【摘要】： 調(diào)解制度作為一項頗具中國特色的法律制度,以其獨特方式化解矛盾,調(diào)和沖突,平衡社會關(guān)系,在現(xiàn)代法治社會中發(fā)揮著重要的作用。伴隨著依法治國的實踐進程,調(diào)解又衍生出多樣的形式,三調(diào)聯(lián)動機制正是其中之一。作為一種新型的調(diào)解制度,對其的研究還比較少,本文主要通過結(jié)合本人所在湖南省湘潭市的三調(diào)聯(lián)動案例和相關(guān)法學(xué)理論對這一制度進行分析和思考。 第一章,三調(diào)聯(lián)動機制的概述和價值分析。本章首先對三調(diào)聯(lián)動的概念進行分析說明,再以湘潭市三調(diào)聯(lián)動為藍本結(jié)合案例對三調(diào)聯(lián)動的組織機構(gòu)和運作方式做分析說明并總結(jié)其特征。最后對三調(diào)聯(lián)動機制的價值進行分析。 第二章,三調(diào)聯(lián)動產(chǎn)生的背景和原因分析。本章主要從四個方面來分析其背景和產(chǎn)生的原因,首先分析了三調(diào)聯(lián)動是在中國當代社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期的社會矛盾復(fù)雜性的大背景下產(chǎn)生的,其次分析了該機制的產(chǎn)生離不開中國的傳統(tǒng)調(diào)解文化背景,再次,作為民間調(diào)解的核心人民調(diào)解遭遇了各種困境,最后分析法院面臨日益增長的訴訟壓力和訴訟本身的局限性促使了三調(diào)聯(lián)動的產(chǎn)生。 第三章,對三調(diào)聯(lián)動的反思。本章從法治,司法公正,調(diào)解自愿,社會自治幾個角度分析了三調(diào)聯(lián)動所存在的問題并提出相關(guān)建議。 第四章,建設(shè)有中國特色的非訴訟糾紛解決機制(ADR)。本章從三個方面展開,首先對美、英、日、德幾個西方發(fā)達國家的非訴訟糾紛解決機制進行了介紹和比較分析,從而借鑒其經(jīng)驗。其次,提出中國特色的非訴訟糾紛解決機制應(yīng)該是以訴訟為主導(dǎo)地位,各種非訴訟糾紛解決機制與司法訴訟有機結(jié)合的一種機制。最后提出對三調(diào)聯(lián)動的未來發(fā)展建議,作為一種新型的且具有中國特色的非訴訟糾紛解決機制它的應(yīng)該建設(shè)成一種維護司法權(quán)威,幫助中國實現(xiàn)自主型法治的高效的非訴訟糾紛解決機制。
[Abstract]:As a legal system with Chinese characteristics, mediation system plays an important role in modern rule of law society by resolving conflicts, reconciling conflicts and balancing social relations in its unique way. Along with the practice of ruling the country according to law, mediation derives a variety of forms, and the three-tone linkage mechanism is one of them. As a new mediation system, the research on it is still relatively little. This paper mainly analyzes and ponders this system by combining the case of three-tone linkage in Xiangtan City, Hunan Province, and the relevant law theory. The first chapter is the overview and value analysis of the three-tone linkage mechanism. In this chapter, the concept of three-tone linkage is first analyzed and explained, and then the organization and operation mode of three-tone linkage are analyzed and illustrated with a case study of Xiangtan city, and the characteristics of the three-tone linkage are summarized. Finally, the value of the three-tone linkage mechanism is analyzed. The second chapter, the background and the reason analysis of the triad linkage. This chapter mainly analyzes its background and reasons from four aspects. First of all, it analyzes that the three-tone linkage is produced under the background of the complexity of social contradictions in the period of social transformation in contemporary China. Secondly, it analyzes that the formation of this mechanism is inseparable from the cultural background of traditional mediation in China. Again, as the core of folk mediation, people's mediation has encountered various difficulties. Finally, it is analyzed that the court is faced with increasing litigation pressure and the limitation of litigation itself to promote the emergence of the three-tone linkage. The third chapter, the reflection on the three-tone linkage. This chapter analyzes the problems existing in the three-tone linkage from the angles of rule of law, judicial justice, voluntary mediation and social autonomy, and puts forward some suggestions. Chapter IV, Construction of non-litigation dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADR). With Chinese characteristics This chapter starts from three aspects. Firstly, it introduces and compares the non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism of several western developed countries, such as the United States, Britain, Japan and Germany, so as to draw lessons from their experiences. Secondly, it is pointed out that the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism with Chinese characteristics should be a kind of mechanism which takes litigation as the leading position and combines various non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms with judicial litigation. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions for the future development of the three-tone linkage. As a new type of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism with Chinese characteristics, it should be built into a kind of safeguarding judicial authority. To help China to achieve autonomous rule of law, an efficient non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱星美;;當代調(diào)解制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2009年04期

2 張曉曉;;我國現(xiàn)行民事調(diào)解制度與ADR[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟與文化;2008年09期

3 范愉;社會轉(zhuǎn)型中的人民調(diào)解制度——以上海市長寧區(qū)人民調(diào)解組織改革的經(jīng)驗為視點[J];中國司法;2004年10期

4 石先廣;;人民調(diào)解、行政調(diào)解、司法調(diào)解有機銜接的對策思考——以上海市楊浦區(qū)整合調(diào)解資源的實踐探索為視點[J];中國司法;2006年08期

5 李冰;;湖南省“三調(diào)聯(lián)動”工作機制的考察與思考[J];中國司法;2008年08期

6 章武生;;論我國大調(diào)解機制的構(gòu)建——兼析大調(diào)解與ADR的關(guān)系[J];法商研究;2007年06期

7 張衛(wèi)平;人民調(diào)解:完善與發(fā)展的路徑[J];法學(xué);2002年12期

8 毋愛斌;;對我國人民調(diào)解各地模式的考察[J];法治論壇;2009年02期

9 顧培東;;中國法治的自主型進路[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年01期

10 李浩;調(diào)解的比較優(yōu)勢與法院調(diào)解制度的改革[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 倪萍;大調(diào)解機制研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

2 李年終;我國“訴調(diào)對接”的理論與實踐研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

3 翟偉偉;從法律文化的角度看我國的民間調(diào)解制度[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

4 王洪娟;大調(diào)解研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2432449