能動(dòng)司法的反思研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-04 09:34
【摘要】：近年，最高人民法院院長(zhǎng)王勝俊在調(diào)研時(shí)多次強(qiáng)調(diào)，各級(jí)法院要充分認(rèn)識(shí)當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的新形勢(shì)，發(fā)揮審判職能，強(qiáng)化能動(dòng)司法。江蘇省高級(jí)人民法院院長(zhǎng)公丕祥也曾說，“當(dāng)代中國(guó)司法必須走司法能動(dòng)之路”。對(duì)此，各路媒體紛紛大肆宣傳，，高調(diào)贊揚(yáng)；不少學(xué)者也積極響應(yīng)，發(fā)表相關(guān)文章論述能動(dòng)司法的積極意義。 無可否認(rèn)，能動(dòng)司法確有其積極方面的意義，但在中國(guó)當(dāng)今的司法大環(huán)境中，是否適合高調(diào)適用能動(dòng)司法以及把能動(dòng)司法作為司法理念仍需要我們冷靜思考。我國(guó)有著悠久的人治歷史，幾千年的封建社會(huì)，我們一直處于皇權(quán)的獨(dú)裁統(tǒng)治之下。直到1949年，我國(guó)才真正擺脫人治的歷史，但從建國(guó)以來一直到文革，我國(guó)人們的法律意識(shí)非常淡薄，文革以后，我們才有真正的法律意識(shí)。1982年，中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨率先垂范，在通過的新黨章中規(guī)定：“黨必須在憲法和法律的范圍內(nèi)活動(dòng)。”在這一年，此精神寫入憲法，直到1999年，“依法治國(guó)”理念才寫入我國(guó)憲法。對(duì)于大多數(shù)百姓而言，法律意識(shí)和法治理念不過剛剛起步，現(xiàn)在我們又開始談能動(dòng)司法確實(shí)為時(shí)過早。因此我們有必要對(duì)能動(dòng)司法進(jìn)行反思，通過分析能動(dòng)司法的理論困境和現(xiàn)實(shí)困境，為能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)的適用尋找出路，真正實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)的公平和正義。 全文共分為五個(gè)部分，簡(jiǎn)述如下： 引言部分簡(jiǎn)單交代了我國(guó)能動(dòng)司法出現(xiàn)的大背景，為接下來分析能動(dòng)司法提供時(shí)代環(huán)境。 第一部分主要論述了能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵，通過對(duì)美國(guó)司法能動(dòng)主義的界定來探討中國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵。另外，調(diào)解也是能動(dòng)司法的一個(gè)主要方面，最高人民法院確定了“調(diào)解優(yōu)先，調(diào)判結(jié)合”的工作原則。 第二部分主要分析了能動(dòng)司法在我國(guó)運(yùn)行的理論困境。法治、民主和正義是司法活動(dòng)的首要目的，通過對(duì)法治、民主和正義三個(gè)方面的討論，從法理上來論證能動(dòng)司法在我國(guó)是不可行的。 第三部分主要分析了能動(dòng)司法在我國(guó)運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境。因?yàn)橹袊?guó)司法獨(dú)立尚未真正實(shí)現(xiàn)，法官整體素質(zhì)較低及司法效率亟需提高，這三個(gè)方面嚴(yán)重限制了能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)實(shí)施的效果發(fā)揮。 第四部分是對(duì)能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)運(yùn)行的一些建議和思考。盡管能動(dòng)司法不適合中國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀，但能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)施已是大勢(shì)所趨。通過對(duì)能動(dòng)司法堅(jiān)持的原則，司法克制理念的界定及能動(dòng)司法與政治關(guān)系的探討，期望能對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)施提供一些思路。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the President of the Supreme people's Court, Wang Shengjun, has repeatedly stressed that courts at all levels should fully understand the new situation of current economic and social development, give play to judicial functions, and strengthen the active administration of justice. Gong Pixiang, president of Jiangsu Provincial higher people's Court, once said, "Contemporary Chinese judicature must take the path of judicial action." In response to this, various media have hype, high praise; many scholars also responded positively, published related articles on the positive significance of active justice. There is no denying that active justice has its positive significance, but in the current judicial environment in China, it is still necessary for us to think calmly whether it is suitable to apply active justice in a high profile and to regard active justice as a judicial concept. China has a long history of rule by man, thousands of years of feudal society, we have been under the dictatorship of imperial power. It was not until 1949 that China really got rid of the history of the rule of man. But from the founding of the people to the Cultural Revolution, our people's legal consciousness was very weak. After the Cultural Revolution, we did not have a real legal consciousness. In 1982, the Communist Party of China set an example. In the new Constitution adopted, it is stated that "the Party must act within the scope of the Constitution and the law." In this year, this spirit was written into the Constitution, until 1999, the concept of "rule of law" was written into the Constitution of our country. For most people, legal awareness and the idea of the rule of law are just beginning, and it is too early to start talking about active justice. Therefore, it is necessary for us to reflect on the active judicature, to find a way out for the application of active judicature in China by analyzing the theoretical and practical predicament of the active judicature, and to realize the social fairness and justice. The full text is divided into five parts, as follows: the introduction simply explains the background of the emergence of active justice in China, and provides the time environment for the analysis of active justice. The first part mainly discusses the connotation of active judicature and probes into the connotation of Chinese active judicature through the definition of American judicial activism. In addition, mediation is also a major aspect of active justice. The Supreme people's Court has established the working principle of "mediation first, mediation combined". The second part mainly analyzes the theoretical dilemma of active justice in our country. The rule of law, democracy and justice are the primary purposes of judicial activities. Through the discussion of the three aspects of rule of law, democracy and justice, it is proved that active justice is not feasible in our country. The third part mainly analyzes the practical dilemma of active justice in our country. Because the judicial independence in China has not been really realized, the lower quality of judges and the urgent need to improve judicial efficiency, these three aspects have seriously restricted the implementation of active justice in China. The fourth part is some suggestions and thoughts on the active judicature in China. Although active justice is not suitable for the present situation in China, the implementation of active justice is the trend of the times. Based on the principle of active judicature, the definition of judicial restraint concept and the relationship between active judicature and politics, the author hopes to provide some ideas for the implementation of active judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926
