本文選題：董事會中心主義　切入點：經(jīng)理專政　出處：《江西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué))》2001年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國公司法在引進(jìn)國外先進(jìn)的公司制時，將我國原來落后的廠長 (經(jīng)理 )負(fù)責(zé)制摻和其中，形成了目前這種董事會和經(jīng)理分享公司行政權(quán)力的制度，這種制度在實際上使董事會形骸化，并造成行政效率低下，個人專斷及腐敗現(xiàn)象，使董事會制異化為個人專制，使公司制的優(yōu)越性無法發(fā)揮出來。因此，必須取消公司法中經(jīng)理的職權(quán)，并加強(qiáng)董事會的職能，以恢復(fù)公司制的本來面目，我們應(yīng)借鑒國外的合理做法，建立專務(wù)董事，常務(wù)董事，，董事會秘書和董事會常務(wù)會制度，用董事會集體領(lǐng)導(dǎo)代替“經(jīng)理專政”。
[Abstract]:When the company law of our country introduced the advanced company system from abroad, it incorporated the original backward factory director (manager) responsibility system into it, and formed the present system of sharing the administrative power between the board of directors and the manager. This kind of system actually makes the board of directors form, and causes the administrative inefficiency, the individual arbitrariness and the corruption phenomenon, causes the board of directors system to dissimilate into the individual autocracy, causes the company system superiority to be unable to display. We must abolish the functions and powers of managers in the Company Law and strengthen the functions of the board of directors in order to restore the true features of the corporate system. We should draw lessons from the reasonable practices of foreign countries and establish a system of special directors, managing directors, secretaries of the board of directors and executive committees of the board of directors. Replace the "executive dictatorship" with the collective leadership of the board of directors.
【作者單位】： 南昌大學(xué)法學(xué)院!
【分類號】：D922.291.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 鄭若山;論取消我國公司法中經(jīng)理職權(quán)規(guī)定的必要性[J];江西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年04期

2 劉雪斌,夏曉軍;論取消我國公司法中經(jīng)理職權(quán)規(guī)定的必要性[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年12期

本文編號：1626216