發(fā)布時間：2019-02-11 12:23

【摘要】：檢察機關正名制度,是指檢察機關經調查后,查清被舉報人無犯罪事實,屬誤告、錯告或者誣告的,對被舉報人,就誤告、錯告或誣告的內容在一定范圍內澄清事實、消除影響的制度。如果說舉報人保護制度是檢察舉報制度的重點,那檢察機關正名制度則是硬幣的另一面,是具有中國特色檢察舉報制度中不可或缺的重要組成部分。檢察機關正名制度是伴隨我國檢察舉報制度的發(fā)展和完善而出現(xiàn)的一種新鮮事物,雖然目前學界對檢察機關正名制度關注不多,但其出現(xiàn)對于保護受到不實舉報的公民的合法權益意義重大,具有進一步推廣的價值。本文綜合運用分析、比較和實證等研究方法,對檢察機關正名制度進行了詳細的理論分析和梳理,除引言和結論及展望部分外,文章分為以下四個部分： 第一部分是檢察機關正名制度的簡介。由于少有文章論及,較多人對正名制度相當陌生,所以本部分著重介紹了正名制度的由來、內涵界定等內容,并用較大篇幅論述了檢察正名制度的實踐和理論基礎,讓大家對檢察機關正名制度有一個大體輪廓上的了解。 第二部分介紹了我國檢察機關正名制度的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題。由于種種原因,正名制度一出現(xiàn),便遇到了較多的質疑和反對聲音。對此,如何理性看待,并從中提煉出合理成分,裨益于正名制度在實踐中的不斷完善,是作者對之進行深入研究、探討和歸納的初衷。 第三部分著墨于檢察機關全面推行正名制度的意義。本來此內容完全可以作為第二部分的一個小節(jié)進行論述,但由于各界對正名制度的價值和存在必要性一直都存有爭議,甚至認為由檢察官出面來為公務員正名,是典型的現(xiàn)代版“官官相護”,以致正名制度有被污名化之虞,故筆者努力嘗試從多角度為正名制度進行積極的吶喊和“正名”。 第四部分是如何進一步完善我國的檢察機關正名制度。筆者從側重實務入手,詳細闡述了正名制度的立法路徑,檢察機關正名制度的主要原則、適用條件、審核批準程序、正名方式等內容,并對正名的排除適用條件進行了分析,希冀藉此為檢察機關正名制度的進一步完善獻出自己的綿力。
[Abstract]:The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ means that the procuratorial organ, after investigation, ascertains the fact that the informant is not guilty, is a false accusation, or falsely accuses him, and clarifies the facts within a certain scope on the contents of the false accusation or false accusation of the informer, A system for eliminating influence. If the whistleblower protection system is the focus of the procuratorial reporting system, then the procuratorial system is the other side of the coin, which is an indispensable part of the procuratorial reporting system with Chinese characteristics. The system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ is a new thing that appears along with the development and perfection of the procuratorial reporting system in our country, although the academic circles pay little attention to the system of correcting the name of the procuratorial organ at present. However, its appearance is of great significance to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens who have been untruthfully reported, and has the value of further promotion. This paper makes a detailed theoretical analysis and combing of the system of correcting the name of procuratorial organs by means of analysis, comparison and demonstration, except for the foreword, conclusion and prospect. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part is a brief introduction of the system of procuratorial organs. As few articles have been discussed and many people are quite unfamiliar with the system of correcting names, this part mainly introduces the origin, connotation and definition of the system, and discusses the practice and theoretical basis of the system of procuratorial correction of names. Let everybody to procuratorial organ correct name system has a general outline on the understanding. The second part introduces the current situation and existing problems of the system of procuratorial organs. For a variety of reasons, the emergence of the system, they met more doubts and objections. Therefore, how to treat it rationally and extract reasonable elements from it is the original intention for the author to deeply study, explore and induce the system of correct name in practice. The third part deals with the significance of carrying out the system of correction of name in the procuratorial organs in an all-round way. Originally, this content could have been discussed as a subsection of the second part. However, as all circles have always disputed the value and necessity of the system of rectification of names, they even thought that the public prosecutor should come forward to correct the name of civil servants. It is a typical modern version of "officials protect each other", so the system of correct name is in danger of being stigmatized, so the author tries hard to make a positive cry and "correct name" for the system from many angles. The fourth part is how to improve the system of procuratorial organs. Starting with the practice, the author expounds in detail the legislative path of the system, the main principles of the system, the conditions of application, the procedure of examination and approval, the method of correcting the name, and so on, and analyzes the applicable conditions for the exclusion of the correct name. I hope to use this to further improve the system of procuratorial organs to give their own strength.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 薛國君;李志剛;;農村基層組織成員職務犯罪的法律適用問題[J];當代法學;2011年01期

2 王義堯;寧玲玲;;檢察機關為被錯告誣告者正名制度的構建[J];重慶理工大學學報(社會科學);2012年09期

3 李建明;;署名舉報人對檢察機關不立案決定的監(jiān)督[J];人民檢察;2008年07期

4 單民;上官春光;;職務犯罪案件舉報風險與制度控制[J];人民檢察;2010年18期

5 馮鐵金;古代的舉報制度[J];政府法制;2003年20期

6 焦洪昌;"國家尊重和保障人權"的憲法分析[J];中國法學;2004年03期

7 王雅琴;;論公民檢舉權——政治參與的視角[J];中共青島市委黨校.青島行政學院學報;2009年11期

8 楊建順;;行政法視野中的社會管理創(chuàng)新[J];中國人民大學學報;2011年01期

9 房棟;關于實行“正名制度”的思考[J];政治與法律;2000年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 王偉;論我國舉報人合法權益保護制度的完善[D];中國政法大學;2011年

2 朱愛萍;論公職人員名譽權的限制[D];華東政法大學;2011年

3 彭啟昌;檢察舉報制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年

4 吳楠;公民舉報權的法律保障機制及其完善[D];安徽大學;2006年

5 程思;我國檢察舉報制度的改革路徑探析[D];湖南大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2419730