本文選題：股東知情權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利內(nèi)容　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東知情權(quán)是公司股東所享有的非常重要的股東權(quán)之一,也是其他股東權(quán)得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的根基。經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)與股東權(quán)相分離是當(dāng)代公司管理制度的一項(xiàng)基本原則,大部分股東對(duì)公司的運(yùn)營(yíng)活動(dòng)并沒有直接參與,公司的大權(quán)牢牢掌握在董事會(huì)和經(jīng)理手中,這就會(huì)對(duì)股東利益的實(shí)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)生威脅,所以為確保股東知情權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)很多國(guó)家都確立了股東知情權(quán)制度。 由于我國(guó)公司內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)的混亂和相關(guān)法律制度的不健全,使得我國(guó)股東知情權(quán)保護(hù)得不到應(yīng)有的重視,股東知情權(quán)案件屢見報(bào)端。雖然我國(guó)2005年修訂了《公司法》,其中對(duì)股東知情權(quán)的保護(hù)的規(guī)定己趨于完善,但仍有些許不足,本文系統(tǒng)考察了股東知情權(quán)制度在我國(guó)的發(fā)展面貌,對(duì)司法實(shí)務(wù)中出現(xiàn)的股東知情權(quán)案件進(jìn)行調(diào)查分析,通過我國(guó)司法實(shí)務(wù)中的具體案例,對(duì)相關(guān)的司法實(shí)務(wù)疑難問題進(jìn)行分析探討,并對(duì)建立股東知情權(quán)綜合保障體系提出自己意見,以期為解決類似案件提供有益幫助以及為完善立法提供富有價(jià)值的參考依據(jù)。 筆者用三部分對(duì)文章進(jìn)行了闡述: 第一部分:首先對(duì)股東知情權(quán)的概念進(jìn)行闡釋,對(duì)我國(guó)股東權(quán)制度的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析,其次對(duì)新《公司法》與舊《公司法》之間關(guān)于股東知情權(quán)的規(guī)定進(jìn)行比較分析。然后筆者結(jié)合所調(diào)查股東知情權(quán)案件的情況,從涉訟主體、訴訟標(biāo)的、訴訟結(jié)果等方面總結(jié)概括股東知情權(quán)案件的基本特點(diǎn)。對(duì)糾紛產(chǎn)生原因背景進(jìn)行了論述,并就審判實(shí)務(wù)審理股東知情權(quán)案件案件的價(jià)值取向進(jìn)行了了闡釋。 第二部分:對(duì)我國(guó)股東知情權(quán)制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和內(nèi)容進(jìn)行分析,并著重對(duì)知情權(quán)權(quán)利主體、義務(wù)主體、行使范圍、正當(dāng)性目的判斷以及舉證責(zé)任分配等內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了分析,對(duì)于審判中的疑難問題提出了自己的觀點(diǎn)。 第三部分:筆者在前兩章從司法角度論述的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為司法功能畢竟是有限的,保護(hù)股東知情權(quán)不僅要靠司法的保障。還需要多方面的努力,并結(jié)合對(duì)股東知情權(quán)案件原因的分析,對(duì)癥下藥,提出自己對(duì)建立股東知情權(quán)綜合保障體系的建議。
[Abstract]:The shareholder's right to know is one of the most important shareholder's rights enjoyed by the shareholders of a company, and it is also the foundation on which other shareholders' rights can be realized. The separation of the management right from the shareholder's right is a basic principle of the contemporary company management system. The majority of shareholders are not directly involved in the operation of the company, and the power of the company is firmly in the hands of the board of directors and the manager, which will threaten the realization of the interests of the shareholders. Therefore, to ensure the realization of shareholders' right to know, many countries have established the system of shareholders' right to know. Due to the confusion of the internal corporate governance structure and the unsoundness of the relevant legal system, the protection of the shareholders' right to know in our country is not given due attention. Although China revised the Company Law in 2005, the provisions on the protection of shareholders' right to know have tended to be perfected, but there are still some deficiencies. This paper systematically examines the development of the system of shareholders' right to know in our country. Through the investigation and analysis of the cases of shareholders' right to know in the judicial practice, and through the specific cases in the judicial practice of our country, this paper analyzes and discusses the difficult problems in the relevant judicial practice. The author also puts forward his own opinions on the establishment of the comprehensive guarantee system of shareholders' right to know in order to provide useful help for solving similar cases and provide valuable reference basis for perfecting legislation. The author expounds the article in three parts:. The first part: firstly, it explains the concept of shareholder's right to know, and analyzes the present situation of our country's shareholder's right system. Secondly, the author makes a comparative analysis of the provisions on the shareholders' right to know between the new Company Law and the old Company Law. Then the author combines the investigation of the cases of shareholders' right to know, from the litigant subject, the object of the lawsuit, This paper summarizes the basic characteristics of shareholders' right to know cases from the aspects of litigation results, discusses the background of the causes of disputes, and explains the value orientation of the cases of shareholders' right to know in trial practice. The second part analyzes the theoretical basis and content of the shareholder's right to know system in China, and focuses on the analysis of the subject of the right to know, the subject of obligation, the scope of exercise, the judgment of legitimate purpose and the distribution of burden of proof. He put forward his own views on the difficult problems in the trial. The third part: on the basis of the first two chapters from the judicial angle, the author thinks that the judicial function is limited after all, and the protection of shareholders' right to know depends not only on judicial protection, but also on many aspects of efforts. Based on the analysis of the reasons of shareholder's right to know, the author puts forward his own suggestion on establishing the comprehensive safeguard system of shareholder's right to know.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢玉林;論股東的質(zhì)詢權(quán)[J];比較法研究;2005年01期

2 周建偉;;美國(guó)公司法股東查閱權(quán)制度演變初探[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

3 宋良剛;股東知情權(quán)的法律保護(hù)——北京××公司股東知情權(quán)糾紛案[J];法律適用;2005年05期

4 楊路;;股東知情權(quán)案件若干問題研究[J];法律適用;2007年04期

5 龐梅;;股東知情權(quán)：從利益平衡到法律適用[J];法律適用;2007年08期

6 蔣大興;超越股東知情權(quán)訴訟的司法困境[J];法學(xué);2005年02期

7 馮曉萍;;公司集團(tuán)訴訟制度價(jià)值研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年04期

8 周洪亮;;比較法視角下股東代表訴訟前置程序的思考[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

9 藍(lán)壽榮,王新;試析美國(guó)上市公司的股東賬簿查閱權(quán)[J];理論月刊;2004年10期

10 王飛;;論股東賬簿查閱權(quán)的司法保護(hù)[J];人民司法;2006年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 宋會(huì)譜;[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1679093