本文選題：股東派生訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：公司　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國新《公司法》規(guī)定了股東派生訴訟制度,它在預(yù)防董事、經(jīng)理等公司高級管理人員侵犯公司利益,促進(jìn)公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)完善,保護(hù)股東的利益,起著重大的作用。但是,公司法沒有規(guī)定公司在股東派生中的法律地位,這不利于對公司利益的保護(hù)。因此,筆者對這一問題進(jìn)行研究,并提出個(gè)人意見。 本文分為以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分主要介紹股東派生訴訟中公司的法律地位的認(rèn)定存在一些現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。這些問題包括：法律規(guī)定的缺失,司法實(shí)踐的不統(tǒng)一,理論界的巨大的爭議。這些問題的根源就是法律對公司法律地位規(guī)定的缺失。第二部分主要介紹理論界關(guān)于公司法律地位的各種學(xué)說。這些學(xué)說本身都或多或少地存在某些問題,無法有效地解決公司的法律地位問題。第三部分主要介紹英美法系的英國和美國以及大陸法系的日本關(guān)于公司法律地位的不同的立法例。第四部分主要分析公司的訴訟參加問題,它是解決公司法律地位問題的前提。第五部分主要是對公司的法律地位作出定性,認(rèn)定公司應(yīng)當(dāng)是股東派生訴訟的輔助第三人,并分析了公司參加股東派生訴訟的方式和在訴訟中的權(quán)利義務(wù)。 最后部分,本文認(rèn)為公司在股東派生中應(yīng)當(dāng)居于輔助第三人的法律地位,但是由于我國民事訴訟對輔助第三人沒有作出固定,筆者建議在進(jìn)行民事訴訟法修改時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)對我國的第三人制度進(jìn)行修改,增加輔助第三人的法律規(guī)定。而在當(dāng)下的司法實(shí)踐中,將公司作為無獨(dú)立請求權(quán)的第三人,或許是最好的選擇。 總之,明確公司在股東派生訴訟中的法律地位,對完善公司治理結(jié)構(gòu),保護(hù)中小股東利益和公司利益有著重要的意義。
[Abstract]:China's new "Company Law > provisions of shareholder derivative litigation system, which in the prevention of directors, managers and other senior management personnel infringe upon the interests of the company, improve the corporate governance structure, to protect the interests of shareholders, plays a significant role. However, the company law does not stipulate the legal status of the company in the shareholder derivative, which is not conducive to to protect the interests of the company. Therefore, the author studied the problems, and put forward personal views.
This article is divided into the following parts:
The legal status of that company, the first part mainly introduces the shareholder derivative action in the presence of some practical problems. These problems include: lack of legal provisions, judicial practice is not uniform, the theory circles great controversy. The root of these problems is the lack of legal provisions on the legal status of the company. The second part mainly introduces the various theories about the legal status of the company. These theories themselves are more or less there are some problems, can not effectively solve the problem of the legal status of the company. The third part mainly introduces the common law of England and the United States and Japan on the legal status of the company's own legislation. Part of the main analysis of the fourth companies in the proceedings, it is a prerequisite to solve the legal status of the company. The fifth part mainly defines the legal status of the company, the company shall be identified The shareholder derivative suit is the auxiliary third party, and analyzes the company's way to participate in the shareholder derivative action and the right and duty in the lawsuit.
In the last part, this paper argues that the company should be in the legal status of auxiliary third people in shareholder derivative, but because of China's civil litigation for third people do not have to make a fixed, the author recommends the amendment of civil procedural law, it should be third system for our country to revise the law, increase the auxiliary third people. In the current judicial practice, the company as the third party without independent claims, may be the best choice.
In a word, it is of great significance to clarify the legal status of the company in the shareholder derivative action, to improve the corporate governance structure, to protect the interests of small and medium shareholders and to the interests of the company.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃文藝;論當(dāng)代西方比較法學(xué)的發(fā)展[J];比較法研究;2002年01期

2 王思洋;;日本股東代表訴訟制度淺析[J];才智;2008年01期

3 王成;薛紅燕;;公司法人人格否認(rèn)制度適用研究[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 徐純先;國外股東代表訴訟當(dāng)事人制度研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

5 段厚省;股東代表訴訟中公司和其他股東的地位[J];法學(xué)雜志;1998年05期

6 王菲;;關(guān)于新《公司法》股東代表訴訟的幾點(diǎn)理論思考——淺析新《公司法》第152條[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年01期

7 傅冰;;股東派生訴訟中公司的法律地位新論[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年04期

8 王紅艷;;論我國股東派生訴訟中股東和公司的地位[J];貴州工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

9 吳一平;;股東派生訴訟之比較[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

10 孫玉鳳;論股東代表訴訟中公司的法律地位[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1689507