【摘要】： 本文通過對陪審理念的滲透，試圖洞悉陪審的價值所在；通過比較陪審團制和參審制的優(yōu)劣之所在，試圖尋找我國陪審制度的構(gòu)建定位。在論證陪審團制更能實現(xiàn)陪審的基本價值后，提出在我國建構(gòu)陪審團制，并對其可行性進行了論證。然后在參考國外較為成熟的陪審團制的運作后，建構(gòu)了我國的陪審團制并闡述了陪審團制對于我國司法改革的促進作用。 本論文的基本觀點如下： 1．陪審團制較參審制能更大程度實現(xiàn)陪審的基本價值——司法民主、維護司法公正； 2．我國應(yīng)保留陪審制，但宜以陪審團制取代人民陪審員制； 3．在建構(gòu)我國的陪審團制時，應(yīng)結(jié)合我國實際情況而為之。 本論文共分五章，簡要內(nèi)容如下： 第一章．引論——陪審制之概念及價值。本章從“陪審”的詞義及陪審制的運作機制來闡述陪審制概念。認為陪審制就是非法官人員或由其組成的團體和法官一起沒有分工或有所分工地審理案件以實現(xiàn)司法民主、維護司法公正的法律制度。同時指出，陪審的價值在于保障司法民主，維護司法公正。 第二章．西方陪審制度。本章通過探尋西方陪審制的緣起、西方主要國家陪審制的現(xiàn)狀，對西方國家中陪審制的兩大表現(xiàn)形式——陪審團制和參審制進行分析比較，提出陪審團制優(yōu)于參審制的觀點。 第三章．我國陪審制度。本章追溯我國陪審制的發(fā)生、發(fā)展，洞察我國人民陪審員制的現(xiàn)狀，提出應(yīng)對我國現(xiàn)有陪審制進行改革。在對上一章分析比較的基礎(chǔ)上，主張廢除人民陪審員制，建構(gòu)陪審團制，，并對其可行性進行了分析。 第四章．我國陪審團制度之建構(gòu)。在參照國外陪審團制運作的基礎(chǔ)上，本章建構(gòu)了我國的陪審團制。認為陪審團制的內(nèi)容主要包括：1)．陪審團制 應(yīng)入憲，并規(guī)定民眾有權(quán)選擇是否接受陪審團的審判；2)．陪審員的資格確 認。資格確認既要體現(xiàn)陪審員的廣泛性，又要保證陪審員的可陪審能力；3)． 審判程序中的陪審團。首先選任陪審員組成陪審團，當(dāng)事人選任陪審員享 有有理由和無理由要求候選陪審員回避，當(dāng)事人無理由回避要求權(quán)的行使 次數(shù)有限制。陪審團在封閉場所秘密裁判案件，對刑事案件的裁判，陪審 團應(yīng)一致通過，對民事案件的裁判，可多數(shù)一致通過。 第五章．陪審團制度與我國司法改革。本章根據(jù)陪審團審判的運作機 制，論證了陪審團制的建立將促進我國訴訟模式、證據(jù)制度、法官制度、 審判組織、審判獨立、司法公丌等方面的改革。
[Abstract]:This paper tries to understand the value of jury system through the penetration of jury concept, and tries to find the orientation of the construction of jury system in our country by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of jury system and jury system. After demonstrating that jury system can realize the basic value of jury system, this paper puts forward the construction of jury system in our country, and proves its feasibility. Then, after referring to the operation of the jury system abroad, the author constructs the jury system in our country and expounds the role of the jury system in promoting the judicial reform in our country. The basic viewpoints of this thesis are as follows: 1. The jury system can realize the basic value of jury to a greater extent than the system of participation in trial-judicial democracy and maintain judicial justice; 2.The jury system should be retained in our country, but the jury system should replace the people's jury system; 3. In constructing the jury system in China, we should combine it with the actual situation of our country. This thesis is divided into five chapters. The contents are as follows: chapter one: introduction-the concept and value of jury system. This chapter expounds the concept of jury system from the meaning of jury and the operating mechanism of jury system. It is believed that the jury system is a legal system in which non-judges or groups formed by them have no division of labor or division of labor to try cases in order to realize judicial democracy and maintain judicial justice. At the same time, it points out that the value of jury lies in safeguarding judicial democracy and safeguarding judicial justice. Chapter two: Western jury system. By exploring the origin of the western jury system and the present situation of the jury system in the main western countries, this chapter analyzes and compares the two main forms of jury system in the western countries-jury system and the joint-trial system, and puts forward the viewpoint that the jury system is superior to the joint-trial system. Chapter III. Jury system in China. This chapter traces the occurrence and development of the jury system in China, insight into the present situation of the people's jury system in our country, and puts forward that we should reform the present jury system in our country. On the basis of the analysis and comparison of the previous chapter, the author advocates the abolition of the people's jury system and the construction of the jury system, and analyzes its feasibility. Chapter four: the construction of jury system in China. On the basis of reference to the operation of foreign jury system, this chapter constructs the jury system in our country. Holding that the contents of the jury system mainly include: 1). The jury system should be included in the Constitution. It also stipulates that the public shall have the right to choose whether to stand trial by jury. Qualification confirmation should not only embody the universality of jurors, but also guarantee jurors' assessable ability. First of all, jurors are selected to form a jury, and the parties who select jurors have reason and no reason to ask candidates to withdraw from the jury. There are limits on the number of times the parties may exercise their right to challenge without reason. In the closed place, the jury shall pass the judgment of the criminal case by consensus, and the judgment of the civil case by the majority. Chapter five: jury system and Judicial Reform in China. According to the operating machine system of jury trial, this chapter demonstrates that the establishment of jury system will promote the litigation mode and evidence system in our country. The reform of the system of judges, the organization of trial, the independence of the trial and the administration of justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號】：D916

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭光東;陪審團的歷史與價值[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳斯;人民陪審制度的困境與出路[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 徐越峰;論我國人民陪審員制度的重構(gòu)[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

本文編號：2191279