【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中,司法獨(dú)立和新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督都各自發(fā)揮著重要的作用,是民主社會(huì)中均不可偏廢的兩種價(jià)值。其中司法獨(dú)立在維護(hù)人權(quán)、保障正義、維持司法公信力上發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用,同樣,新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督對(duì)于新聞自由以及公民的知情權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)也扮演著舉足輕重的角色。而司法獨(dú)立與新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督之間的關(guān)系也恰是憲政領(lǐng)域中最為敏感的領(lǐng)域之一,加上二者關(guān)系在理論上存在的困惑和現(xiàn)實(shí)當(dāng)中沖突的不斷呈現(xiàn),使得這一問(wèn)題日益成為學(xué)界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。因此,如何構(gòu)筑二者之間的關(guān)系,從而理性地指導(dǎo)現(xiàn)實(shí)機(jī)制的運(yùn)作,成為當(dāng)前亟待研究與解決的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。同時(shí),筆者也發(fā)現(xiàn),在論證新聞媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的沖突時(shí),有關(guān)的論著更多的是抽象的談?wù)摱叩南嗷リP(guān)系,而對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)中媒體與司法關(guān)系的現(xiàn)狀缺乏全面的考察。同時(shí)關(guān)于解決這一問(wèn)題的措施和建議也過(guò)于籠統(tǒng),細(xì)化程度不夠。而隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體的興起,這一問(wèn)題卻變得更加復(fù)雜,因此,繼續(xù)深入地探討這一問(wèn)題,仍然具有很大的學(xué)理意義和實(shí)踐價(jià)值。 針對(duì)這一問(wèn)題,筆者主張深入并多角度的分析二者之間沖突的原因,同時(shí)要正視二者之間完全具有良性互動(dòng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)和理論基礎(chǔ)。在如何構(gòu)建二者之間平衡的問(wèn)題上,筆者認(rèn)為,要正確對(duì)待立法缺失這一問(wèn)題以及立法的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,主張應(yīng)先對(duì)立法困境拿出解決方案進(jìn)而提出完善立法的建議。同時(shí),需從司法和新聞媒體兩方面均進(jìn)行改革從而達(dá)到兩者之間的平衡和良性互動(dòng)。 本文的論述結(jié)構(gòu)如下： 第一部分主要介紹了司法獨(dú)立與新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督權(quán)的相關(guān)基本理論,包括司法獨(dú)立的價(jià)值分析、新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督的價(jià)值和功能的相關(guān)闡述； 第二部分主要是著眼于司法獨(dú)立與新聞媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)之間關(guān)系的解析。主要包括對(duì)二者之間契合點(diǎn)的分析,以闡明二者有良性互動(dòng)的基礎(chǔ),以及二者在現(xiàn)實(shí)中所存在的沖突狀態(tài)以及存在沖突的原因,為理性地處理二者之間的關(guān)系找準(zhǔn)對(duì)策的入口。 第三部分主要介紹其他國(guó)家相應(yīng)的制度與經(jīng)驗(yàn),其中包括歐美法系、大陸法系典型的制度以及相關(guān)的國(guó)際規(guī)則,為我國(guó)理性地構(gòu)建二者關(guān)系提供重要啟示和借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第四部分主要提出了如何構(gòu)建二者之間的平衡的措施體系,分別從完善立法的角度、司法獨(dú)立角度,新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督角度系統(tǒng)論述筆者的思考和建議。最后提出相關(guān)的余論。
[Abstract]:In modern society, judicial independence and media supervision play an important role, which are two values that can not be neglected in democratic society. Judicial independence plays an irreplaceable role in safeguarding human rights, safeguarding justice and maintaining judicial credibility. Similarly, media supervision plays an important role in the realization of press freedom and citizens' right to know. The relationship between judicial independence and media supervision is also one of the most sensitive areas in the field of constitutionalism, plus the confusion in theory and the continuous emergence of conflicts in reality. Make this issue increasingly become the focus of academic attention. Therefore, how to construct the relationship between the two, so as to guide the operation of practical mechanism rationally, has become a theoretical and practical problem to be urgently studied and solved. At the same time, the author also found that, when demonstrating the conflict between the supervision of the news media and the independence of the judiciary, the related works are more abstract about the relationship between the two, but lack of a comprehensive investigation of the current situation of the relationship between the media and the judiciary in reality. At the same time, the measures and suggestions to solve this problem are too general, the degree of refinement is not enough. However, with the rise of network media, this problem has become more complicated. Therefore, it is still of great theoretical significance and practical value to continue to explore this problem in depth. In view of this problem, the author advocates to analyze the causes of the conflict between the two from many angles, and to face up to the fact that there is a positive interaction between them both in reality and in theory. On the question of how to construct the balance between the two, the author thinks that in order to correctly deal with the problem of lack of legislation and the realistic dilemma of legislation, we should first put forward a solution to the dilemma of legislation and then put forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation. At the same time, both judicial and news media should be reformed in order to achieve a balance and positive interaction between the two. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first part mainly introduces the basic theories of judicial independence and media supervision power, including the value analysis of judicial independence, the value and function of news media supervision; The second part mainly focuses on the analysis of the relationship between judicial independence and news media supervision power. It mainly includes the analysis of the joint point between the two, in order to clarify the basis of their benign interaction, as well as the conflict state and the cause of the conflict in reality, and to find the entrance of the countermeasures to deal with the relationship between the two rationally. The third part mainly introduces the corresponding systems and experiences of other countries, including the European and American legal system, the typical system of the continental law system and the relevant international rules, which provides important enlightenment and reference experience for our country to construct the relationship between the two rationally. The fourth part mainly put forward how to build a balanced system of measures between the two, respectively from the perspective of improving legislation, judicial independence, news media supervision of public opinion point of view to systematically discuss the author's thoughts and suggestions. Finally, the author puts forward the relevant conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926;G210

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李露雅;;論新聞媒體與我國(guó)的法制建設(shè)[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2012年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：2413559