檢察機(jī)關(guān)主管公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)之構(gòu)想
[Abstract]:The property declaration system for civil servants has been in place in developed countries such as Britain, the United States, Germany, France, and Japan for many years, and has played an important role in promoting the integrity and efficiency of the government. As a result, they have chosen the civil servants' property declaration authorities. He has accumulated rich experience. However, the current civil servant property declaration system in China is still in the stage of theoretical and practical exploration, and there is a lack of systematic and thorough analysis and demonstration on the key proposition of who should be in charge. This paper adopts the theoretical research method, the comparative research method, the literature research method, the investigation research method and so on, carries on the logical analysis and the normative analysis through the prior possession rich perceptual data foundation, A new point of view is put forward in the theoretical and practical circles, that is, the establishment of the civil servant property declaration system in charge of the procuratorial organ, which will add a path choice for the future construction of the civil servant property declaration system with Chinese characteristics. It is precisely with this as the starting point, this article first from the present our country present some theories dispute and the practice exploration which related to the civil servant property declaration authority to carve out, one by one analyzes its flaw. Then it demonstrates the superiority of procuratorial organ in charge of civil servant property declaration. Finally, from the aspects of political status, value orientation, institution selection, authority setting, concrete content, supervision and implementation, legal responsibility, system and so on, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the procuratorial organ in charge of civil servant property declaration system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:D922.11
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙秉志;彭新林;;我國當(dāng)前懲治高官腐敗犯罪的法理思考[J];東方法學(xué);2012年02期
2 謝佑平;宋遠(yuǎn)升;;檢察監(jiān)督與政府權(quán)力[J];河北法學(xué);2009年05期
3 周杏梅;;公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)之立法思考[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期
4 孫國祥;;財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度建構(gòu)中的相關(guān)問題芻議[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年02期
5 蔣云根;;國外財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)的制度化建設(shè)與啟示[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2010年15期
6 葉貴炎;;論公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度[J];理論界;2006年11期
7 都玉霞;;構(gòu)建我國預(yù)防腐敗體系——以制定《公務(wù)人員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)法》為視角[J];理論學(xué)刊;2009年08期
8 王英;;法國公務(wù)員財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度[J];刊授黨校;2010年06期
9 周理松;論檢察監(jiān)督的程序性與實(shí)效性[J];人民檢察;2001年06期
10 閻寶龍;國外財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)制度對(duì)我國財(cái)產(chǎn)申報(bào)法的借鑒意義[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年01期
,本文編號(hào):2398715
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2398715.html