本文選題：司法空間結(jié)構(gòu) + 廣場(chǎng)��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：司法空間結(jié)構(gòu),就如同“帶著鐐銬舞蹈”中的“鐐銬”在影響著舞者的動(dòng)作一樣,決定著司法權(quán)力運(yùn)作的方式。 在歷史上,已經(jīng)存在了兩種司法空間結(jié)構(gòu),即“廣場(chǎng)”結(jié)構(gòu)和“劇場(chǎng)”結(jié)構(gòu)。它們不是憑空產(chǎn)生的,這就如同舞者的肉身上不會(huì)平白多出一副堅(jiān)固的鐐銬,而是在社會(huì)(廣義理解)中孕育發(fā)展出來的,此乃幾乎戰(zhàn)無不勝的“歷史唯物主義木偶”給出的必然推論。初民社會(huì)中孕育出了“廣場(chǎng)”,它的創(chuàng)造者是普通的大眾,所謂的“大眾審判”就是它的表象；現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中孕育出了“劇場(chǎng)”,它的創(chuàng)造者是特殊的法律職業(yè)共同體,而“法律帝國中的國王”恰好擔(dān)此重任。 中國社會(huì)面臨著轉(zhuǎn)型,與此相伴的,中國的司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)也在發(fā)生的轉(zhuǎn)型。既然是轉(zhuǎn)型,就意味著一種不確定,但也正是這種不確定,才帶來了新的可能,才出現(xiàn)了中國特色。 一方面,中國的社會(huì)(狹義理解)呈現(xiàn)出三種面相,即風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)、消費(fèi)社會(huì)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì),這三種社會(huì)形態(tài)分別呈現(xiàn)出中國社會(huì)的一個(gè)側(cè)面,只有聯(lián)系在一起進(jìn)行考慮,才可以真正認(rèn)識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)型中中國社會(huì)的特點(diǎn)。另一方面,中國的司法權(quán)力體現(xiàn)為一種功能主義的傾向,無論是司法判決還是司法系統(tǒng)都帶有這種傾向。這既是傳統(tǒng)中國司法文化的延伸,也是馬克思主義中國化的部分結(jié)果,同時(shí)還是現(xiàn)今中國司法實(shí)踐的真實(shí)情況。這兩方面結(jié)合起來,恰恰符合轉(zhuǎn)型中國的情況,即中國的轉(zhuǎn)型,不是單純地從前現(xiàn)代社會(huì)向現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的轉(zhuǎn)型,而是伴隨著后現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的共時(shí)性轉(zhuǎn)型。惟有這種復(fù)雜性,才使得一種新的司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)成為可能。 當(dāng)下中國的社會(huì)(狹義理解)狀態(tài)和中國的司法狀態(tài)結(jié)合在一起的時(shí)候,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),此時(shí)司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)所展示出來的現(xiàn)象,無法用“廣場(chǎng)”或“劇場(chǎng)”加以概括,它即呈現(xiàn)出一定的“廣場(chǎng)”特征,又體現(xiàn)出一定的“劇場(chǎng)”特征,但在本質(zhì)上又與二者都存在著不同之處。如果用函數(shù)表示,這一本質(zhì)的不同即在于,“廣場(chǎng)”與“劇場(chǎng)”的變量為“審判者數(shù)量”和“國家權(quán)力”的一次函數(shù),而當(dāng)下中國司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)所展示出的新形態(tài)的函數(shù),如果繼續(xù)采用這兩個(gè)變量,那么就是與它們相關(guān)的二次函數(shù)。為了方便起見,有必要給這個(gè)新函數(shù)也尋求一個(gè)一次函數(shù)的變量,則變量為兩種意識(shí)形態(tài),即“合法／非法”二元代碼語境下的規(guī)則意識(shí)與“自然法/實(shí)證法”二元沖突語境下的規(guī)則意識(shí)。這種新的司法空間結(jié)構(gòu),可以稱之為"Wiki空間結(jié)構(gòu)”。 之所以稱為Wiki空間結(jié)構(gòu),乃是因?yàn)槠錁?gòu)建的方式與Wiki的構(gòu)建規(guī)則頗為相似。Wiki的構(gòu)建規(guī)則則分別是與網(wǎng)絡(luò)密切相關(guān)、擁有特定的條目和相互間的合作性,比較貼切地詮釋了新函數(shù)的內(nèi)涵。而與之相應(yīng),Wiki司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)具有四個(gè)特點(diǎn),即全方位的開放性,興趣點(diǎn)的差異性,司法裁判的最終性,以及主體間的合作性。而2009年以來的諸多案件,都可以作為此類司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)的案例,比較典型的有：“交通肇事行為的定罪”與“全方位的開放性”,“藥家鑫案/李莊漏罪案”與“興趣點(diǎn)的差異性”等。至于司法裁判的最終性和主體間的合作性這兩個(gè)特征,則蘊(yùn)藏在每一個(gè)個(gè)案之中,無需單獨(dú)例證。 作為一種新的司法空間結(jié)構(gòu),尤其是不同于傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)的新形態(tài),或許有很大的可能被斥之為“病態(tài)”,但若用生理學(xué)的研究眼光而不是病理學(xué)的治療眼光來看,其也不失為一種“非·常態(tài)”。畢竟在當(dāng)下的中國,Wiki司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)也還達(dá)不到常態(tài)化的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。但是,如果可以大膽推論的話,影響這一結(jié)構(gòu)的兩個(gè)方面、五個(gè)要素中的絕大部分要素在未來都呈現(xiàn)出一種增長(zhǎng)的趨勢(shì),而未能體現(xiàn)增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)的要素對(duì)整體的影響亦有存疑。起碼從概率上來看,在可預(yù)見的未來,Wiki司法空間結(jié)構(gòu)將逐步從“非·常態(tài)”走向一種“常態(tài)”。
[Abstract]:The judicial spatial structure, like the "shackles" in the dance of chains, affects the movements of the dancers, and determines the way in which judicial power operates.
In history, there have been two kinds of judicial space structures, that is, the "square" structure and the "theater" structure. They are not created out of thin air. This is just as the dancer's body does not produce a strong shackle, but is conceived and developed in the society. This is the almost unconquering "historical materialism wood". The inevitable inferences given by me give birth to the "square" in the initial people's society. Its creator is a common public, and the so-called "mass trial" is its appearance; the modern society breeds the "theater", its creator is a special legal profession community, and the "king of the legal Empire" is just responsible for this task.
China's society is facing the transformation, and with this, China's judicial space structure is also in transition. Since it is the transformation, it means a kind of uncertainty, but it is also the uncertainty, which has brought new possibilities, only the emergence of Chinese characteristics.
