本文關(guān)鍵詞： 股東代表訴訟 派生訴訟 中小股東 公司法　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會中，公司是最主要和最普遍的贏利性法人,它對社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展做出了巨大的貢獻(xiàn)。股東的投資是公司存在的基礎(chǔ)，因此,各國公司法的目標(biāo)之一便是保護(hù)好股東的權(quán)利和激發(fā)股東的投資熱情。由于股東會中心主義向董事會中心主義的轉(zhuǎn)變，董事會的權(quán)力日益擴(kuò)大，現(xiàn)實(shí)社會中經(jīng)常會出現(xiàn)董事和高級管理人員濫用權(quán)力損害公司和其他股東利益的情況。在這種背景下許多公司監(jiān)督機(jī)制紛紛出臺，股東代表訴訟制度即是眾多公司監(jiān)督機(jī)制之一。19世紀(jì)初英美國家衡平法首次確定了股東派生訴訟制度，該制度從產(chǎn)生到今天已有一百多年的歷史，經(jīng)過這一百多年的考驗(yàn)和發(fā)展，股東代表訴訟制度在英美國家得到了不斷的創(chuàng)新和完善。不但廣大中小股東的權(quán)益會得到該制度的保護(hù)，而且公司的利益和公司債權(quán)人的利益也會得到股東代表訴訟制度的保護(hù)。股東派生訴訟制度被譽(yù)為英美法系國家的一項(xiàng)偉大的發(fā)明。 我國立法機(jī)關(guān)于2005年10月27號首次將股東代表訴訟制度寫入我國修訂后的《公司法》，這一立法活動標(biāo)志著股東代表訴訟制度在中國的真正確立。但是修訂后的《公司法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定并不完善且原則性較強(qiáng),在具體操作上仍然存在很多缺陷和不足，并且我國股東代表訴訟制度的確立比較晚。與我國相比，一些發(fā)達(dá)國家股東代表訴訟制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定比較完善，，這對于完善我國股東代表訴訟制度具有重大的借鑒和指導(dǎo)意義。因次，本文通過列舉我國股東代表訴訟制度存在的問題以及介紹外國關(guān)于股東代表訴訟制度的立法和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，從以下幾個方面系統(tǒng)地提出了完善我國股東代表訴訟制度的建議。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the company is the most important and most profitable Corporation, made a great contribution to the development of social economy. The investment of the shareholders is the basis, are therefore, one goal of the national company law is to protect the rights of shareholders and shareholders to stimulate investment enthusiasm. Due to the change of shareholders' meeting center to the center of board of directors, the board of directors of the growing power, emergence of directors and senior management personnel abuse of power to harm the interests of the company and other shareholders often in real society. In this context the supervision mechanism of many companies have introduced the system of shareholder representative litigation is one of many companies supervision mechanism of.19 century England the United States home equity for the first time to determine the shareholder derivative litigation system, the system from the beginning to today has more than 100 years of history, after more than 100 years of development and test of the shareholders. Representative litigation system in western countries has been continuously innovation and improvement. Not only the interests of minority shareholders will get the protection of the system, but also the interests of the company and the interests of creditors are protected. Shareholder litigation on behalf of the shareholder derivative litigation system is regarded as a great invention of Anglo American law system.
China's legislature on October 27, 2005 for the first time, the shareholder representative litigation system of our country company law written < > revised, this legislation marks the true establishment of shareholder litigation on behalf of Chinese. But the relevant provisions of the company law revised < > is not perfect and strong in principle, in practice there are still many the flaws and shortcomings, and the establishment of shareholder representative litigation system in China is relatively late. Compared with China, the relevant provisions of some developed countries, the shareholder representative litigation system more perfect, which is of great reference and guiding significance to improve the shareholder representative litigation system in our country. So this paper lists the existing shareholder representative litigation system and the introduction of foreign legislation on the shareholder representative litigation system and practice experience, from the following aspects systematically put forward to perfect our shareholder representative litigation system The degree of the proposal.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.291.91;D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甘培忠;論股東派生訴訟在中國的有效適用[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年05期

2 宣偉華;股東代表訴訟初探[J];法學(xué);1999年06期

3 王茂林;論我國股東代表訴訟制度的構(gòu)建[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

4 王巖;略論股東派生訴訟的當(dāng)事人[J];前沿;2002年11期

5 陳麗麗;股東派生訴訟的程序設(shè)計(jì)對公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)的影響[J];法學(xué)論壇;2000年04期

6 張民安;派生訴訟研究[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;1998年06期

7 石少俠;論股東訴訟與股權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2002年02期

8 雷興虎,胡桂霞;論董事行使職權(quán)的事前、事中和事后制衡機(jī)制[J];政法論壇;2001年02期

9 江偉,段厚省;論股東訴權(quán)[J];浙江社會科學(xué);1999年03期

10 漆丹;;我國股東訴訟制度體系的構(gòu)建[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉俊海;[N];中國社會科學(xué)院院報(bào);2004年

本文編號：1508602