發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-12 15:14

【摘要】：在新一輪司法體制改革背景下,作為檢察權(quán)運(yùn)行機(jī)制改革重要舉措之一的檢察官辦案責(zé)任制正在各試點(diǎn)地區(qū)全力推進(jìn)落實(shí)。檢察官辦案責(zé)任制的中心內(nèi)容是突出檢察官在履行司法職能時(shí)的主體地位,最顯著的特征是主體地位的突出化、辦案組織的司法化、人員的精英化、司法的專業(yè)化、管理的扁平化。然而隨著辦案責(zé)任制改革的不斷推進(jìn),現(xiàn)行檢委會(huì)制度由于其自身體制缺陷的限制,逐漸與主任檢察官辦案組間產(chǎn)生矛盾。主要表現(xiàn)為:一是檢委會(huì)制度的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定與檢察官辦案責(zé)任制的要求相脫節(jié);二是檢委會(huì)的限權(quán)本質(zhì)與檢察官辦案責(zé)任制的放權(quán)要求相沖突;三是檢委會(huì)的問責(zé)機(jī)制缺失與檢察官案件責(zé)任終身負(fù)責(zé)制相違背;四是檢委會(huì)委員專業(yè)化水平與檢察官專業(yè)化的要求有差距;五是檢委會(huì)決策行政化與檢察官辦案司法化相矛盾。為科學(xué)理順二者間關(guān)系,筆者認(rèn)為有必要在堅(jiān)持法治、各司其職、相互配合及逐步放權(quán)等原則的基礎(chǔ)上,實(shí)現(xiàn)二者順利銜接,并通過健全檢委會(huì)的有關(guān)立法、加強(qiáng)檢委會(huì)專業(yè)化、制度化、規(guī)范化等工作機(jī)制的建設(shè),最終實(shí)現(xiàn)1+12的效果,為新形勢(shì)下檢察工作的需要產(chǎn)生更大的合力。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the new round of judicial system reform, as one of the important measures to reform the operation mechanism of procuratorial power, the responsibility system of handling cases by prosecutors is being carried out in all pilot areas. The central content of the procurator's case handling responsibility system is to highlight the principal position of the procurator in the performance of judicial functions. The most prominent characteristics are the salience of the subject status, the judicialization of the case handling organization, the elitism of the personnel, and the specialization of the judicature. The flattening of management. However, with the continuous progress of the reform of the case handling responsibility system, the current prosecution committee system has gradually contradicted the chief prosecutor's handling team because of the limitation of its own system defects. The main manifestations are as follows: first, the relevant legal provisions of the prosecution committee system are out of touch with the requirements of the procurator case responsibility system, the second is that the limited nature of the prosecution committee conflicts with the decentralization requirements of the procurator handling case responsibility system; Third, the lack of accountability mechanism of the prosecution committee is contrary to the system of lifelong responsibility for prosecutors' cases, fourth, there is a gap between the professional level of the members of the prosecution committee and the requirements of the professionalization of prosecutors. Fifth, the administrative decision-making of the prosecution committee contradicts the judicial handling of cases by prosecutors. In order to straighten out the relationship between the two scientifically, the author believes that it is necessary to realize the smooth connection between the two on the basis of adhering to the principles of the rule of law, performing their respective duties, cooperating with each other and gradually decentralizing power, and adopting the relevant legislation of the prosecution committee. Strengthen the construction of professional, institutionalized and standardized working mechanism of the procuratorial committee, and finally realize the effect of 112, so as to produce greater joint force for the need of procuratorial work under the new situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張自超;;檢察官辦案責(zé)任制與檢察委員會(huì)決策制的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年09期

2 劉晴;;檢察官辦案責(zé)任制的比較與選擇[J];人民檢察;2015年11期

3 王玨;;主任檢察官之域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)與借鑒[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

4 張保生;張晃榕;;檢察業(yè)務(wù)考評(píng)與錯(cuò)案責(zé)任追究機(jī)制的完善[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2014年04期

5 蔡巍;;檢察官辦案責(zé)任制比較研究[J];人民檢察;2013年14期

6 左德起;鄭慧;;試論檢委會(huì)決定書的公開化——以基層人民檢察院為視角[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2011年02期

7 羅樹中;;檢察委員會(huì)科學(xué)決策機(jī)制研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年01期

8 鄧思清;;再論我國(guó)檢察委員會(huì)制度改革[J];人民檢察;2010年11期

9 黃海;梁曉淮;;論檢察委員會(huì)的法律地位及其改革完善[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

10 王啟庭;;判決不同意見書的法律價(jià)值與制度建構(gòu)——司法公開與裁判文書的創(chuàng)新[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2006年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 黃敬波;;強(qiáng)化檢委會(huì)議案的司法屬性[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 潘祖全;;主任檢察官制度值得進(jìn)一步探索[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

3 張建偉;;錯(cuò)案責(zé)任泛化無助司法獨(dú)立人格養(yǎng)成[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2475478