本文選題：司法調解 + 法官角色�。� 參考：《蘇州大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國目前處于加速法治化的進程之中，，司法調解這一頗具中國傳統(tǒng)特色的制度在我國的民事訴訟體系中一直占有十分重要的地位。司法調解制度從新中國成立以來經歷了幾度變遷，法官的調解角色也隨之不斷變化。 本文在分析了法官的一般認知要素的基礎上，對國外的法官角色以及我國的法官角色的古今流變進行了深入的闡述，進而對新中國成立來的法官多重角色以及司法調解制度下的法官調解角色做出了分析，并對不同階段的法官調解角色進行了對比和總結。而后針對目前調解優(yōu)先背景下的司法調解制度以及法官角色的變化進行了原因分析，探究這一調解制度對我國司法現狀的積極、消極影響以及調解優(yōu)先背景下所帶來的法官角色沖突。最后針對目前的消極影響和沖突狀況，提出了制度層面上的措施，并認為僅僅從司法角度進行完善是不夠的，更重要的是進行調解理念和機制的重塑。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the process of speeding up the rule of law. Judicial mediation, a system with Chinese traditional characteristics, has always occupied a very important position in the civil litigation system of our country. Judicial mediation system has undergone several changes since the founding of New China. Based on the analysis of the general cognitive elements of the judges, this paper makes a deep exposition of the foreign judges' roles and the ancient and modern changes of the judges' roles in our country. Then it analyzes the multiple roles of judges and the role of judges mediation under the system of judicial mediation, and compares and summarizes the roles of judges in different stages. Then it analyzes the reasons of the judicial mediation system and the change of the judge's role under the background of mediation priority at present, and probes into the positive effect of this mediation system on the judicial status quo of our country. The negative influence and the conflict of judges' role in the background of mediation priority. Finally, aiming at the current situation of negative influence and conflict, the author puts forward the measures on the system level, and thinks that it is not enough to perfect from the angle of judicature, and more importantly, to remould the idea and mechanism of mediation.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 馬建華;;論我國司法調解制度的完善[J];當代法學;2010年05期

2 張艷麗;;法院調解前置模式選擇:民事審前調解[J];法學雜志;2011年10期

3 趙鋼;;法院調解結案率須當慎定[J];法學;2008年03期

4 李浩;民事審判中的調審分離[J];法學研究;1996年04期

5 佟季;;新中國成立60年人民法院訴訟調解情況分析——馬錫五審判方式在我國的當代司法價值[J];人民司法;2010年07期

本文編號：2105354