(xué)天地;2001年02期

4 王占明;企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)的法律再定位——兼論企業(yè)名稱(chēng)權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的沖突解決[J];法學(xué);2003年02期

5 丁濱元;企業(yè)名稱(chēng)登記管理的探討[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;1997年05期

6 劉文召;完善企業(yè)名稱(chēng)法律制度 促進(jìn)私營(yíng)企業(yè)發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2000年04期

7 丁濱元;名稱(chēng)專(zhuān)用權(quán)還是名稱(chēng)權(quán)?——談走出名稱(chēng)保護(hù)的誤區(qū)[J];工商行政管理;1995年05期

8 劉春田;應(yīng)建立符合市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的商號(hào)保護(hù)制[J];工商行政管理;2000年07期

9 袁建軍;對(duì)企業(yè)名稱(chēng)惡意混淆的思考[J];工商行政管理;2000年09期

10 梁學(xué)高;現(xiàn)行企業(yè)名稱(chēng)登記管理弊端[J];工商行政管理;2000年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 姜亞蘭 江南;[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：1795252