【摘要】：我國的檢察委員會制度，是在借鑒蘇聯(lián)檢察制度的基礎(chǔ)上同我國的國情相結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物，是民主制在檢察體制建設(shè)中的折射。隨著我國司法改革進(jìn)程的推進(jìn)，檢察改革也正處于進(jìn)行時，檢察委員會作為我國檢察制度較為典型的一部分，不可避免地參與到了改革浪潮之中。從1999年檢察委員會制度開始改革以來，檢察委員會的改革工作取得了一定的成效。不過，總體來看，雖然這些改革在一定程度上強(qiáng)化了檢察委員會的職能，但均是局部性改良，檢察委員會的職能并未得到實質(zhì)性的優(yōu)化。同時，改革也還面臨著一定的理論困境和目的困境。為了能對檢察委員會制度的改革有所裨益，本文主要分四個部分，從四個方面分別對我國檢察委員會制度進(jìn)行了研究：第一部分，主要以我國建國后的規(guī)范性法律文件為基礎(chǔ)，從四個方面對我國檢察委員會制度的演變過程進(jìn)行梳理和比較；第二部分，主要從改革的角度討論了關(guān)于我國檢察委員會制度的存與廢的問題，并提出和論證了我國檢察委員會制度應(yīng)當(dāng)保留的觀點(diǎn)；第三部分，分別從發(fā)展的視角闡述了我國檢察委員會制度的改革方向，從權(quán)力運(yùn)行的角度分析了檢察委員會與檢察院內(nèi)外部各方的關(guān)系；從對“重大”進(jìn)行合理解釋的角度，對檢察委員會的職權(quán)范圍進(jìn)行了重新分析；從檢察委員會職能的“二元性”，提出了對我國檢察委員會決策程序進(jìn)行“二元化”模式構(gòu)建的設(shè)想；最后一部分，，通過對檢察委員會與審判委員會進(jìn)行簡單的對比，分析了檢察委員會與審判委員會在本質(zhì)上的區(qū)別。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial committee system of our country is the product of combining the procuratorial system of the Soviet Union with the national conditions of our country and the refraction of democracy in the construction of procuratorial system. With the advancement of judicial reform in our country, the procuratorial committee, as a typical part of the procuratorial system in our country, inevitably participates in the tide of reform. Since the reform of the procuratorial committee system began in 1999, the reform of the procuratorial committee has achieved certain results. However, in general, although these reforms have strengthened the functions of the procuratorial committee to some extent, they are all local improvements, and the functions of the procuratorial committee have not been substantially optimized. At the same time, the reform is also faced with a certain theoretical and objective dilemma. In order to benefit the reform of the procuratorial committee system, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part is mainly based on the normative legal documents after the founding of the people's Republic of China. The evolution process of the procuratorial committee system in China is combed and compared from four aspects. The second part mainly discusses the problem of the existence and abolishment of the procuratorial committee system from the angle of reform, and puts forward and demonstrates the viewpoint that the procuratorial committee system of our country should keep; The third part expounds the reform direction of the procuratorial committee system from the perspective of development and analyzes the relationship between the procuratorial committee and the internal and external parties of the procuratorate from the angle of power operation. From the angle of reasonable explanation of "important", this paper reanalyzes the terms of reference of the procuratorial committee; From the duality of the function of the procuratorial committee, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the dualistic mode of the decision-making procedure of the procuratorial committee in our country. In the last part, the author analyzes the essential difference between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee through a simple comparison between the procuratorial committee and the trial committee.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀衛(wèi)方;;關(guān)于審判委員會的幾點(diǎn)評論[J];北大法律評論;1998年02期

2 陳瑞華;;正義的誤區(qū)——評法院審判委員會制度[J];北大法律評論;1998年02期

3 葛洪義;試論法律論證的源流與旨趣[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年05期

4 陳光中,陳海光;中國刑事訴訟制度的進(jìn)一步完善[J];法律適用;2000年01期

5 張毅;王中開;;論檢察委員會的去行政化[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年04期

6 龍宗智;論檢察權(quán)的性質(zhì)與檢察機(jī)關(guān)的改革[J];法學(xué);1999年10期

7 鄧思清;;論我國檢察委員會制度改革[J];法學(xué);2010年01期

8 王姍;;檢察委員會制度初探[J];法制與社會;2010年31期

9 王志剛;;論我國檢察委員會制度之改革[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2009年03期

10 宋凱利;;試論檢察委員會的內(nèi)外部關(guān)系[J];中國檢察官;2011年05期

本文編號：2421189