【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證是在民事執(zhí)行過(guò)程中，經(jīng)利害關(guān)系人申請(qǐng)或執(zhí)行法院依職權(quán)舉行的，由執(zhí)行法院組織并召集相關(guān)人員到場(chǎng)，以舉證、質(zhì)證和辯論等方式，公開聽(tīng)取利害關(guān)系人意見(jiàn)，查清事實(shí)，并居中做出裁決，保障法院執(zhí)行工作順利進(jìn)行的活動(dòng)。 民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證呈現(xiàn)出公開性、法定性、普適性和程序性等特征。是近幾年法院較青睞的執(zhí)行方式，它通過(guò)公開聽(tīng)取當(dāng)事人意見(jiàn)，化解執(zhí)行過(guò)程中的矛盾和糾紛，緩和矛盾，提高效率，增加法院執(zhí)行工作的透明度，促進(jìn)司法現(xiàn)代化的發(fā)展。由于目前我國(guó)缺乏對(duì)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證系統(tǒng)的法律規(guī)范，使得民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證實(shí)踐呈現(xiàn)出濃厚的地方色彩，隨意性較大，不利于民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的制度化發(fā)展，也不符合現(xiàn)代法治的要求。 為了進(jìn)一步規(guī)范民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證，有必要從立法上對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)范。具體來(lái)說(shuō)，比較理想的狀態(tài)就是制定《民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序法》，程序設(shè)置原則上應(yīng)當(dāng)注重效率，摒棄聽(tīng)證前的準(zhǔn)備程序，切忌把聽(tīng)證裝扮成準(zhǔn)開庭模式。 通過(guò)對(duì)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序的規(guī)范，以期更好的指導(dǎo)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證實(shí)踐，使聽(tīng)證實(shí)踐更加合法、規(guī)范，提高執(zhí)行行為的公開性和透明度，，最大程度的維護(hù)當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益，緩解“執(zhí)行難”問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:The civil execution hearing is held by the interested parties on the application of the interested parties or by the enforcement court ex officio during the civil execution process, and the execution court organizes and convenes the relevant personnel to the scene to provide evidence, cross-examination and debate, etc. Listen to interested parties openly, find out the facts, and make decisions in the center to ensure the smooth execution of the court. The civil execution hearing is characterized by openness, legality, universality and procedure. In recent years, the court has preferred the execution method. It solves the contradictions and disputes in the execution process, improves the efficiency, increases the transparency of the court's execution, and promotes the development of the judicial modernization by openly listening to the opinions of the parties concerned, resolving the contradictions and disputes in the process of execution. Due to the lack of legal norms for the civil execution hearing system in our country at present, the practice of civil execution hearing takes on a strong local color and is arbitrary, which is not conducive to the development of the systematization of civil execution hearing. Nor is it in line with the requirements of the modern rule of law. In order to further standardize the civil execution hearing, it is necessary to regulate it in legislation. Specifically, the ideal state is to formulate the Civil execution hearing procedure Law. In principle, the procedure setting should pay attention to efficiency, abandon the preparatory procedure before the hearing, and avoid pretending the hearing as a quasi-court mode. By standardizing the procedure of the civil execution hearing, in order to better guide the practice of the civil execution hearing, to make the hearing practice more legal and standardized, to improve the openness and transparency of the execution, and to maximize the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, Ease the problem of "difficult execution".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 婁正前;;執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序的反思與完善[J];法律適用;2005年12期

2 馮蘊(yùn)強(qiáng);“執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證”之必要與可行[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年03期

3 王曉明;;論民事執(zhí)行權(quán)[J];廣東技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

4 歐陽(yáng)慧,王迪,楊玉潔;聽(tīng)證制度執(zhí)法淺析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2003年04期

5 李昕,汪洋;論民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的可行性[J];前沿;2005年01期

6 王金利;執(zhí)行工作的新方式——執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證[J];人大研究;2002年10期

7 蔣鋒;執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2000年05期

8 劉道義,王付令;淺談聽(tīng)證執(zhí)行[J];人民司法;2000年11期

9 胡家強(qiáng);樸振吾;李鵬飛;;民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證問(wèn)題初探[J];山東商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

10 李峰;聽(tīng)證在刑事訴訟中運(yùn)用的新思考[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 宋志剛;我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序之構(gòu)建[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

2 許瓏申;我國(guó)法院執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序探析[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

3 汪青松;民事執(zhí)行聽(tīng)證程序探討[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2414918