本文選題：虛假出資　切入點(diǎn)：公司　出處：《重慶大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會，公司是最主要的市場活動主體，然而在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中虛假出資現(xiàn)象很常見。股東虛假出資，其對公司，對其它足額出資股東承擔(dān)什么責(zé)任？股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后是否仍應(yīng)對公司承擔(dān)責(zé)任？股東對公司債僅人如何承擔(dān)責(zé)任？已按期足額出資股東怎樣對公司承擔(dān)責(zé)任？目前，我國對虛假出資行為的刑事責(zé)任和行政責(zé)任已有了比較系統(tǒng)的規(guī)定，但是，對其所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任卻少有規(guī)定。我國《公司法》忽視了民事責(zé)任在遏制股東虛假出資現(xiàn)象方面的獨(dú)特功能，不利于司法實(shí)踐中對公司債權(quán)人利益的維護(hù)。所以，股東虛假出資所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任還有很多值得探討之處，是本文主要研究的內(nèi)容。 本文第一部分介紹了虛假出資的概念和類型；第二部分分析了虛假出資股東對公司的民事責(zé)任，首先分析了虛假出資股東的資格認(rèn)定，得出了出資行為與股東資格并不存在一一對應(yīng)的關(guān)系的結(jié)論，然后分析虛假出資股東對公司的民事責(zé)任性質(zhì)，內(nèi)容，股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓以后對公司承擔(dān)的責(zé)任，，最后提出了虛假出資股東對公司的民事責(zé)任的立法缺陷與完善；第三部分分析了虛假出資股東對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任，包括股東虛假出資對公司債權(quán)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的立法規(guī)定，理論依據(jù)，然后分析得出虛假出資股東應(yīng)對公司債權(quán)人承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任以及承擔(dān)責(zé)任的方式和范圍，股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后對債權(quán)人承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任，最后同樣提出了虛假出資股東對債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任的立法缺陷與完善；第四部分分析了虛假出資股東對其他足額出資股東的民事責(zé)任，包括責(zé)任的性質(zhì)，承擔(dān)責(zé)任的形式，股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后僅由虛假出資股東對足額出資股東承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任，最后提出了立法缺陷與完善；第五部分對已按期足額出資股東應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任從責(zé)任性質(zhì)，主體，范圍和場合，歸則原則幾方面進(jìn)行了探討，最后對立法提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the company is the main body of market activities, but in real life, the phenomenon of false capital contribution is very common. Should the company be held responsible after the share transfer? How do shareholders assume responsibility for corporate debt only? How are shareholders responsible for the company? At present, the criminal liability and administrative responsibility for the false capital contribution have been stipulated systematically in our country, but, The company law ignores the unique function of civil liability in curbing the phenomenon of false capital contribution of shareholders, which is not conducive to the protection of the interests of the creditors of the company in judicial practice. The civil liability of shareholders'false contribution is worth discussing, which is the main content of this paper. The first part of this paper introduces the concept and types of false capital contribution, the second part analyzes the civil liability of the false capital contribution shareholder to the company, first, it analyzes the qualification of the false capital contribution shareholder. It is concluded that there is no one-to-one relationship between capital contribution behavior and shareholder qualification, and then analyzes the nature and content of the civil liability of the false capital contribution shareholder to the company, and the liability to the company after the transfer of the shares. Finally, it puts forward the legislative defects and perfection of the civil liability of the false capital contribution shareholder to the company. The third part analyzes the civil liability of the false capital contribution shareholder to the creditors of the company. Including the legislative provisions of the shareholders' false capital contribution to the creditors of the company, the theoretical basis, and then the analysis of the manner and scope of the liability of the false capital contribution shareholders to the creditors of the company, as well as the way and scope of assuming the tort liability to the creditors of the company. Finally, the legislative defects and perfection of the civil liability of the shareholders with false capital contribution to the creditors are put forward. Part 4th analyzes the civil liability of the shareholders with false capital contribution to the other shareholders with full capital contribution. Including the nature of the responsibility, the form of responsibility, after the transfer of equity only by the false capital contribution shareholders to bear the responsibility for breach of contract for the full contribution of shareholders, and finally put forward the legislative defects and perfection; In the 5th part, the author probes into the responsibility of the shareholders who have contributed in full and on time from the aspects of the nature of the responsibility, the subject, the scope and the situation, and the principle of attribution, and finally puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙綱;;論股東對公司債權(quán)人的直接責(zé)任[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年02期

2 周友蘇;;試析股東資格認(rèn)定中的若干法律問題[J];法學(xué);2006年12期

3 霍麗娜;;論我國公司法中虛假出資的民事責(zé)任[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

4 陽子龍,王歷勝;論出資瑕疵股東對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

5 曹水清;;關(guān)于股東虛假出資民事責(zé)任的探討[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2007年20期

6 胡忠惠;周曉鈺;;瑕疵出資股東對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任解讀[J];商業(yè)時代;2007年08期

7 李巧毅;論虛假出資股東對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2004年05期

8 王莉萍;債權(quán)人追究股東出資責(zé)任的法律問題[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年05期

9 姜培培;;淺論股東虛假出資民事責(zé)任的幾個問題[J];中國商界(下半月);2008年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋良剛;有限公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李敏;瑕疵出資股東對公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1570851