【摘要】：能動(dòng)司法在轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的中國(guó)當(dāng)代社會(huì)有著特殊的存在意義。自從現(xiàn)代法治理念傳播以來，規(guī)則主義至上以及嚴(yán)守法律形式主義就是現(xiàn)代國(guó)家在司法中被普遍接受和運(yùn)用的主張。但是，隨著社會(huì)生產(chǎn)方式的迅速變化和發(fā)展，各種新型的疑難案件越來越多，導(dǎo)致不加分析地嚴(yán)守司法規(guī)則主義，可能對(duì)一些疑難復(fù)雜案件而言，反倒不能更好地解決。我國(guó)正處在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期，社會(huì)的變革使得社會(huì)關(guān)系日趨復(fù)雜，價(jià)值判斷日益多元化，另外全球金融危機(jī)對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重的影響，形成了各種利益糾紛。此時(shí)能動(dòng)司法措施的出臺(tái)在一定程度上有效化解了各種司法難題。但是，在長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)的法治建設(shè)過程中，能否把能動(dòng)司法作為我國(guó)司法發(fā)展的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)路徑？我國(guó)法治的建設(shè)到底需要繼續(xù)司法職業(yè)化發(fā)展還是需要轉(zhuǎn)向能動(dòng)司法的路徑？這個(gè)問題引起了學(xué)術(shù)界激烈的討論，這也是本文的問題來源。 本文總共分為五個(gè)部分，第一部分引言中著重對(duì)本文問題緣起做了介紹。在問題緣起部分，厘清了我國(guó)司法改革發(fā)展的前一階段即司法職業(yè)化的發(fā)展所存在的問題，為能動(dòng)司法的出現(xiàn)做一個(gè)背景鋪墊，接而討論司法改革的另一措施即能動(dòng)司法，，把本文著重討論的關(guān)鍵詞做簡(jiǎn)要介紹。 第二部分是文章正文的第一部分。主要對(duì)中國(guó)語境下的能動(dòng)司法進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)述。首先區(qū)分了能動(dòng)司法與司法能動(dòng)主義之間的關(guān)系，然后分析能動(dòng)司法出現(xiàn)的背景因素,最后再對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行細(xì)致地論述。 第三部分主要討論能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)踐及其效果。先把全國(guó)各地有代表性的做法進(jìn)行細(xì)致的介紹，然后再根據(jù)具體的實(shí)踐效果分析出能動(dòng)司法的合理性因素。 第四部分著重分析能動(dòng)司法所存在的問題。主要是如何處理好能動(dòng)司法與司法職業(yè)化之間的關(guān)系，本文討論了在當(dāng)今的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)下，應(yīng)該以解決當(dāng)下司法發(fā)展過程中出現(xiàn)的問題為首要考慮，然后再?gòu)拈L(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)的法治建設(shè)角度著想，應(yīng)該著力發(fā)展司法職業(yè)化道路。 第五部分是文章的結(jié)語。對(duì)我國(guó)能動(dòng)司法存在的問題分析完以后，本部分開始探析能動(dòng)司法的出路，即能動(dòng)司法對(duì)我國(guó)司法改革走向的啟示。在我國(guó)司法改革的過程中，就是在不斷地自我修正中趨近于更加合理化的路徑。
[Abstract]:The active judicature has special existence significance in the Chinese contemporary society in the transitional period. Since the spread of the concept of modern rule of law, the supremacy of rule of law and strict observance of legal formalism are the general acceptance and application of modern countries in the administration of justice. However, with the rapid change and development of the social production mode, more and more new types of difficult cases, leading to strict adherence to judicial rules without analysis, may not be able to better solve some difficult and complex cases. Our country is in the social transition period, the social transformation makes the social relationship increasingly complex, the value judgment is increasingly diversified, in addition, the global financial crisis has had the serious influence to our country economy development, has formed various kinds of benefit disputes. At this time, the introduction of active judicial measures to a certain extent effectively resolved a variety of judicial problems. However, in the long-term construction of the rule of law, can we take active justice as the long-term path of judicial development in our country? Does the construction of the rule of law in our country need to continue the development of judicial professionalization or to turn to the path of active justice? This problem has aroused heated discussion in academic circles, which is also the source of the problem in this paper. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part of the introduction focuses on the origin of this problem. In the part of the origin of the problem, it clarifies the problems existing in the development of judicial professionalization in the previous stage of the development of judicial reform in our country, and provides a background for the emergence of active judicature, and then discusses another measure of judicial reform, that is, the active judicature. The key words discussed in this paper are briefly introduced. The second part is the first part of the text. This paper mainly introduces the active judicature in the context of China. This paper first distinguishes the relationship between active judicature and judicial activism, then analyzes the background factors of active judicature, and then discusses the connotation of active judicature in detail. The third part mainly discusses the practice and effect of active justice. Firstly, it introduces the representative practices in various parts of the country, and then analyzes the rational factors of active judicature according to the concrete practical effect. The fourth part focuses on the analysis of the problems existing in active justice. How to deal with the relationship between active judicature and judicial professionalization is discussed in this paper. In the present social reality, the first consideration should be to solve the problems in the course of judicial development. Then from the perspective of long-term construction of the rule of law, we should focus on developing the road of judicial professionalization. The fifth part is the conclusion of the article. After analyzing the existing problems of active judicature in our country, this part begins to analyze the outlet of active judicature, that is, the enlightenment of active judicature to the trend of judicial reform in our country. In the process of judicial reform in our country, it is in the process of self-revision to get closer to a more rational path.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳勝?gòu)?qiáng);;論能動(dòng)司法的本土資源[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2011年01期

2 羅東川;丁廣宇;;論能動(dòng)司法應(yīng)處理好的幾個(gè)關(guān)系[J];法律適用;2010年10期

3 夏錦文;;當(dāng)下能動(dòng)司法亟待處理的六大關(guān)系及解決思路[J];法律適用;2010年10期

4 蘇力;;關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

5 顧培東;;司法能動(dòng)主義的蘊(yùn)含[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

6 羅東川;丁廣宇;;我國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的理論與實(shí)踐評(píng)述[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

7 王建國(guó);;司法能動(dòng)與糾紛解決[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

8 章武生;;論我國(guó)大調(diào)解機(jī)制的構(gòu)建——兼析大調(diào)解與ADR的關(guān)系[J];法商研究;2007年06期

9 方樂;;能動(dòng)司法的模式與方法[J];法學(xué);2011年01期

10 邱飛;通過法律職業(yè)化進(jìn)路的司法改革[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年02期

本文編號(hào)：2241055