本文選題：債權(quán)出資　切入點(diǎn)：債權(quán)讓與　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,債權(quán)已成為一種獨(dú)立的財(cái)產(chǎn)形態(tài),并在社會(huì)中以不同的方式發(fā)揮著經(jīng)濟(jì)效用。而這種財(cái)產(chǎn)形式能否直接進(jìn)入到公司進(jìn)而資本化則有著謹(jǐn)慎的考慮。新《公司法》以廣泛吸收社會(huì)資金、促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的立法目標(biāo)修改了出資方式的合法要件,這給債權(quán)出資提供了原則性的適格資格,但顯然不能就此認(rèn)為債權(quán)出資的法律制度業(yè)已建立。債權(quán)出資的特征要求法律必須針對(duì)債權(quán)出資本身建立起一套完善、可行、詳實(shí)的法律制度,以保證債權(quán)效用的發(fā)揮和其他相關(guān)者利益的保護(hù)。本文從債權(quán)出資的一般原理入手,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外立法例的考察和對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)行規(guī)范的分析,對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)出資法律制度的構(gòu)建提出自己的建議,以便最大限度消除債權(quán)出資的負(fù)面影響,使債權(quán)出資得以有序、良好的發(fā)揮其正面作用。本文共分三章: 第一章:債權(quán)出資的一般原理。首先對(duì)債權(quán)出資的概念、特征進(jìn)行了說(shuō)明;其次對(duì)于債權(quán)出資進(jìn)行了分類,并提出以對(duì)第三人的債權(quán)出資與以對(duì)公司的債權(quán)出資的法律基礎(chǔ)同為債權(quán)讓與;最后對(duì)債權(quán)出資標(biāo)的物進(jìn)行了分析,即債權(quán)是一種財(cái)產(chǎn)形態(tài)的說(shuō)明和這種財(cái)產(chǎn)形態(tài)作為出資方式的適格性說(shuō)明。 第二章:債權(quán)出資的國(guó)內(nèi)外立法例的考察。國(guó)外立法例考察的結(jié)果為無(wú)論大陸法系的德國(guó)、日本和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū),還是英美法系的美國(guó)、英國(guó)都對(duì)債權(quán)出資持肯定的態(tài)度,并對(duì)于債權(quán)出資的缺陷有專門的法律制度予以彌補(bǔ);國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)于債權(quán)出資的規(guī)定較為簡(jiǎn)略,并存在一些不足。 第三章:我國(guó)債權(quán)出資法律制度的構(gòu)建,為本文的重點(diǎn)。第一部分,分析了債權(quán)出資中涉及的兩個(gè)基本的制度,即債權(quán)讓與制度、公司資本制度與債權(quán)出資之間的關(guān)系。第二部分提出我國(guó)債權(quán)出資法律制度的構(gòu)建的具體方法,其中含有兩個(gè)具體制度的構(gòu)建,第一為債權(quán)出資機(jī)制的構(gòu)建,內(nèi)容有出資標(biāo)的類型化選擇、債權(quán)出資的履行、債權(quán)出資的評(píng)估、債權(quán)出資的審查、債權(quán)出資的公示;第二,債權(quán)出資的責(zé)任機(jī)制的構(gòu)建,內(nèi)容有債權(quán)出資人的出資違約責(zé)任、資本充實(shí)責(zé)任并引入債權(quán)出資擔(dān)保機(jī)制、債權(quán)實(shí)現(xiàn)以前債權(quán)出資人股權(quán)及股權(quán)利益凍結(jié)機(jī)制、公司董事評(píng)估責(zé)任機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:With the development of market economy, creditor's rights have become an independent property form. It is prudent to consider whether this form of property can be directly entered into the company and then capitalized. The new Company Law is designed to absorb social funds extensively. The legislative objective of promoting economic development modifies the legal elements of the mode of capital contribution, which provides a principled qualification for the contribution of creditor's rights. But obviously, we cannot think that the legal system of creditor's rights contribution has been established. The characteristics of creditor's rights contribution require that the law must establish a set of perfect, feasible and detailed legal system for the capital contribution of creditor's rights. In order to ensure the utility of creditor's rights and the protection of the interests of other stakeholders, this paper begins with the general principle of creditor's rights contribution, through the investigation of foreign legislative cases and the analysis of the current domestic norms, In order to eliminate the negative influence of creditor's rights contribution, and make the creditor's rights contribution orderly and play a positive role, this paper is divided into three chapters: (1) the author puts forward his own suggestions on the construction of the legal system of creditor's rights contribution in order to eliminate the negative influence of creditor's rights contribution. Chapter one: the general principle of creditor's rights contribution. Firstly, it explains the concept and characteristics of creditor's rights contribution; secondly, it classifies creditor's rights contribution. It also puts forward that the creditor's rights contribution to the third party and the legal basis of the company's creditor's rights contribution are the same as the legal basis of the creditor's rights contribution, and finally, the subject matter of the creditor's rights contribution is analyzed. That is, the creditor's right is a description of the form of property and this form of property as a form of capital. Chapter two: the investigation of the domestic and foreign legislation cases of creditor's rights contribution. The result of the investigation of foreign legislation cases is that no matter Germany, Japan and Taiwan, or the United States of Anglo-American legal system, Britain has a positive attitude towards creditor's rights contribution. There is a special legal system to make up for the defects of creditor's rights contribution, and the stipulation of creditor's rights contribution is relatively simple in our country, and there are some shortcomings. Chapter three: the construction of the legal system of creditor's rights contribution in our country, which is the focus of this paper. The first part, analyzes the two basic systems involved in the contribution of creditor's rights, that is, the system of assignment of creditor's rights. The second part puts forward the concrete methods of constructing the legal system of creditor's rights contribution in our country, which contains two specific systems, the first is the construction of the mechanism of creditor's rights contribution, the other is the construction of the legal system of creditor's rights. The contents include the typological choice of the object of the contribution, the performance of the contribution of the creditor's rights, the evaluation of the contribution of the creditor's rights, the examination of the contribution of the creditor's rights, and the publicity of the contribution of the creditor's rights. Capital enrichment liability and the introduction of creditor's rights contribution guarantee mechanism, creditor's equity and equity interest freeze mechanism before the realization of creditor's rights, company directors' evaluation responsibility mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王寧;債權(quán)出資的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范機(jī)制[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

2 葉曉紅;債權(quán)出資法律問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

3 方毅;債權(quán)出資及其法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范研究[D];四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1678862