【摘要】：“傳統(tǒng)”與“現(xiàn)代”不是天然的對(duì)立,傳統(tǒng)在經(jīng)歷了政權(quán)交替和社會(huì)變革之后仍然能保持旺盛的生命力,并能在不同的社會(huì)形態(tài)中以新的樣貌展現(xiàn)不變的風(fēng)姿。 人情的含義廣泛而復(fù)雜。人情在中國司法傳統(tǒng)的語境中主要包括了天性、感情、事實(shí)、風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣等方面的內(nèi)容。不僅如此,人情還具有強(qiáng)大的社會(huì)功能。它與西方語境中的民意有相似之處,但也有很大的不同。它們?cè)趦?nèi)容、性質(zhì)、表現(xiàn)和作用方面有很大的不同。我們必須充分理解中國司法傳統(tǒng)中的人情。我們必須充分理解封建農(nóng)民的中國、理解傳統(tǒng)法律文化、理解司法中的人情。 在近一百年的社會(huì)變遷中,人情經(jīng)歷了自身的發(fā)展。在意義、功能和強(qiáng)度上它部分地受到了消解,但仍然保留了一部分傳統(tǒng)。而社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的司法,也面臨著新的功能要求。在這個(gè)背景之下,能動(dòng)司法的改革舉措被提出來。能動(dòng)司法與“大調(diào)解”對(duì)于中國的政治、社會(huì)和法律具有重要的意義。它也是人情傳統(tǒng)在司法實(shí)踐中的延續(xù)和復(fù)現(xiàn)。 在中國的傳統(tǒng)治理模式下,法與治分不開,治與情也分不開,政治與司法分享了相同的終極目的即和諧,而情正是實(shí)現(xiàn)這一目的的有效工具和媒介。法與人情在當(dāng)下社會(huì)的轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期出現(xiàn)矛盾,正是因?yàn)樽鳛榇蠖鄶?shù)中國人共識(shí)的人情,有了更豐富和復(fù)雜的內(nèi)容,人情的作用與功能也發(fā)生了改變。這些內(nèi)容來自西方法治理念的灌輸,與傳統(tǒng)的人情天理進(jìn)行著激烈的碰撞。而一種傳統(tǒng)的平衡方法,體現(xiàn)在“能動(dòng)司法”的倡導(dǎo)和實(shí)踐中,秉承了中國人自己的“老辦法”,以解決中國人自己的“新問題”。中國法律的內(nèi)涵包含了法治理論中沒有的東西,而中國式司法也會(huì)呈現(xiàn)與西方司法不同的模式。只有充分理解中國式司法的人情傳統(tǒng),正確評(píng)價(jià)能動(dòng)司法改革措施,才能為我們的法治建設(shè)作出符合中國國情的預(yù)測(cè)。
[Abstract]:"tradition" and "modern" are not natural opposites, tradition can still maintain vigorous vitality after regime alternation and social change, and can display the same appearance in different social forms. The meaning of human feelings is wide and complex. In the context of Chinese judicial tradition, human feelings include nature, feelings, facts, customs and so on. Not only that, human relations also have a strong social function. It is similar to public opinion in the western context, but also very different. They differ greatly in content, nature, performance and function. We must fully understand human feelings in Chinese judicial tradition. We must fully understand the feudal peasants of China, understand the traditional legal culture, understand the human relations in the judiciary. In the past 100 years of social change, human feelings have experienced their own development. In meaning, function and strength, it is partially dispelled, but still retains some tradition. The judicial system in the period of social transformation also faces new functional requirements. In this context, active judicial reform measures were put forward. Active judicature and Great Mediation are of great significance to Chinese politics, society and law. It is also the continuation and reproduction of human tradition in judicial practice. Under the traditional governance mode in China, law and governance cannot be separated, and governance and emotion are inseparable. Politics and judicature share the same ultimate goal, that is, harmony, and emotion is the effective tool and medium to achieve this goal. There are contradictions between law and human feelings in the transition period of the present society. It is precisely because as most Chinese people agree that human feelings have richer and more complicated contents, and the functions and functions of human feelings have also changed. These contents come from the indoctrination of the western idea of rule of law and collide violently with the traditional human nature. A traditional balance method, embodied in the advocacy and practice of "active justice", inherits the "old methods" of the Chinese themselves to solve their own "new problems". The connotation of Chinese law contains something that is not found in the theory of rule of law. Only by fully understanding the custom tradition of Chinese judicial system and correctly evaluating the active judicial reform measures can we make a prediction in accordance with China's national conditions for the construction of the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龔曉京;人情、契約與信任[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年04期

2 李華;嚴(yán)紅;;和諧社會(huì)更需網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意的合理表達(dá)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年08期

3 顧培東;;司法能動(dòng)主義的蘊(yùn)含[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

4 張中秋;;概括的傳統(tǒng)中國的法理觀——以中國法律傳統(tǒng)對(duì)建構(gòu)中國法理學(xué)的意義為視點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)家;2010年02期

5 劉松山;;再論人民法院的“司法改革”之非[J];法學(xué);2006年01期

6 程宗璋;論現(xiàn)代法制與中國傳統(tǒng)法律文化[J];甘肅教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

7 王建國;;司法能動(dòng)的正當(dāng)性分析[J];河北法學(xué);2009年05期

8 公丕祥;;當(dāng)代中國能動(dòng)司法的意義分析[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

9 錢建平;;論傳統(tǒng)人情關(guān)系與現(xiàn)代公共規(guī)則的沖突和價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)換[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

10 李炳爍;;當(dāng)代中國語境下的能動(dòng)司法[J];理論探索;2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 賀小榮;[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2420776