本文關(guān)鍵詞： 瑕疵出資 股東權(quán)利 限制　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：股東出資是股東對公司的基本義務(wù),股東應(yīng)當(dāng)足額繳納公司章程中各自認(rèn)繳的出資額。股東出資構(gòu)成的公司資本是公司取得法人資格的前提,也是公司進(jìn)行經(jīng)營活動的基本物質(zhì)條件。然而,實踐中各種形式的股東瑕疵出資層出不窮,這一方面嚴(yán)重影響公司資本的充實,損害了其他股東以及公司的整體利益,另一方面也加大了市場交易風(fēng)險,影響交易安全,間接的損害了公司債權(quán)人的利益。 如果股東出資存在瑕疵,其是否能夠享有股東資格,又是否能夠享有股東權(quán)利,如果能夠享有股東權(quán)利,那么該等權(quán)利應(yīng)否受到限制,由于我國《公司法》對這些問題缺少相對明確的規(guī)定,理論界陷入了長期的爭論。本文在對股東權(quán)利理論進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,以瑕疵出資股東的股東資格為切入點,分析了股東出資、股東資格以及股東權(quán)利三者之間的關(guān)系,明確瑕疵出資股東的股東權(quán)利應(yīng)該受到限制,并在對瑕疵出資股東股東權(quán)利限制進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)法律分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了該等限制的原則性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及路徑,進(jìn)而提出了完善我國瑕疵出資股東股東權(quán)利限制制度的建議。 本文除引言與結(jié)論以外,正文共分四章,各章基本內(nèi)容如下: 第一章對股東權(quán)利理論進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的梳理。股東權(quán)利是股東基于其股東資格對公司所享有的權(quán)利的總和,是一種特殊的社員權(quán),具體包括資產(chǎn)收益權(quán)、參與公司經(jīng)理管理權(quán)、知情權(quán)等多種權(quán)利。股東權(quán)利的權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)應(yīng)定位于股東資格的取得而非其他。 第二章探討了瑕疵出資對股東資格及股東權(quán)利的影響。股東違反其出資義務(wù)即構(gòu)成瑕疵出資。股東資格的取得與實際出資之間并不具有必然的對應(yīng)關(guān)系,瑕疵出資者可以擁有股東資格。股東資格是股東股權(quán)產(chǎn)生的基礎(chǔ),但取得股東資格并不意味著享有完整的股東權(quán)利,如果股東存在出資瑕疵,其股東權(quán)利則應(yīng)當(dāng)受到相應(yīng)的限制。 第三章對瑕疵出資股東的股東權(quán)利限制進(jìn)行了深入的法律分析。瑕疵出資股東股權(quán)限制的正當(dāng)性表現(xiàn)在公司契約理論、股東平等原則、公平正義理念、誠實信用原則以及利益衡平等多個方面。在股東瑕疵出資的情況下,其比例股權(quán)應(yīng)根據(jù)瑕疵出資的實際情況受到相應(yīng)的限制,原則上應(yīng)按照實繳出資比例行使,而非比例股權(quán)則不應(yīng)受到限制。就瑕疵出資股東股東權(quán)利限制的路徑而言,有通過法律法規(guī)或司法解釋、公司章程以及股東會決議進(jìn)行限制等幾種。 第四章提出了完善我國瑕疵出資股東股東權(quán)利限制的法律思考。我國現(xiàn)行立法和司法對瑕疵出資股東股東權(quán)利限制的規(guī)制尚有有待完善之處,應(yīng)從限制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、限制路徑等方面進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步明確界定,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對我國瑕疵出資股東除名制度進(jìn)行完善。
[Abstract]:The shareholder's capital contribution is the basic obligation of the shareholder to the company, and the shareholder shall pay in full the amount of the capital subscribed to in the articles of association of the company. The capital of the company constituted by the shareholder's contribution is the prerequisite for the company to acquire the status of a legal person, It is also the basic material condition for the company to carry out business activities. However, in practice, various forms of defective investment of shareholders emerge in endlessly. On the one hand, this seriously affects the enrichment of the company's capital and damages the interests of other shareholders and the company as a whole. On the other hand, it also increases the market transaction risk, affects the transaction security, and indirectly damages the interests of the creditors. If the shareholder's contribution is defective, whether he can enjoy the shareholder's qualification, whether he can enjoy the shareholder's rights, and if so, whether such rights should be restricted, Due to the lack of a relatively clear regulation on these issues in the Company Law of our country, the theoretical circle has been involved in a long period of controversy. On the basis of systematically combing the theory of the rights of shareholders, this paper takes the shareholder qualification of defective shareholders as the starting point. This paper analyzes the relationship among shareholders' capital contribution, shareholder qualification and shareholders' rights, and clarifies that the shareholders' rights should be restricted, and on the basis of systematic legal analysis of the limitation of shareholders' rights, This paper puts forward the principle standard and path of these restrictions, and then puts forward some suggestions to perfect the restriction system of shareholders' rights of defective capital contribution in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into four chapters, the basic content of each chapter is as follows:. The first chapter systematically combs the theory of shareholder's rights. The shareholder's right is the sum of the shareholders' rights to the company based on their shareholders' qualifications, and it is a special kind of membership right, including the right of asset gains, the right of participating in the management of the manager of the company. The right to know and other rights. The right basis of shareholders' rights should be based on the acquisition of shareholders' qualifications rather than other rights. The second chapter discusses the influence of defective capital contribution on the qualification and rights of shareholders. The shareholders who violate their obligation to contribute constitute defective capital contribution, and there is no necessary corresponding relationship between the acquisition of shareholders' qualification and the actual contribution. The shareholder qualification is the basis of the shareholder's equity, but obtaining the shareholder's qualification does not mean that the shareholder's rights are complete, if the shareholder's contribution is defective, Its shareholder rights should be subject to corresponding restrictions. The third chapter makes a deep legal analysis on the limitation of shareholders' rights. The legitimacy of the limitation of shareholders' rights is manifested in the theory of company contract, the principle of equality of shareholders, the idea of fairness and justice. The principle of good faith and the balance of interests. In the case of defective capital contribution by shareholders, the proportional equity should be restricted according to the actual situation of the defective contribution, and in principle should be exercised in proportion to the actual contribution. But the non-proportional equity should not be restricted. As far as the ways of restricting shareholders' rights of defective capital contribution are concerned, there are several kinds of restrictions through laws, regulations or judicial interpretations, articles of association of companies and decisions of shareholders' meetings. Chapter 4th puts forward the legal thinking of perfecting the limitation of shareholders' rights of defective capital contribution in our country. The current legislation and judicature of our country still need to perfect the regulation of shareholders' rights restriction of defective capital contribution, which should be based on the limitation standard. The limitation path is further defined, and on this basis, the system of shareholder delisting of defective capital contribution in China is improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 岳嵐;論瑕疵出資股東權(quán)利的有限性[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

2 范詩恒;股東瑕疵出資的權(quán)利限制問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

3 錢云燕;論瑕疵出資股東的股權(quán)限制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

4 張彥博;瑕疵出資的股東權(quán)利限制法律問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

5 鄧清月;有限責(zé)任公司瑕疵出資股東的民事責(zé)任[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1532288