【摘要】：因陪審制度具有保障司法民主與司法公正等價(jià)值,故無論是英美法系還是大陸法系國家,均在司法制度中確立了此項(xiàng)制度。在我國,人民陪審員制度是法律規(guī)定的一項(xiàng)基本審判制度,也是一條重要的法律原則。人民陪審員制度是民主政治的表現(xiàn)形式,對(duì)于防止司法腐敗、促進(jìn)尊重人權(quán)、弘揚(yáng)法律意識(shí),都起著不可替代的作用。但由于種種因素,我國的人民陪審員制度在立法層面與實(shí)施層面不可避免的存在著一些缺陷和問題,有待加以完善和解決。本文首先運(yùn)用規(guī)范分析的方法,在對(duì)陪審制度的法律價(jià)值和社會(huì)功能進(jìn)行理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,采用實(shí)證分析方法,通過列舉、歸納和比較,重點(diǎn)指出我國人民陪審員制度在立法方面和實(shí)施方面存在的問題,并從立法層面與司法實(shí)務(wù)層面一一提出自己的建議。在立法上,建議在憲法中確立陪審員制度,修改三大訴訟法、人民法院組織法、《關(guān)于完善人民陪審員制度的決定》(以下簡稱為《決定》),制定《人民陪審員法》,建立健全對(duì)陪審員的監(jiān)督相關(guān)立法,確立“人民陪審團(tuán)”制度等立法完善措施,使人民陪審員制度獲得強(qiáng)而有力的立法支撐和保障；在司法實(shí)踐方面,通過提高人民陪審員的綜合素質(zhì),完善選用人民陪審員機(jī)制,優(yōu)化人民陪審員的經(jīng)費(fèi)保障機(jī)制,建立健全對(duì)陪審員的管理機(jī)制并加強(qiáng)對(duì)人民陪審員的培訓(xùn)教育等措施,確保人民陪審員制度實(shí)施到位,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)其應(yīng)有的社會(huì)功能與法律價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Because the jury system has the value of safeguarding judicial democracy and judicial justice, both Anglo-American and continental law countries have established this system in the judicial system. In our country, the people's jury system is a basic trial system stipulated by law and an important legal principle. The people's jury system is the manifestation of democratic politics, which plays an irreplaceable role in preventing judicial corruption, promoting respect for human rights and promoting legal consciousness. However, due to various factors, the people's jury system in our country in the legislative level and the implementation of the inevitable existence of some defects and problems, to be improved and resolved. Based on the theoretical research on the legal value and social function of the jury system, this paper first uses the normative analysis method to analyze the legal value and the social function of the jury system, through enumerating, summarizing and comparing the legal value and the social function of the jury system. This paper mainly points out the problems existing in the legislation and implementation of the people's jury system in China, and puts forward its own suggestions from the legislative level and the judicial practice level. In terms of legislation, it is proposed to establish the juror system in the Constitution and to amend the three major procedural laws. The Organic Law of the people's Court, the decision on the perfection of the people's jury system (hereinafter referred to as the decision), the formulation of the people's jury Law, the establishment and improvement of relevant legislation on the supervision of jurors, and the establishment of the system of "people's jury", etc. In judicial practice, we should improve the comprehensive quality of the people's jurors, improve the mechanism for selecting people's jurors, and optimize the funding guarantee mechanism for the people's jurors. To establish and improve the management mechanism of jurors and strengthen the training and education of people's jurors, to ensure the implementation of the people's jury system in place, and finally to achieve its due social function and legal value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 萬志昂;李艷;;當(dāng)前中國陪審制度的現(xiàn)狀及完善對(duì)策[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年S1期

2 何家弘;;陪審制度縱橫論[J];法學(xué)家;1999年03期

3 肖揚(yáng);;當(dāng)代法律制度[J];法學(xué)家;1999年06期

4 左衛(wèi)民，周云帆;國外陪審制的比較與評(píng)析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年03期

5 劉藝工,李擁軍;關(guān)于人民陪審制度難以執(zhí)行根源的探討[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

6 葉青;關(guān)于人民陪審員制度價(jià)值的思考[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

7 王敏遠(yuǎn);中國陪審制度及其完善[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年04期

8 蔣惠嶺;論陪審制度的改革[J];人民司法;1995年06期

9 程雷;人民陪審制度的現(xiàn)狀及思考[J];人民司法;1997年05期

10 劉校濱;中美陪審制度比較研究[J];吉林師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 洪更強(qiáng);[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

2 嚴(yán)文淵 顧宏斐;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2241475