本文編號(hào)：2163421
[Abstract]:In recent years, the President of the Supreme people's Court, Wang Shengjun, has repeatedly stressed that courts at all levels should fully understand the new situation of current economic and social development, give play to judicial functions, and strengthen the active administration of justice. Gong Pixiang, president of Jiangsu Provincial higher people's Court, once said, "Contemporary Chinese judicature must take the path of judicial action." In response to this, various media have hype, high praise; many scholars also responded positively, published related articles on the positive significance of active justice. There is no denying that active justice has its positive significance, but in the current judicial environment in China, it is still necessary for us to think calmly whether it is suitable to apply active justice in a high profile and to regard active justice as a judicial concept. China has a long history of rule by man, thousands of years of feudal society, we have been under the dictatorship of imperial power. It was not until 1949 that China really got rid of the history of the rule of man. But from the founding of the people to the Cultural Revolution, our people's legal consciousness was very weak. After the Cultural Revolution, we did not have a real legal consciousness. In 1982, the Communist Party of China set an example. In the new Constitution adopted, it is stated that "the Party must act within the scope of the Constitution and the law." In this year, this spirit was written into the Constitution, until 1999, the concept of "rule of law" was written into the Constitution of our country. For most people, legal awareness and the idea of the rule of law are just beginning, and it is too early to start talking about active justice. Therefore, it is necessary for us to reflect on the active judicature, to find a way out for the application of active judicature in China by analyzing the theoretical and practical predicament of the active judicature, and to realize the social fairness and justice. The full text is divided into five parts, as follows: the introduction simply explains the background of the emergence of active justice in China, and provides the time environment for the analysis of active justice. The first part mainly discusses the connotation of active judicature and probes into the connotation of Chinese active judicature through the definition of American judicial activism. In addition, mediation is also a major aspect of active justice. The Supreme people's Court has established the working principle of "mediation first, mediation combined". The second part mainly analyzes the theoretical dilemma of active justice in our country. The rule of law, democracy and justice are the primary purposes of judicial activities. Through the discussion of the three aspects of rule of law, democracy and justice, it is proved that active justice is not feasible in our country. The third part mainly analyzes the practical dilemma of active justice in our country. Because the judicial independence in China has not been really realized, the lower quality of judges and the urgent need to improve judicial efficiency, these three aspects have seriously restricted the implementation of active justice in China. The fourth part is some suggestions and thoughts on the active judicature in China. Although active justice is not suitable for the present situation in China, the implementation of active justice is the trend of the times. Based on the principle of active judicature, the definition of judicial restraint concept and the relationship between active judicature and politics, the author hopes to provide some ideas for the implementation of active judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李桂林;;司法能動(dòng)主義及其實(shí)行條件——基于美國(guó)司法能動(dòng)主義的考察[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期
2 胡君;;司法能動(dòng)的邊界[J];湖南商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
3 公丕祥;;當(dāng)代中國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的意義分析[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期
4 佟季;;2008年全國(guó)法院審理各類案件情況[J];人民司法;2009年05期
5 楊建軍;;中國(guó)能動(dòng)司法理論的憲政邏輯[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年01期
6 張榕;;司法克制下的司法能動(dòng)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年02期
7 左衛(wèi)民;;十字路口的中國(guó)司法改革:反思與前瞻[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年06期
8 陳金釗;;司法意識(shí)形態(tài):能動(dòng)與克制的反思[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年05期
9 李水明;余向陽;卓茂華;;善待能動(dòng)司法——從法社會(huì)學(xué)和法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度[J];政法學(xué)刊;2010年04期
10 蘇力;;關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法與大調(diào)解[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年01期
本文編號(hào)：2163421
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2163421.html
最近更新
教材專著
