本文選題：朝陽市人民法院 + 審判權(quán)��； 參考：《大連理工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：依法治國是世界各國對歷史的總結(jié),也是現(xiàn)實發(fā)展的需要。要做到司法治國就要做好司法工作,而要做好司法工作,就離不開對司法的監(jiān)督。對司法的監(jiān)督一是需要行之有效的外部監(jiān)督,二是需要司法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督。只有內(nèi)外監(jiān)督很好地結(jié)合,才能充分發(fā)揮監(jiān)督的效果。具體到法院系統(tǒng)而言,司法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督就是人民法院的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督。 目前,朝陽市人民法院和全國大多數(shù)人民法院存在的基本問題是司法質(zhì)量不高和腐敗現(xiàn)象時有發(fā)生,這說明一方面是對法院的外部監(jiān)督不夠到位,另一方面也說明法院的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機制不完善,內(nèi)部監(jiān)督部門設(shè)置不夠合理,監(jiān)督功能沒有得到充分發(fā)揮,導(dǎo)致法院審判質(zhì)量不高和司法腐敗沒有及時得到糾正。因此,本文試圖通過對比蘇聯(lián)模式、大陸法系模式、英美法系模式和我國法院內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的實踐基礎(chǔ),找出其內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的優(yōu)勢和啟迪,以及結(jié)合筆者在朝陽市兩級法院實際工作中面臨的問題,從審判職能監(jiān)督和行政職能監(jiān)督兩方面分析朝陽市法院內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機制的現(xiàn)狀,并對存在的問題進行查找,結(jié)合國外內(nèi)的啟示和實際案例的分析,探討如何進一步改進朝陽市法院的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機制,如何進一步促使內(nèi)部監(jiān)督良好的運行,從而提高司法質(zhì)量和防止腐敗,進一步促進朝陽市人民法院的審判權(quán)在合法公正的軌道下運行,進一步為朝陽市法院的發(fā)展和改革提供理論支持和技術(shù)支持。
[Abstract]:Governing the country according to law is the summary of history and the need of development in the world. The administration of justice must be done well, and judicial supervision is indispensable to the administration of justice. Judicial supervision requires effective external supervision and internal judicial supervision. Only the good combination of internal and external supervision, we can give full play to the effect of supervision. Specifically to the court system, the internal supervision of the judiciary is the internal supervision of the people's court. At present, the basic problems existing in the Chaoyang Municipal people's Court and most of the national people's courts are that the judicial quality is not high and corruption occurs from time to time. This shows that, on the one hand, the external supervision of the court is not in place enough. On the other hand, it also shows that the internal supervision mechanism of the court is not perfect, the establishment of the internal supervision department is not reasonable, and the supervision function has not been given full play, resulting in the court trial quality is not high and the judicial corruption has not been corrected in time. Therefore, this paper tries to find out the advantages and enlightenment of the internal supervision by comparing the Soviet model, the civil law system model, the common law system model and the practical basis of the court internal supervision in our country. Combined with the problems faced by the author in the actual work of the Chaoyang Municipal Court, this paper analyzes the present situation of the internal supervision mechanism of the court in Chaoyang City from the aspects of judicial function supervision and administrative function supervision, and finds out the existing problems. Combining with the enlightenment and practical case analysis of foreign countries, this paper discusses how to further improve the internal supervision mechanism of the court of Chaoyang City and how to further promote the good operation of internal supervision, thereby improving the quality of the judiciary and preventing corruption. It will further promote the judicial power of the Chaoyang Municipal people's Court under the orbit of legality and justice, and provide theoretical and technical support for the development and reform of the court in Chaoyang City.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖俊萍;;德國法院體系探微[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年07期

2 鄧思清;論審判監(jiān)督的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

3 張_",賀少鋒;論人民法院內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機制的完善[J];法律適用;2003年07期

4 梁三利;郭明;;法院管理模式比較——基于對英國、德國、法國的考察[J];長江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

5 薛阿平,姚旭斌;從監(jiān)督走向制約——法院內(nèi)部審判監(jiān)督制度改革初探[J];法學(xué);1999年09期

6 王振亮;;試論我國審判監(jiān)督制度[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2011年01期

7 柳宗華;齊云飛;;我國法院體制改革的思考[J];法制與社會;2007年10期

8 歐陽建濤;;對法院上、下級之間工作協(xié)調(diào)制約的思考[J];法制與社會;2010年29期

9 尹澤海;論法官職務(wù)監(jiān)督與法官獨立[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

10 袁祖望;權(quán)力制衡理論與國家反腐敗機制[J];暨南學(xué)報(人文科學(xué)與社會科學(xué)版);2004年05期

，

本文編號：2108715