【摘要】：檢察執(zhí)法指導案例的適用階段為檢驗案例指導制度成敗的關(guān)鍵步驟。在指導性案例適用標準上,檢察官囿于司法便宜主義和穩(wěn)妥路線的考量,必將于程序上先進行案例比對工作,而后才尋找相關(guān)法律依據(jù),以致出現(xiàn)理論與實踐背離的境況。為解決此問題,有必要展開指導性案例適用的技術(shù)分析,既吸收判例法體系中的歸類與區(qū)別技術(shù),又注重我國檢察指導案例的特殊性,并以指導案例監(jiān)督機能構(gòu)筑合理、有效的案例指導補救機制,在完成監(jiān)督任務(wù)的同時,也需避免增加額外的壓力而讓檢察官陷入僵死教條而照搬指導性案例。
[Abstract]:The application stage of procuratorial law enforcement guidance cases is the key step to test the success or failure of case guidance system. In the standard of guiding case application, the prosecutor is bound to carry out the case comparison in procedure first, and then to find the relevant legal basis, which leads to the situation that the theory and practice deviate from each other. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to carry out the technical analysis of guiding cases, which not only absorbs the classification and differentiation techniques in the case law system, but also pays attention to the particularity of the cases of procuratorial guidance in our country. An effective case guidance remedy mechanism, while completing oversight tasks, also needs to avoid adding additional pressure to allow prosecutors to freeze their dogma and copy the guiding case.
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;
【基金】：最高人民檢察院檢察理論研究重點課題(GJ2010B14)
【分類號】：D926.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊力;;中國案例指導運作研究[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2008年06期

2 梁迎修;;判例法的邏輯——兼論我國案例指導制度的構(gòu)建[J];法律方法與法律思維;2007年00期

3 董v，

本文編號：2421211