【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會,知識結(jié)構(gòu)越來越趨于專業(yè)化,進(jìn)入任何一個專業(yè)領(lǐng)域都需要掌握特有的知識和技能�；谧约旱闹R、能力的有限性及專業(yè)化分工的密切性,人們在處理事務(wù)時對專家的信賴和期望值提高,專家濫用信賴的可能性加大,隨之專家責(zé)任產(chǎn)生了。律師專家民事責(zé)任是專家民事責(zé)任的一種表現(xiàn),我國目前已基本具備了律師專家責(zé)任制度的雛形,但相關(guān)規(guī)定仍存在著一定的缺陷:立法規(guī)定的不一致,部分問題尚未明確界定,相關(guān)的一般理論未能得到充分徹底地闡述和論證,實踐中出現(xiàn)不少問題。委托人或第三人的利益保護(hù)問題在當(dāng)下信息不對稱的背景下顯得尤為突出,各國通過各種形式對其損害予以救濟(jì),取得了很不錯的成效,值得我國借鑒。特別是對風(fēng)險加以限制和轉(zhuǎn)移的做法,從而既保護(hù)了當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益,又維系了律師的執(zhí)業(yè)熱情,促進(jìn)律師行業(yè)的整體發(fā)展,達(dá)到各方利益的最佳狀態(tài)。本文借鑒兩大法系的立法司法經(jīng)驗和相關(guān)的基本理論,立足于前輩的研究成果,對這一問題作更為細(xì)致的研究和分析,以期待對我國律師專家民事責(zé)任制度的建立和完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In modern society, knowledge structure is becoming more and more specialized. Based on their own knowledge, limited ability and the close specialization of division of labor, the trust and expectation of experts in dealing with affairs have been improved, the possibility of abuse of trust by experts has been increased, and the responsibility of experts has come into being. The civil liability of lawyer expert is a kind of manifestation of expert civil liability. At present, our country has basically possessed the rudiments of lawyer expert liability system, but there are still some defects in the relevant provisions: the legislative provisions are inconsistent. Some problems have not been clearly defined, the related general theory has not been fully and thoroughly expounded and demonstrated, and there are many problems in practice. The protection of the interests of the principal or the third party is particularly prominent under the background of the information asymmetry at present. Various countries have made good results to remedy the damage through various forms, which is worthy of our country to learn from. Especially, the practice of limiting and transferring risks not only protects the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, but also maintains the lawyer's practice enthusiasm, promotes the overall development of the lawyer industry, and achieves the best state of the interests of all parties. This paper draws lessons from the legislative and judicial experience of the two legal systems and relevant basic theories, based on the research results of the predecessors, and makes a more detailed study and analysis of this issue. It is beneficial to the establishment and perfection of the civil liability system of lawyers and experts in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923;D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姚鋒;律師專家責(zé)任研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2252882