On the one hand, China's society (narrow sense) presents three facets, that is, the risk society, the consumer society and the network society. These three social forms present one aspect of the Chinese society. Only if they are linked together, we can truly understand the characteristics of the Chinese society in the transition. On the other hand, the judicial power of China is embodied as the embodiment of the Chinese society. A tendency of functionalism, either in judicial decisions or in the judicial system, is an extension of the traditional Chinese judicial culture, as well as a partial result of the Sinicization of Marx's doctrine, and the true situation of the judicial practice in China today. These two aspects are in line with the situation in transition China, that is, China The transformation is not simply the transition from the former modern society to the modern society, but with the synchronic transformation of the post modern society. Only this complexity makes it possible for a new judicial space structure to be made.
At present, when the state of China's society (narrow sense) is combined with the state of China's judicature, it can be found that the phenomena displayed in the judicial space structure can not be summed up by the "square" or "theatre", which presents a certain "square" feature and a certain "theater" feature, but in essence it is in essence. It is different from the two. If the function is expressed, the difference in essence is that the variable of "square" and "theatre" is a function of "the number of judges" and "state power", and the new form of function displayed in the contemporary Chinese judicial space structure, if they continue to use these two variables, then It is the two function related to them. For the sake of convenience, it is necessary to seek a variable of one function for this new function, then the variable is the two ideology, the rule consciousness in the context of "legal / illegal" two yuan code and the sense of rule in the context of "natural law / empirical law" in the context of the conflict of two yuan. This new judicial space The structure can be called the "Wiki space structure".
The reason why it is called Wiki spatial structure is that it is similar to the construction rules of Wiki and the construction rules of.Wiki are closely related to the network, have specific items and mutual cooperation, and interpret the connotation of the new function more closely. Accordingly, the structure of the Wiki judicial space has four characteristics, namely, the structure of the judicial space. All aspects of openness, differences of interest, the ultimate nature of judicial referees, and cooperation between the subjects, and many cases since 2009 can be used as cases of such judicial space structure, which are typical: "convictions of traffic accidents" and "openness of all sides", "Yao Jiaxin case / Li Zhuang leaking crime" The two characteristics of the final nature of the judiciary and the cooperation between the subjects are contained in every case, without a single example.
As a new judicial space structure, especially the new form different from the traditional view, it may be very likely to be reprimanded as "sick", but it is also a "non normality" with the view of physiological research rather than the treatment of pathology. After all, the structure of the Wiki judicial space is also reached in the present China. However, if you can boldly deduce the two aspects of this structure, the overwhelming majority of the five elements present a trend of growth in the future, while the factors that fail to reflect the growth trend are doubtful about the overall impact of the growth trend. In the probability, the Wiki division is in the foreseeable future, in the foreseeable future. The spatial structure of law will gradually move from "non normal" to a "normal state".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳柏峰;;法治熱點(diǎn)案件討論中的傳媒角色——以“藥家鑫案”為例[J];法商研究;2011年04期

2 陳瑞華;司法權(quán)的性質(zhì)——以刑事司法為范例的分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年05期

3 烏爾里�！へ惪� ,王武龍;從工業(yè)社會(huì)到風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)(上篇)——關(guān)于人類生存、社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)和生態(tài)啟蒙等問題的思考[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2003年03期

4 尹鴻偉;;重慶再訴李莊“漏罪”[J];南風(fēng)窗;2011年09期

5 南玲峰;;從對(duì)“孫偉銘案”報(bào)道看媒體的角色定位——以《華西都市報(bào)》的報(bào)道為例[J];新聞世界;2011年02期

6 陳偉;;“胡斌案”量刑問題的理論質(zhì)疑[J];前沿;2010年09期

7 佟季;;二○○九年全國法院審理各類案件情況[J];人民司法;2010年05期

8 劉仁文;;從“廣場(chǎng)化”到“劇場(chǎng)化”的刑事司法——一個(gè)立足經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

9 張涵;;波德里亞關(guān)于“消費(fèi)社會(huì)”與“符號(hào)社會(huì)”的理論[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

10 鄭中玉,何明升;“網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)”的概念辨析[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2101085