發(fā)布時間：2018-01-30 19:36

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 董事 第三人 責(zé)任　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 董事在執(zhí)行職務(wù)行為中,會與第三人發(fā)生許多法律關(guān)系。為防止董事濫用職權(quán)損害第三人利益,許多國家和地區(qū)制定了董事對第三人責(zé)任制度。由于立法層次低,我國董事對第三人責(zé)任制度并不能有效制約董事濫用權(quán)力,現(xiàn)實(shí)中已發(fā)生了董事侵害第三人利益的惡性事件,第三人與董事之間的矛盾沖突日益尖銳。結(jié)合我國實(shí)際,為了緩和董事與第三人之間的失衡局面,迫切需要完善董事對第三人責(zé)任制度,利用該制度來保護(hù)第三人利益、維護(hù)公司利益、防止董事濫用權(quán)力、完善公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)。傳統(tǒng)理論從法人本質(zhì)說出發(fā),論證董事與第三人沒有直接法律關(guān)系,卻忽略了董事與第三人之間實(shí)質(zhì)是外部關(guān)系而不是內(nèi)部關(guān)系。董事對第三人責(zé)任制度是符合誠實(shí)信用原則、公平正義、社會責(zé)任理念的,它不是對公司獨(dú)立責(zé)任制度的否認(rèn),而是對公司獨(dú)立承擔(dān)責(zé)任制度的調(diào)整、完善。我國完善董事對第三人責(zé)任制度可以從以下幾個方面入手：首先要提高立法層次完善該制度,彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有制度不具有普遍性的缺陷；對制度作出詳細(xì)的、全面的定義,以彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有法律適用情形單一的局限性；其次,從法律實(shí)施和法律技術(shù)的要求而言,應(yīng)當(dāng)明確董事對第三人責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)成要件；最后,董事對第三人責(zé)任制度需要和其他法律制度相配合才能更充分發(fā)揮作用。 結(jié)合我國實(shí)際,應(yīng)突破傳統(tǒng)觀念和理論障礙,完善董事對第三人責(zé)任制度,要求董事在經(jīng)營活動中考慮第三人利益,對其在職務(wù)行為中造成第三人的損害承擔(dān)責(zé)任,這與我國《公司法》第一條規(guī)定的將保護(hù)債權(quán)人和股東權(quán)益的宗旨是相一致的。
[Abstract]:In order to prevent the directors from abusing their power to harm the interests of the third party, the directors will have a lot of legal relations with the third party in the execution of their duties. Many countries and regions have formulated the system of directors' liability to the third party. Because of the low level of legislation, the system of directors' liability to the third party can not effectively restrict the directors' abuse of power. In reality, there has been a vicious incident in which the director infringed the interests of the third party, and the contradiction between the third person and the director has become increasingly sharp. In order to ease the imbalance between the director and the third person, the reality of our country has been combined in order to alleviate the imbalance between the director and the third party. It is urgent to perfect the system of directors' liability to the third party, to protect the interests of the third party, to safeguard the interests of the company, to prevent the directors from abusing their power, and to perfect the corporate governance structure. The author argues that there is no direct legal relationship between the director and the third party, but neglects that the essence of the relationship between the director and the third party is external rather than internal. The system of directors' liability to the third party conforms to the principle of good faith and is fair and just. The concept of social responsibility is not the denial of the independent responsibility system of the company, but the adjustment of the independent responsibility system of the company. Consummate. Our country consummates the director to the third party responsibility system may start from the following several aspects: first, must raise the legislation level to consummate this system, makes up the existing system not to have the universal flaw; To make a detailed and comprehensive definition of the system in order to make up for the limitation of the single application of the existing law; Secondly, from the legal implementation and the requirements of legal technology, we should make clear the constituent elements of the liability system of directors to the third party; Finally, directors need to cooperate with other legal systems in order to play a more full role in the third party liability system. In combination with the reality of our country, we should break through the traditional ideas and theoretical obstacles, perfect the system of directors' liability to the third party, and require the directors to consider the interests of the third party in their business activities. It is consistent with the purpose of protecting the rights and interests of creditors and shareholders stipulated in Article 1 of the Company Law of our country to bear the responsibility for the damage caused by the third party in the act of duty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王廣玉;論董事對第三人的民事責(zé)任[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

2 趙新燕;公司董事對第三人的責(zé)任制度研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

3 周文慧;論董事對第三人責(zé)任[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1477065