本文關(guān)鍵詞： 商事判斷規(guī)則 客觀誠信 注意義務(wù) 忠實義務(wù) 董事失信　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：董事問責(zé)的誠信路徑是在傳統(tǒng)公司法上董事的注意義務(wù)和忠實義務(wù)的基礎(chǔ)上,賦予公司董事以誠信義務(wù),賦予誠信義務(wù)以獨立地位,將誠信義務(wù)和注意義務(wù)、忠實義務(wù)并駕齊驅(qū),確立董事信義義務(wù)三分法。董事問責(zé)的誠信路徑對現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟中公司的長遠(yuǎn)健康發(fā)展以及董事信義義務(wù)的實現(xiàn)均具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文以董事的誠信義務(wù)為研究對象,主要是基于傳統(tǒng)公司法上的注意義務(wù)和忠實義務(wù)難以涵射董事的所有失信行為,本文從分析誠信義務(wù)產(chǎn)生的原因入手,闡述分析董事誠信義務(wù)的獨立地位,在分析董事問責(zé)縫隙的基礎(chǔ)上,提出董事誠信義務(wù)的問責(zé)對象。論文共分六個部分,由導(dǎo)論開篇,其后由四章組成文章的主體部分,最后由結(jié)語收尾。 導(dǎo)論部分主要說明論文選題的背景和研究意義,介紹論文寫作思路以及研究方法,并指出論文存在的不足。 第一章以誠信路徑產(chǎn)生的緣由為題,運用實證分析和比較分析相結(jié)合的方法指出董事誠信義務(wù)產(chǎn)生的原因。通過辨證分析董事享有的權(quán)利和義務(wù)以及傳統(tǒng)意義上董事注意義務(wù)存在的缺陷,論證出在董事失信的情形下,董事誠信義務(wù)存在的必要性 第二章以誠信路徑的產(chǎn)生為題,在前述的基礎(chǔ)理論上,主要就誠信義務(wù)的法律地位進行分析研究,通過比較傳統(tǒng)意義上主觀誠信的不足,提出客觀誠信,進而論證出誠信義務(wù)具有獨立的法律地位,并以行為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)確立誠信義務(wù)。 第三章以誠信義務(wù)的問責(zé)功能為題,在前述分析誠信義務(wù)具有獨立的法律地位的基礎(chǔ)上,運用規(guī)范分析和比較分析的方法論證出誠信路徑是董事問責(zé)空隙的填補機制、股東信息上下一致的約束機制以及公司交易中善意第三人的保護機制。 第四章以誠信義務(wù)的問責(zé)對象以及我國董事問責(zé)誠信路徑的構(gòu)建為題,指出誠信義務(wù)的問責(zé)對象,將董事故意讓公司違法、不坦誠告知、濫用職權(quán)以及嚴(yán)重失職的情形納入到董事誠信義務(wù)的涵射范疇,并希冀我國能夠通過《公司法》的司法解釋界定誠信義務(wù)的行為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),從而引入誠信問責(zé)路徑。 結(jié)語部分總結(jié)全文,進一步強調(diào)董事誠信義務(wù)存在的重要意義,并指出將誠信義務(wù)與傳統(tǒng)的注意義務(wù)和忠實義務(wù)并駕齊驅(qū)的信義義務(wù)三分法也為我國司法實踐中董事的問責(zé)道路提供了指引。
[Abstract]:The good faith path of directors' accountability is based on the directors' duty of care and loyalty in the traditional company law, which endows the directors with the duty of good faith, gives the duty of good faith with the independent status, and gives the duty of good faith and duty of care. The faithful obligation goes hand in hand and establishes the three-point law of directors' fiduciary duty. The good faith path of directors' accountability is of great practical significance to the long-term healthy development of the company in the modern market economy and the realization of the director's fiduciary duty. This article takes the director's good faith duty as the research object, is mainly based on the traditional company law duty of care and the faithful duty cannot contain all the directors' discredit behavior, this article starts with the analysis of the reason of the good faith obligation. On the basis of analyzing the gap of directors' accountability, this paper expounds the independent position of directors' fiduciary obligation, and puts forward the object of directors' fiduciary duty. The thesis is divided into six parts, which is opened by introduction. After that, it consists of four chapters, and ends with the conclusion. The introduction mainly explains the background and significance of the thesis, introduces the ideas and research methods of the thesis, and points out the shortcomings of the thesis. The first chapter focuses on the cause of the path of good faith. Using the combination of empirical analysis and comparative analysis, this paper points out the reasons of directors' bona fide obligations. Through dialectical analysis of directors' rights and obligations and the defects of traditional directors' duty of care. This paper demonstrates the necessity of the director's fiduciary duty under the circumstance of the director's dishonesty. The second chapter focuses on the emergence of the path of good faith, in the aforementioned basic theory, mainly on the legal status of the obligation of good faith analysis and research, by comparing the traditional sense of the lack of subjective integrity, put forward the objective integrity. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the duty of good faith has independent legal status, and establishes the obligation of good faith according to the standard of conduct. The third chapter focuses on the accountability function of the bona fide obligation on the basis of the above analysis that the bona fide obligation has an independent legal status. By means of normative analysis and comparative analysis, it is demonstrated that the good faith path is the mechanism to fill the gap between directors' accountability, the constraint mechanism of the consistent information of shareholders and the protection mechanism of bona fide third party in the company transaction. Chapter 4th focuses on the accountability object of the duty of good faith and the construction of the path of the honesty and credit of the director of our country, points out the object of the accountability of the obligation of good faith, and tells the director intentionally that the company is in violation of the law. Abuse of power and serious dereliction of duty are brought into the category of directors' fiduciary duty, and it is hoped that our country can define the behavior standard of good faith obligation through the judicial interpretation of Company Law. In order to introduce integrity accountability path. The conclusion part summarizes the full text, further emphasizes the director good faith duty existence significance. It is also pointed out that the three-point fiduciary obligation, which equates the duty of good faith with the traditional duty of care and duty of loyalty, also provides guidance for the accountability of directors in judicial practice in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 曾怡;關(guān)于董事善管義務(wù)的立法思考[J];法學(xué);1998年10期

2 王偉;;“國資損失逾千萬可能終身不得任國企老總”的悖論[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2007年01期

3 羅培新;董事忠實義務(wù)的確立與完善[J];經(jīng)濟導(dǎo)刊;1998年06期

4 張維迎,柯榮住;信任及其解釋:來自中國的跨省調(diào)查分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2002年10期

5 徐國棟;誠實信用原則二題[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年04期

6 羅培新;公司法的合同路徑與公司法規(guī)則的正當(dāng)性[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

7 徐國棟;英語世界中的誠信原則[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2004年03期

8 朱羿錕;;論董事問責(zé)的誠信路徑[J];中國法學(xué);2008年03期

9 徐國棟;客觀誠信與主觀誠信的對立統(tǒng)一問題——以羅馬法為中心[J];中國社會科學(xué);2001年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 本報評論員 周虎城;[N];南方日報;2007年

2 本報記者　徐炯;[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟報道;2005年

，

本文編號：1477825