【摘要】：“法者所以興功懼暴也,律者所以定分止?fàn)幰?令者所以令人知事也”①。司法所追求的原始目的是“定紛止?fàn)帯?即使是在現(xiàn)代法治社會(huì),司法的目的也無(wú)外乎于此。因此,如何才能使司法達(dá)到“定紛止?fàn)帯敝?眾所周知,所謂司法,即通過(guò)法官給出判決以重新界定當(dāng)事人之間權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系的過(guò)程。從上述關(guān)于司法概念的界定可知,在司法過(guò)程中判決的作出者——法官,毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)地起著舉足輕重的作用,他們的不同舉動(dòng)將導(dǎo)致司法效果的迥異。同時(shí),多年的實(shí)踐也告訴我們,欲使司法達(dá)到“定紛止?fàn)帯敝?法官責(zé)任重大。所以,在訴訟中,法官應(yīng)該正確履行自己的職責(zé),嚴(yán)格依法辦事,確保判決結(jié)果的公平公正,以實(shí)現(xiàn)司法的初衷。然而,僅有依法辦事,公平公正地判決結(jié)果就能實(shí)現(xiàn)“定紛止?fàn)帯眴?我國(guó)現(xiàn)今大量涌現(xiàn)的上訴上訪現(xiàn)象告訴我們：要真正實(shí)現(xiàn)司法“定紛止?fàn)帯敝踔?法官僅能確保判決結(jié)果公平公正是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的,還須保證結(jié)果合理易懂,即法官判決應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)說(shuō)理,以更好地向公眾公開(kāi)判決所得結(jié)果之依據(jù)、理由等。法官如能詳細(xì)地解釋其所作判決之事實(shí)與理由,動(dòng)之以情曉之以理,不僅具有普及法律的作用,還能促使當(dāng)事人認(rèn)同判決,最終使法律被遵守,糾紛得以化解。因此,可以說(shuō)判決“合理易懂”和“公平公正”一樣重要,都是保證司法效果實(shí)現(xiàn)的重要手段。 筆者正是基于對(duì)法官說(shuō)理之重要性的充分認(rèn)識(shí),才做此選題,希望通過(guò)本文以引起更多法官對(duì)于說(shuō)理的重視,也為法官今后該如何說(shuō)理提供一點(diǎn)建議。全文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分主要講述法官說(shuō)理的一般理論原理,包括法官說(shuō)理的概念和價(jià)值。法官說(shuō)理,顧名思義就是指法官在做出裁判時(shí)必須給出裁判理由。法官說(shuō)理具有多方面的價(jià)值,不僅能夠促進(jìn)實(shí)體正義,也能促進(jìn)程序正義,除此在外,在節(jié)約司法資源和增強(qiáng)法律的公信力等方面也存在很大價(jià)值。 第二部分的主要內(nèi)容是法官說(shuō)理的域外法比較。本文從大陸法系和英美法系法官的說(shuō)理風(fēng)格和形成原因入手,對(duì)兩大法系的法官說(shuō)理進(jìn)行了比較,在此基礎(chǔ)上國(guó)外法官說(shuō)理對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。 第三部分主要闡述了我國(guó)法官說(shuō)理存在的主要問(wèn)題及其原因。法官說(shuō)理存在的問(wèn)題主要集中在事實(shí)認(rèn)定、法律適用和合理判決的做出上。這些問(wèn)題是多方面因素共同作用的結(jié)果,既有傳統(tǒng)因素的影響,也有法官自身的原因。 第四部分提出了完善我國(guó)法官說(shuō)理的對(duì)策。本文針對(duì)我國(guó)法官說(shuō)理存在的問(wèn)題,提出從推進(jìn)裁判文書(shū)改革,強(qiáng)化律師對(duì)法官說(shuō)理的推動(dòng),加強(qiáng)法官的職業(yè)道德建設(shè)等多方面措施來(lái)促進(jìn)法官說(shuō)理。
[Abstract]:"the Dharma is so glad to fear violence, the law is so determined to stop the dispute, so that the governor so also." 1. The original aim of judicature is to settle disputes, even in modern society of ruling by law, the aim of judicature is nothing more than this. Therefore, how can we achieve the effect of "settling disputes and ending disputes" in the administration of justice? As is known to all, justice is the process of redefining the relationship between rights and obligations by a judge. From the above definition of judicial concept, it can be seen that the judge, plays an important role in the judicial process, and their different actions will lead to different judicial effects. At the same time, the practice for many years also tells us that judges have a heavy responsibility to achieve the effect of "settling disputes". Therefore, in the lawsuit, the judge should carry out his duty correctly, handle affairs strictly according to law, ensure the justice of the judgment result, in order to realize the original intention of the judicature. However, only according to law, a fair and just judgment results can achieve "settle disputes"? The phenomenon of appeal petition in large numbers in our country tells us that in order to realize the original intention of judicial "settling disputes", it is far from enough for the judge to ensure the fairness and fairness of the judgment result, and also to ensure that the result is reasonable and easy to understand. That is to say, the judge's decision should strengthen reasoning to better disclose the basis