本文關(guān)鍵詞：公司破產(chǎn)與董事對(duì)債權(quán)人的義務(wù)和責(zé)任　出處：《上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2014年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 破產(chǎn)法 賠償責(zé)任 破產(chǎn)申請(qǐng)義務(wù) 忠實(shí)義務(wù) 勤勉義務(wù)

【摘要】：公司破產(chǎn)時(shí),其財(cái)產(chǎn)不足以清償債務(wù)。如果對(duì)股東負(fù)有忠實(shí)義務(wù)和勤勉義務(wù)的董事仍然以股東利益為中心,則會(huì)損害債權(quán)人利益。為了保護(hù)債權(quán)人,西方國(guó)家都規(guī)定了公司破產(chǎn)時(shí)董事對(duì)債權(quán)人的義務(wù)和責(zé)任,其立法模式包括前端模式、后端模式和全程模式三類。我國(guó)《公司法》沒(méi)有規(guī)定董事對(duì)債權(quán)人的義務(wù)和責(zé)任,《破產(chǎn)法》對(duì)此問(wèn)題有所規(guī)定,但存在較多問(wèn)題。為了加強(qiáng)對(duì)債權(quán)人的保護(hù),我國(guó)《破產(chǎn)法》需要在全程模式立法框架指導(dǎo)下,規(guī)定企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時(shí)董事等管理人員因惡意或重大過(guò)失造成企業(yè)破產(chǎn)對(duì)債權(quán)人承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任,賦予其破產(chǎn)申請(qǐng)義務(wù),明確企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時(shí)董事等管理人員對(duì)債權(quán)人負(fù)忠實(shí)義務(wù)和勤勉義務(wù),同時(shí)規(guī)定其免責(zé)條件,并明確債權(quán)人的追責(zé)方式。
[Abstract]:The company goes bankrupt, its property is not enough to pay off the debts. If bears the duty of loyalty and diligence of the board of shareholders is still in the interests of shareholders as the center, it will damage the interests of creditors. In order to protect the creditor, the western countries have provided the bankruptcy of directors to creditors obligation and responsibility, the legislative model including the front, rear the whole class mode and mode three. Our company law > < no provisions of duty and liability of directors to creditors, "some provisions of this problem of bankruptcy law, but there are many problems. In order to strengthen the protection of the creditor, China's bankruptcy law in the whole" > legislative framework mode under the guidance of enterprise bankruptcy provisions of directors the management personnel of the enterprise bankruptcy creditor liable for damages caused by malicious or gross negligence, given its bankruptcy filing obligations, clear enterprise bankruptcy of directors to the creditors of negative The duty of loyalty and the duty of diligence, at the same time stipulate the disclaimer, and clear the way for the creditor to take responsibility.

【作者單位】： 昆明理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：昆明理工大學(xué)人才培養(yǎng)項(xiàng)目“中日破產(chǎn)重整制度比較研究”(KKSY201224005) 中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)項(xiàng)目“上市公司重整的法律邏輯與制度構(gòu)建”(CLS2013D164)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291
【正文快照】： 中共十八屆三中全會(huì)通過(guò)的《中共中央關(guān)于全面深化改革若干重大問(wèn)題的決定》強(qiáng)調(diào)建設(shè)統(tǒng)一開(kāi)放、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)有序的市場(chǎng)體系,使市場(chǎng)在資源配置中起決定性作用,并提出“健全優(yōu)勝劣汰市場(chǎng)化退出機(jī)制,完善企業(yè)破產(chǎn)制度”。因此,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的全面深化,壟斷將被全面抑制,市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)會(huì)

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 馮果;柴瑞娟;;論董事對(duì)公司債權(quán)人的責(zé)任[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 林恩偉;馬效軍;;論有限責(zé)任公司的債權(quán)人保護(hù)——以公司債權(quán)人介入公司治理的自我救濟(jì)為導(dǎo)向[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

2 王q，

本文編號(hào)：1393574