檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-04 08:00
【摘要】：我國自改革開放以來經(jīng)濟(jì)高速發(fā)展,已經(jīng)步入小康社會,人民的生活水平有了很大程度的提高,但是社會高速發(fā)展所帶來的問題也越來越普遍,如國有資產(chǎn)流失問題,環(huán)境問題,社會公共利益問題越來越突出,受到理論界和人民群眾的普遍關(guān)注。在現(xiàn)代社會如何更好的解決上述問題將是今后工作的重中之重�？v觀國外各國慣例,這些問題都屬于檢察機(jī)關(guān)的管轄范圍,而我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)只有在民事裁判已經(jīng)發(fā)生效力以后,對于出現(xiàn)錯誤的生效裁判以審判監(jiān)督的方式提起抗訴,因而對上述問題并沒有起訴權(quán)。然而在近幾年的司法實(shí)踐中,我國某些地區(qū)的檢察機(jī)關(guān)為了維護(hù)國有資產(chǎn)利益,遏制環(huán)境污染,維護(hù)社會公共利益等確實(shí)以原告的身份提起民事訴訟并且勝訴,在結(jié)果上實(shí)現(xiàn)了實(shí)體正義。為何法律理論和法律實(shí)踐會有所沖突?主要在于法律的滯后性導(dǎo)致法律跟不上現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的速度,許多新型問題游離在法律之外。對此的解決之道就是結(jié)合我國具體國情、學(xué)習(xí)國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴的權(quán)利,一方面可以更好完善我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)的全面監(jiān)督權(quán),另一方面也可以更好的保護(hù)國家利益和社會公共利益。對此本文主要從以下角度給予論述： 第一部分,主要論述了檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度的法理基礎(chǔ),從概念和特征入手,結(jié)合學(xué)界的理論爭議分析了我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分,對國外檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度的考察,考察大陸法系、英美法系和蘇聯(lián)為代表的社會主義國家的具體制度,為我國建立檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度提供了借鑒。 第三部分,對我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度司法運(yùn)行的反思,揭示了我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)在提起民事訴訟時遇到的問題及其成因,得出的結(jié)論是我國建設(shè)該制度十分必要。 第四部分,對我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度的建構(gòu)。該部分論述了檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事起訴制度的基本原則、檢察機(jī)關(guān)的法律地位、案件范圍和幾個具體的程序性問題,如可否反訴,調(diào)解等問題。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has entered a well-off society with rapid economic development. The living standards of the people have been greatly improved, but the problems brought by the rapid development of the society are becoming more and more common, such as the loss of state-owned assets. The environmental problem, the social public interest question is more and more prominent, receives the theorists and the people's general concern. How to solve these problems better in modern society will be the most important work in the future. Throughout the practice of foreign countries, these problems all belong to the jurisdiction of the procuratorial organs, but the procuratorial organs of our country only after the civil adjudication has taken effect, to the wrong effective adjudication to the way of judicial supervision. Therefore, there is no standing for the above-mentioned issues. However, in the judicial practice in recent years, in order to safeguard the interests of state-owned assets, curb environmental pollution, safeguard the public interest and so on, procuratorial organs in some areas of our country have indeed filed civil lawsuits as plaintiffs and won the case. The entity justice is realized in the result. Why is there a conflict between legal theory and legal practice? Mainly because of the lag of law, the law can not keep pace with the development of modern economy. The solution to this problem is to study foreign advanced experience and give procuratorial organs the right to civil prosecution in the light of the specific conditions of our country. On the one hand, we can better improve the overall supervisory power of our procuratorial organs. On the other hand, it can also better protect the national interests and social public interests. This article mainly from the following angle to give the elaboration: the first part, mainly elaborated the procuratorial organ civil prosecution system legal theory foundation, from the concept and the characteristic start, This paper analyzes the theoretical basis of the civil prosecution system of procuratorial organs in China. In the second part, the investigation of the civil prosecution system of foreign procuratorial organs, the investigation of the specific systems of the socialist countries represented by the continental law system, the common law system and the Soviet Union, provides a reference for the establishment of the civil prosecution system of the procuratorial organs in our country. In the third part, the author reflects on the judicial operation of the procuratorial organ's civil prosecution system in China, and reveals the problems encountered by the procuratorial organ in bringing the civil lawsuit and its causes, and draws the conclusion that it is very necessary to build the system in our country. The fourth part, the construction of civil prosecution system of procuratorial organs in China. This part discusses the basic principles of the procuratorial organs' civil prosecution system, the legal status of the procuratorial organs, the scope of cases and several specific procedural issues, such as whether to counterclaim, mediation and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D926.3;D925.1
本文編號：2163173
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has entered a well-off society with rapid economic development. The living standards of the people have been greatly improved, but the problems brought by the rapid development of the society are becoming more and more common, such as the loss of state-owned assets. The environmental problem, the social public interest question is more and more prominent, receives the theorists and the people's general concern. How to solve these problems better in modern society will be the most important work in the future. Throughout the practice of foreign countries, these problems all belong to the jurisdiction of the procuratorial organs, but the procuratorial organs of our country only after the civil adjudication has taken effect, to the wrong effective adjudication to the way of judicial supervision. Therefore, there is no standing for the above-mentioned issues. However, in the judicial practice in recent years, in order to safeguard the interests of state-owned assets, curb environmental pollution, safeguard the public interest and so on, procuratorial organs in some areas of our country have indeed filed civil lawsuits as plaintiffs and won the case. The entity justice is realized in the result. Why is there a conflict between legal theory and legal practice? Mainly because of the lag of law, the law can not keep pace with the development of modern economy. The solution to this problem is to study foreign advanced experience and give procuratorial organs the right to civil prosecution in the light of the specific conditions of our country. On the one hand, we can better improve the overall supervisory power of our procuratorial organs. On the other hand, it can also better protect the national interests and social public interests. This article mainly from the following angle to give the elaboration: the first part, mainly elaborated the procuratorial organ civil prosecution system legal theory foundation, from the concept and the characteristic start, This paper analyzes the theoretical basis of the civil prosecution system of procuratorial organs in China. In the second part, the investigation of the civil prosecution system of foreign procuratorial organs, the investigation of the specific systems of the socialist countries represented by the continental law system, the common law system and the Soviet Union, provides a reference for the establishment of the civil prosecution system of the procuratorial organs in our country. In the third part, the author reflects on the judicial operation of the procuratorial organ's civil prosecution system in China, and reveals the problems encountered by the procuratorial organ in bringing the civil lawsuit and its causes, and draws the conclusion that it is very necessary to build the system in our country. The fourth part, the construction of civil prosecution system of procuratorial organs in China. This part discusses the basic principles of the procuratorial organs' civil prosecution system, the legal status of the procuratorial organs, the scope of cases and several specific procedural issues, such as whether to counterclaim, mediation and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D926.3;D925.1
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 夏秀淵;拉丁美洲民法典的歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
2 遲君輝;國際流失文化財(cái)產(chǎn)返還法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
3 晉入勤;企業(yè)國有產(chǎn)權(quán)交易法律制度創(chuàng)新論[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
4 李長坤;刑事涉案財(cái)物處理制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
5 趙寧;罪狀解釋論[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
6 吳一鳴;英美物權(quán)法之大陸法解讀[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
7 陳玲;背信犯罪比較研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
8 劉源;論我國犯罪構(gòu)成結(jié)構(gòu)之完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
9 張駿;論美國縱向限制法律規(guī)范及其對我國的啟示[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
10 鄔先江;海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年
，本文編號：2163173
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2163173.html
最近更新
教材專著