and reason of the result to the public. If the judge can explain the facts and reasons of his judgment in detail and persevere with the feeling, it will not only popularize the law, but also urge the parties to identify with the judgment, finally make the law be obeyed and the dispute resolved. Therefore, it can be said that judgment is as important as fairness and justice, and it is an important means to guarantee the realization of judicial effect. It is based on the full understanding of the importance of the judge reasoning, I do this topic, hope to attract more judges to the importance of reasoning through this article, but also for judges to provide some advice on how to reason in the future. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly describes the general theory of judge reasoning, including the concept and value of judge reasoning. Judge reason, as the name implies, means that the judge in the decision must give the reasons for the decision. Judge reasoning has many values, not only to promote substantive justice, but also to promote procedural justice, in addition to this, there is great value in saving judicial resources and enhancing the public credibility of the law. The second part of the main content is the comparison of the extraterritorial law of the judge reasoning. This article starts with the judge's reasoning style and forming reason of the civil law system and the common law system, and compares the judge reasoning of the two major legal systems, on the basis of which, the enlightenment of the foreign judge reasoning to our country is given. The third part mainly expounds the main problems and reasons of our country judge reasoning. The problems of judge reasoning mainly focus on the fact-finding, the application of law and the making of reasonable judgment. These problems are the result of many factors, both traditional factors and judges themselves. The fourth part puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the reasoning of judges in our country. Aiming at the problems existing in the reasoning of judges in China, this paper puts forward many measures to promote the reasoning of judges, such as promoting the reform of adjudicative documents, strengthening the promotion of lawyers to the reasoning of judges, strengthening the construction of judges' professional ethics, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙斌;劉彬;;試論如何平衡實(shí)體正義和程序正義[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年22期

2 黃新民;;人性化與我國(guó)刑事訴訟法的完善[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

3 公丕祥;;當(dāng)代中國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的意義分析[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

4 蘇力;判決書(shū)的背后[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年03期

5 王愛(ài)軍;;法治理念與形式正義[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2011年02期

6 方工;馮英菊;;釋法說(shuō)理:檢察法律文書(shū)的改進(jìn)與規(guī)范[J];人民檢察;2007年12期

7 劉喬發(fā);;論民事判決說(shuō)理的原則及方法[J];人民司法;2008年13期

8 丁萬(wàn)星;;法的精神簡(jiǎn)論[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2005年04期

9 白茫茫;;程序法的價(jià)值取向及現(xiàn)代理念[J];海南人大;2006年11期

10 范鐵驪;;從司法權(quán)說(shuō)開(kāi)去——淺談我國(guó)的法官獨(dú)立問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)商界(下半月);2008年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 秦宗文;[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 殷律律;關(guān)于加強(qiáng)海關(guān)職業(yè)道德建設(shè)的幾點(diǎn)思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2410932